Evolutionary relationships and diversification of Stachyuraceae based on sequences of four chloroplast markers and the nuclear ribosomal ITS region

Taxon

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 931-940

  Zhu, Yu Ping ^a,b,d   Wen, Jun ^a,c   Zhang, Zhi Yun ^a   Chen, Zhi Duan ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

^d NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Crossosomataceae; Divergence times; Hybridization; Phylogeny; Stachyuraceae

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; DIVERGENCE; ENDEMIC SPECIES; EVOLUTION; HYBRIDIZATION; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST;

CROSSOSOMATACEAE; STACHYURACEAE; STACHYURUS; STACHYURUS HIMALAICUS; STACHYURUS PRAECOX; STACHYURUS SIGEYOSII;

EID: 33846527986     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/25065687     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group). 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141: 399-436.
2. Baldwin, B. G. & Sanderson, M. J. 1998. Age and rate of diversification of the Hawaiian silversword alliance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95: 9402-9406.
3. Bentham, G. 1861. Notes on Ternstroemiaceae. J. Linn. Soc. 5: 53-65.
4. Bentham, G. & Hooker, J. D. 1862-1867. Genera Plantarum. L. Reeve & Co., London.
5. Boufford, D. E. & Spongberg, S. A. 1983. Eastern Asian-eastern North American phytogeographical relationships - a history from the time of Linnaeus to the twentieth century. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 70: 423-439.
6. Bremer, B., Andreasen, K. & Olsson, D. 1995. Subfamilial and tribal relationships in the Rubiaceae based on rbcL sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 383-397.
7. Chase, M. W., Morton, C. M. & Kallunki, J. A. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of Rutaceae: a cladistic analysis of the subfamilies using evidence from rbcL and atpB sequence variation. Amer. J. Bot. 86: 1191-1199.
8. Chen, S. K. 1981. A study on the Stachyuraceae from China. Acta. Bot. Yunnan. 3: 125-137.
9. Conti, E. A., Fischbach, A. & Sytsma, K. J. 1993. Tribal relationships in Onagraceae: implications from rbcL sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 672-685.
10. Cronquist, A. 1968. The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
11. Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New, York.
12. Cronquist, A. 1988. The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants, ed. 2. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York.
13. Dahlgren, G. 1989. An updated angiosperm classification. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 100: 197-203.
14. Davis, C. C., Bell, C. C., Mathews, S. & Donoghue, M. J. 2002. Laurasian migration explains Gondwanan disjunctions: evidence from Malpighiaceae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99: 6833-6837.
15. Donoghue, M. J. & Smith, S. A. 2004. Patterns in the assembly of temperate forests around the northern hemisphere. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 359: 1633-1644.
16. Dorofeev, P. I. 1963. Tretichnye Flory Zapadnoy Sibiri (Tertiary floras of Western Siberia). Izdat. Akad. Nauk S. S. S. R. Botanicheskii Institut V. L. Komarov. Leningrad, [In Russian].
17. Farris, J. S., Kluge, A. G. & Eckardt, M. J. 1970. A numerical approach to phylogenetic systematics. Syst. Zool. 19: 172-191.
18. Fitch, W. M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimal change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20: 406-416.
19. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Molec. Evol. 17: 368-376.
20. Felsenstein, J. 1988. Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Ann. Rev. Genet. 22: 521-565.
21. Franchet, A. 1898. Plantarum sinensium ecloge secunda. J. Bot. 12: 253-264.
22. Gilg, E. 1895. Stachyuraceae. Pp. 192-193 in: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (eds.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien III. vol. 6. Engelmann, Leipzig.
23. Graham, A. 1972. Outline of the origin and historical recognition of floristic affinities between Asia and eastern North America. Pp. 1-18 in: Graham, A. (ed.), Floristics and Paleofloristics of Asia and Eastern North America. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
24. Gray, A. 1859. Diagnostic characters of phanerogamous plants collected in Japan by Charles Wright, botanist of the U.S. North Pacific Exploring Expedition, with observations upon the relations of the Japanese flora to that of North America, and other parts of the north temperate zone. Mem. Amer. Acad. Arts Sci. n. s. 6: 377-453.
25. Gregor, H.-J. 1975. Die mittelmiozäne Mastixioideen-Flora aus dem Braunkohlen-Tagebau Oder II bei Wackersdorf (Oberpfalz). PhD thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München.
26. Gundersen, A. 1950. Families of Dicotyledons. Chronica Botanica, Waltham.
27. Hall, T. A. 1999. Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41: 95-98.
28. Hoey, M. T. & Parks, C. R. 1991. Isozyme divergence between eastern Asia, North American and Turkish species of Liquidambar (Hamamelidaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 78: 938-947.
29. Hong, D. Y. 1993. Eastern Asian-North American disjunctions and their biological significance. Cathaya 5: 1-39.
30. Hu, H. H. 1951. Teaching Materials of Spermatophyte Classification. Chinese Publishing House. Shanghai, China.
31. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, R. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
32. Hutchinson, J. 1967. Key to the Families of Flowering Plants of the World. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
33. Jotani, Y. 1977. On Stachyurus sigevosii Masamune. J. Jap. Bot. 52: 376-377.
34. Kimoto, Y. & Tokuoka, T. 1999. Embryology and relationships of Stachyurus (Stachyuraceae). Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 50: 187-200.
35. Kirchheimer, F. 1943. Bemerkenswerte Frucht-und Samenreste, besonders aus den Braunkohlenschichten der Lausitz. Bot. Arch. 44: 362-430.
36. Koontz, J. A. & Soltis, D. E. 1999. DNA sequence data reveal polyphyly of Brexioideae (Brexiaceae, Saxifragaceae sensu lato). Pl. Syst. Evol. 219: 199-208.
37. Kurosawa, S. 1971. Cytological studies on some Eastern Himalayan plants and their related species, Pp. 355-364 in: Hara, H. (ed.), Flora of Eastern Himalaya, second report. Univ. Tokyo Press, Tokyo.
38. Lee, C. & Wen, J. 2002. Phylogeny and biogeography of the Asian clade of Araliaceae: insights from the nuclear ribosomal and chloroplast DNA data. Pp. 132 in: Botanical Society of America (eds.), Abstracts of Botany 2002 Meetings, Madison, Wisconsin. Botanical Society of America, Madison.
39. Li, H. L. 1943. The genus Stachyurus. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 70: 615-628.
40. Li, H. L. 1952. Floristic relationships between eastern Asia and eastern North America. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 42: 371-429.
41. Li, H. L. 1992. On the origin of Stachyurus. Acta. Bot. Yunnan. 5: 81-96.
42. Li, H. L. 1993. Stachyuraceae. Pp. 835 in: Editorial Committee of the Flora of Taiwan (ed.), Flora of Taiwan, ed. 2, vol 3. Editorial Committee of the Flora of Taiwan, Taipei.
43. MacGinitie, H. D. 1969. The Eocene Green River flora of northwestern Colorado and northeastern Utah. Univ. Calif. Publ. Geol. Sci. 83: 1-203.
44. Masamune, G. 1938. Miscellaneous notes on the flora of the eastern Asia V. Trans. Nat. Hist. Soc. Form. 28: 287-288.
45. Mai, D. H. 1964. Die Mastixioideen-Floren im Tertiär der Oberlausitz. Paläont. Abh. Berlin B 2: 1-192.
46. Mai, D. H. 1995. Tertiäre Vegetationsgeschichte Europas. Fischer, Jena.
47. Manchester, S. R. 1999. Biogeographical relationships of North American tertiary floras. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 86: 472-522.
48. Matthews, M. L. & Endress, P. K. 2005. Comparative floral structure and systematics in Crossosomatales (Crossosomataceae, Stachyuraceae, Staphyleaceae, Aphloiaceae, Geissolomataceae, Ixerbaceae, Strasburgeriaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 147: 1-46.
49. Mau, B., Newton, M. & Larget, B. 1999. Bayesian phylogenetic inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Biometrics 55: 1-12.
50. Miki, S. 1941. On the change of flora in eastern Asia since Tertiary Period (I). The clay or lignite beds flora in Japan with special reference to the Pinus trifolia beds in central Hondo. Jap. J. Bot. 11: 237-303.
51. Miki, S. & Kokawa, S. 1962. Late Cenozoic floras of Kyushu, Japan. J. Biol. Osaka City Univ. 13: 65-85.
52. Morgan, D. R. & Soltis, D. E. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships among members of Saxifragaceae sensu lato based on rbcL sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 631-660.
53. Mueller, G. M., Wu, Q. X., Huang, Y. Q., Guo, S. Y., Gomez, R. A. & Vilgalys, R. 2001. Assessing biogeographic relationships between North American and Chinese macrofungi based on molecular data. J. Biogeogr. 28: 271-281.
54. Nandi, O. I., Chase, M. W. & Endress, P. K. 1998. A combined cladistic analysis of angiosperms using rbcL and molecular data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 137-212.
55. Nie, Z.-L, Wen, J., Sun, H. & Bartholomew, B. 2005. Monophyly of Kelloggia Torrey ex Benth. (Rubiaceae) and evolution of its intercontinental disjunction between western North America and eastern Asia. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 642-652.
56. Nie, Z.-L., Sun, H., Li, H. & Wen, J. 2006. Intercontinental biogeography of subfamily Orontioideae (Symplocarpus, Lysichiton, and Orontium) of Araceae in eastern Asia and North America. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 40: 155-165.
57. Ohi, T., Wakabayashi, M., Wu, S.-G. & Murata, J. 2003. Phylogeography of Stachyurus praecox (Stachyuraceae) in the Japanese archipelago based on chloroplast DNA haplotypes. J. Jap. Bot. 78: 1-14.
58. Olmstead, R. G. & Sweere, J. A. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst. Biol. 43: 467-481.
59. Oxelman, B., Lidén, M. & Berglund, D. 1997. Chloroplast rps16 intron phylogeny of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 206: 393-410.
60. Posada, D. & Crandall, K. A. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
61. Price, R. A. & Palmer, J. D. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships of the Geraniaceae and Geraniales from rbcL sequence comparison. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 631-660.
62. Rambaut, A. & Grassly, N. C. 1997. Seq-Gen: An application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13: 235-238.
63. Rannala, B. & Yang, Z. H. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: A new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Molec. Evol. 43: 304-311.
64. Sanderson, M. J. 2002. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Molec. Biol. Evol. 19: 101-109.
65. Sanderson, M. J. 2003. R8s: Analysis of Rates ("r8s") of Evolution (and Other Stuff), version 1.60. http://ginger.uc davis.edu/r8s/.
66. Sanmartin, I. Enghoff, H. & Ronquist, F. 2001. Patterns of animal dispersal, vicariance and diversification in the Holarctic. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 73: 345-390.
67. Savolainen, V., Spichiger, R. & Manen, J. F. 1997. Polyphyletism of Celastrales deduced from a chloroplast noncoding DNA region. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 7: 145-157.
68. Savolainen, V., Chase, M. W., Hoot, S. B., Morton, C. M., Soltis, D. E., Bayer, C., Fay, M. F., Bruijn, A. Y., Sullivan, S. & Qiu, Y.-L. 2000a. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on combined analysis of plasid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst. Biol. 49: 306-362.
69. Savolainen, V., Fay, M. F., Albach, D., Backlund, C., Bank, M. V. D., Cameron, K. M., Johnson, S. A., Lledo, M. D, Pintaud, J. C., Powell, M., Sheahan, M. C., Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Weston, P., Whitten, W. M., Wurdack, K. J. & Chase, M. W. 2000b. Phylogeny of the eudicots: a nearly complete familial analysis based on rbcL gene sequences. Kew Bull. 55: 257-309.
70. Shan, H. R. 1999. Stachyuraceae. Pp. 81-96 in: Delectis Florae Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae Agendae Academiae Sinicae Edita (ed.), Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinica, vol. 52 (1). Science Press, Beijing.
71. Shaw, J. & Small, R. L. 2004. Addressing the "hardest puzzle in American pomology" phylogeny of Prunus sect. Prunocerasus (Rosaceae) based on seven noncoding chloroplast DNA regions. Amer. J. Bot. 91: 985-996.
72. Siebold, P. F. & Zuccarini, J. G. 1835. Flora Japonica. Zuccarini, Leiden.
73. Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Chase, M. W., Mort, M. E., Albach, D. C., Zanis, M., Savolainen, V., Hahn, W. H., Hoot, S. B., Fay, M. F., Axtell, M., Swensen, S. M., Prince, L. M., Kress, W. J., Nixon, K. C. & Farris, J. S. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 381-461.
74. Sosa, V. & Chase, M. W. 2003. Phylogenetics of Crossosomataceae based on rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 28: 96-105.
75. Swofford, D. L. 2003. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods), version 4.0b 10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
76. Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G. & Bouvet, J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Pl. Molec. Biol. 17: 1105-1109.
77. Takhtajan, A. 1969. Flowering Plants, Origin and Dispersal. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, UK.
78. Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
79. Tang, Y. C., Cao, Y. L., Xi, Y. Z. & He, J. 1983. Systematic studies on Chinese Stachyuraceae (1) - phytogeography, cytology, and palynology. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 21: 236-253.
80. Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J., Plewniak, E. F. & Higgins, D. G. 1997. The ClustalX Windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 24: 4876-4882.
81. Thorne, R. F. 1972. Major disjunctions in the geographical ranges of seed plants. Quart. Rev. Biol. 47: 365-411.
82. Thorne, R. F. 2000. The classification and geography of the flowering plants: dicotyledons of the class Angiospermae. Bot. Rev. 66: 442-624.
83. Tiffney, B. H. 1979. Fruits and seeds of the Brandon Lignite III. Turpinia (Staphyleaceae). Brittonia 31: 39-51.
84. Tiffney, B. H. 1985a. The Eocene North Atlantic land bridge: its importance in Tertiary and modern phytogeography of the northern hemisphere. J. Arnold Arbor. 66: 243-273.
85. Tiffney, B. H. 1985b. Perspectives on the origin of floristic similarity between eastern Asia and eastern North America. J. Arnold Arbor. 66: 73-94.
86. Wang, W. P., Hwang, C. Y., Lin, T. P. & Hwang, S. Y. 2003 Historical biogeography and phylogenetic relationships of the genus Chumaecyparis (Cupressaceae) inferred from chloroplast DNA polymorphism. Pl. Syst. Evol. 241: 13-28.
87. Wei, Z. X., Jin, Q. J., Wang, H., Tian, X. & Chen, S. K. 2002. Pollen morphology of Stachyuraceae and related taxa. Acta Bot. Yunnanica 24: 483-496.
88. Wei, Z. X. & Yang, Z. H. 2001. Growth, development and some biological phenomena of Stachyurus himalaicus under different environmental conditions. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 7: 315-320.
89. Wen, J. 1999. Evolution of eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct distributions in flowering plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 421-455.
90. Wheeler, E. F., Scott, R. A. & Barghoorn, E. S. 1978. Fossil dicotyledonous woods from Yellowstone National Park II. J. Arnold. Arbor. 59: 1-26.
91. White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pp. 315-322 in: Innis, M. A., Gelfand, D. H., Shinsky, J. J. & White, T. J. (eds.), PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego.
92. Wikström, N., Savolainen, V. & Chase, M. W. 2001. Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc. Royal Soc. London, ser. B 268: 2211-2220.
93. Wolfe, J. A. 1975. Some aspects of plant geography in the northern hemisphere during the late Cretaceous and Tertiary. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62: 264-279.
94. Wood, C. E. 1972. Morphology and phytogeography: the classical approach to the study of disjunctions. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 59: 107-124.
95. Wu, Z. Y. 1983. On the significance of Pacific intercontinental discontinuity. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 70: 577-590.
96. Wu, Z. Y., Tang, Y. C., Lu, A. M. & Chen, Z. D. 1998. On primary subdivisions of the Magnoliophyta - towards a new scheme for an eight class - system of classification of the angiosperms. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 36: 385-402.
97. Wu, Z. Y., Lu, A. M., Tang, Y. C., Chen, Z. D & Li, D. Z. 2002. Synopsis of a new "polyphyletic-polychronic-polytopic" system of the angiosperms. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 40: 289-322.
98. Xiang, Q. Y., Soltis, D. E. & Soltis, P. S. 1998. The eastern Asian and eastern and western North America floristic disjunction: congruent phylogenetic patterns in seven diverse genera. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 10: 178-190.