The individuals with disabilities education act and california's proposition 227: Implications for english language learners with special needs

Bilingual Research Journal

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 231-251

  Mueller, Tracy Gershwin ^a   Singer, George H S ^a   Grace, Elizabeth J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846479504     PISSN: 15235882     EISSN: 15235890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15235882.2004.10162815     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baca, L. M. (1990). Theory and practice in bilingual/cross cultural special education: Major issues and implications for research, practice, and policy. Proceedings of the First Research Symposium on Limited English Proficient Student Issues, Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs, 1-12.
2. Bilingual Education Act of1968, 81 Stat. 816 (1969).
3. California Department of Education. (2001). Number of English learners in California public schools by language and grade. Ranked by total, 2000-01 statewide. Retrieved from June 10, 2004, http://data1.cde.gov/dataquest/LEPbylang1asp?cChoice=LepbyLang1&cYear=2000-01& cLevel=State&cTopic=LC&myTimeFrame=S&submit1=submit
4. California department of Education, Special Education Division. (2001).
5. Special education enrollment by ethnicity and disability, statewide report. Retrieved June 10, 2004, from http://data1cde.ca.gov/dataquest/SpecEd/SEEnrEthDis1.asp?cChoice=SEEthDis1&cLevel=State&cYear= 2000-01&ReptCycle=December
6. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complimentary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Cummins, J. (1983). Bilingualism and special education: Program and pedagogical issues. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 6, 373-386.
8. Cummins, J. (1991). Interdependence of first- and second-language proficiency inbilingual children. In E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 70-89). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cummins, J. (1992). Bilingual education and English immersion: The Ramirez report in theoretical perspective. Bilingual Research Journal, 16(1-2), 91-104.
10. Diaz-Rico, L., & Weed, K. (1995). The cross-cultural language and academic development handbook: A complete K-12 reference guide. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11. Donovan, S., & Cross, C. T. (Eds.). (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
12. Downing, J. E. (1999). Teaching communication skills to students with severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
13. Education for All Handicapped Children Act Amendments of 1990, 104 Stat. 1103 (1990).
14. “English for the Children,” California state Proposition 227 (1998). Title 5, California Code of Regulation, Division 1, Chapter 11.
15. Gándara, P. (2000). In the aftermath of the storm: English learners in the post-227 era. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1-2), 1-13.
16. Gutiérrez, K. D., Asato, J., Pacheco, M., Moll, L. C., Olson, K., Horng, E. L., Ruiz, R., et al. (2002). “Sounding American”: The consequences of new reforms on English language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(3), 328-343.
17. Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-López, P., & Asato, J. (2000). “English for the children”: The new literacy of the old world order, language policy and educational reform. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1-2), 87-112.
18. Hallahan, D. P., & Kauffman, J. M. (2000). Exceptional learners: Introduction to special education (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
19. José P. v. Ambach, 3 EHLR 551: 245 (E.D.N.Y. 1979).
20. Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver, 576 F. Supp. 1503 [15 Ed. Law Rep. 796] (Cob.1983).
21. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
22. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Maxwell-Jolly, J. (2000). Factors influencing implementation of mandated policy change: Proposition227 in seven northern California school districts. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1-2), 37-56.
24. Mora, J. K. (2000). Staying the course in times of change: Preparing teachers for minority education. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(5), 345-357.
25. Palmer, D. K., & García, E. E. (2000). Voices from the field: Bilingual educators speak candidly about Proposition 227. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1-2), 169-178.
26. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Rowley V Hendrick-Hudson School District, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
28. Schirling, E., Contreras, F., & Ayala, C. (2000). Proposition 227: Tales from the schoolhouse. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1-2), 127-140.
29. Stritikus, T., & García, E. E. (2000). Education of limited English proficient students in California schools: An assessment of the influence of Proposition 227 on selected teachers and classrooms. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1 & 2), 75-85
30. Turnbull, A., & Turnbull, R. (2001). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: Collaborating for empowerment. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31. U.S. Bureau ofthe Census. (2000). American community survey change profile, 2000-2002, California. Retrieved June 10, 2004, from http://census.gov/acs/www/Products/Profile/Chg/2002/0002/Tabular/040/0400Us061.htm
32. Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 794 (a) § 504 (1973).
33. Weatherley, R., & Lipsky, M. (1977). Street-level bureaucrats and institutional innovation: Implementing special-education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 47(2), 171-197.
34. Yell, M. L. (1998). The law and special education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.