Evolutionary coupling between the deleteriousness of gene mutations and the amount of non-coding sequences

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 244, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 621-630

  Knibbe, Carole ^a,b   Mazet, Olivier ^c   Chaudier, Fabien ^a   Fayard, Jean Michel ^b   Beslon, Guillaume ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b UA INRA 203   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Genome evolution; Mutation effect; Non coding DNA; Robustness; Variability

Indexed keywords

SPACER DNA;

GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENOME; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHROMOSOME INVERSION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE MUTATION; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENE REPLICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE TRANSLOCATION; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STRUCTURAL GENOMICS; UNTRANSLATED REGION;

ANIMALS; DNA, INTERGENIC; EVOLUTION; GENE DELETION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENOME; GENOME COMPONENTS; GENOTYPE; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; TRANSLOCATION, GENETIC; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 33846454332     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Achaz G., Netter P., and Coissac E. Study of intrachromosomal duplications among the eukaryote genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18 (2001) 2280-2288
2. Achaz G., Rocha E.P., Netter P., and Coissac E. Origin and fate of repeats in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 30 (2002) 2987-2994
3. Ancel L.W., and Fontana W. Plasticity, evolvability, and modularity in rna. J. Exp. Zool. 288 (2000) 242-283
4. Ancel Meyers L., Ancel F.D., and Lachmann M. Evolution of genetic potential. PLoS Comput. Biol. 1 (2005) e32
5. Barabasi A.-L., and Oltvai Z.N. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5 (2004) 101-113
6. Bataillon T. Estimation of spontaneous genome-wide mutation rate parameters: whither beneficial mutations?. Heredity 84 (2000) 497-501
7. Dubois D., and Prade H. Fuzzy Sets and Systems Theory and Applications (1980), Academic Press, New York
8. Fontana W., and Schuster P. Continuity in evolution: on the nature of transitions. Science 280 (1998) 1451-1455
9. Goldberg D.E., Deb K., Kargupta H., and Harik G. Rapid accurate optimization of difficult problems using fast messy genetic algorithms. In: Forrest S. (Ed). Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (1993), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA 56-64
10. Hughes D. Impact of homologous recombination on genome organization and stability. In: Charlebois R.L. (Ed). Organization of the Prokaryotic Genome (1999), ASM Press, Washington, DC 109-128
11. Jeong H., Mason S., Barabasi A., and Oltvai Z. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411 (2001) 41-42
12. Kibota T.T., and Lynch M. Estimate of the genomic mutation rate deleterious to overall fitness in E. coli. Nature 381 (1996) 694-696
13. Kimura M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution (1983), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
14. Knibbe C., Beslon G., Lefort V., Chaudier F., and Fayard J.-M. Self-adaptation of genome size in artificial organisms. In: Capcarrere M.S., Freitas A.A., Bentley P.J., Johnson C.G., and Timmis J. (Eds). Advances in Artificial Life, Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference, ECAL 2005. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence vol. 3630 (2005), Springer, Berlin 423-432
15. Layzer D. Genetic variation and progressive evolution. Am. Nat. 115 (1980) 809-826
16. Martin G., and Lenormand T. A general multivariate extension of Fisher's geometrical model and the distribution of mutation fitness effects across species. Evolution 60 (2006) 893-907
17. Morange M. Gene function. Life Sci. 323 12 (2000) 1147-1153
18. Morgan T.H. The Theory of the Gene (1926), Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
19. Rocha E.P.C. An appraisal of the potential for illegitimate recombination in bacterial genomes and its consequences: from duplications to genome reduction. Genome Res. 13 (2003) 1123-1132
20. Schuster P., and Swetina J. Stationary mutant distributions and evolutionary optimization. Bull. Math. Biol. 50 (1988) 635-660
21. Van Nimwegen E., Crutchfield J.P., and Huynen M. Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 9716-9720
22. Wagner G., and Altenberg L. Complex adaptations and evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50 (1996) 967-976
23. Wagner G.P., Booth G., and Bagheri-Chaichian H. A population genetic theory of canalization. Evolution 51 (1997) 329-347
24. Whitley D. The GENITOR algorithm and selection pressure: why rank-based allocation of reproductive trials is best. In: Schaffer J.D. (Ed). Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (1989), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Mateo CA 116-121
25. Wilke C.O. Adaptive evolution on neutral networks. Bull. Math. Biol. 63 (2001) 715-730
26. Wilke C.O., Wang J.L., Ofria C., Lenski R.E., and Adami C. Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to the survival of the flattest. Nature 412 (2001) 331-333
27. Wright S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations vol. 1 (1968), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
28. Wuchty S. Evolution and topology in the yeast protein interaction network. Genome Res. 14 7 (2004) 1310-1314