Self-adaptation of genome size in artificial organisms

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3630 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 423-432

  Knibbe, C ^a   Beslon, G ^a   Lefort, V ^a   Chaudier, F ^a   Fayard, J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIODIVERSITY; COMPUTATION THEORY; DESIGN FOR TESTABILITY; GENES; MUTAGENS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SELF ASSEMBLY;

ARTIFICIAL ORGANISMS; CONSTANT GENOME-WIDE MUTATION RATE; FITNESS COMPUTATION; MUTATIONAL PRESSURE;

BIOMECHANICS;

EID: 33645996967     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11553090_43     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Maynard-Smith, J.: Overview - unsolved evolutionary problems. In Dover, G.A., Flavell, R.B., eds.: Genome evolution, New York, NY, Academic Press (1982) 375-382
2. Lenski, R.E.: Phenotypic and genomic evolution during a 20,000-generation experiment with the bacterium Escherichia coli. Plant Breeding Reviews 24 (2004) 225-265
3. Goldberg, D.E., Deb, K., Kargupta, H., Harik, G.: Rapid accurate optimization of difficult problems using fast messy genetic algorithms. In Forrest, S., ed.: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, San Mateo, CA, Morgan Kaufmann (1993) 56-64
4. Burke, D.S., De Jong, K.A., Grefenstette, J.J., Ramsey, C.L., Wu, A.S.: Putting more genetics into genetic algorithms. Evolutionary Computation 6 (1998) 387-410
5. Ochoa, G., Harvey, I., Buxton, H.: Optimal mutation rates ans selection pressure in genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2000), San Francisco, CA, Morgan Kaufmann (2000)
6. Eigen, M., Schuster, P.: The hypercycle: A principle of natural self-organization. Springer-Verlag (1979)
7. Petrov, D.A.: Mutational equilibrium model of genome size evolution. Theoretical Population Biology 61 (2002) 533-546
8. Mira, A., Ochman, H., Moran, N.A.: Deletional bias and the evolution of bacterial genomes. Trends in Genetics 17 (2001) 589-596
9. Gregory, T.R.: Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cell size, and the C-value enigma. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 76 (2001) 65-101
10. Doolittle, W.F., Sapienza, C.: Selfish genes,the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature 284 (1980) 601-603
11. Ohno, S.: So much junk DNA in our genome. In Smith, H.H., ed.: Evolution of Genetic Systems, New York, Gordon and Breach (1972) 336-370
12. Eigen, M., McCaskill, J., Schuster, P.: The molecular quasi-species. Adv. Chem. Phys. 75 (1989) 149-263
13. Van Nimwegen, E., Crutchfield, J.P., Huynen, M.: Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 9716-9720
14. Ofria, G., Wilke, G.: Avida: A software platform for research in computational evolutionary biology. Artificial Life 10 (2004) 191-229
15. Wilke, C.O., Wang, J.L., Ofria, C., Lenski, R.E., Adami, C.: Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to the survival of the flattest. Nature 412 (2001) 331-333