Evolution of genetic potential

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 0236-0243

  Meyers, Laureri Arscel ^a   Arsesl, Freckle D ^b   Laehmarm, Svhchael ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b SANTA FE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHYSIOLOGY;

CONSTANT CONDITIONS; DYNAMICAL ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC POTENTIAL; HOMOEOSTASIS; MATHEMATICA; SELECTIVE SWEEP; STEADY-STATE CONDITION; STOCHASTICS; TRACK CHANGES;

STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

EID: 33746921335     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010032     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Huynen MA. Sudler PF. Foniana W (1996) Smoothness within .uggedness: The role of neutrality in adaptation. Froc Natl Atari Sei !J S A 93: 397-401.
2. van Nimwegen E, Crutchfieid JP, Huynen WA (1999) Neutral evolution of mutationai robustness. Proc Natl Acad Sei U S A 96: 9716 -9720.
3. De Visier JAGM, Hermisson J, Wague, GF, Meyeis LA, et al. (2003) Perspective: Evolution ar.cl detection of genetic robustness. Evolution 57: 1959-1972.
4. Krakauer DC. Piolkin JB (2002) Redundancy, antiredundancy, and the tobuslneis of genorp.es. Ptoc Natl Acad Sei U S A 99: 1405-1409.
5. Ancel l.W. Fontana W (2000) Plasticity, evoivability, and modularity in RNA. j Exp Zool 288: 212-283.
6. G Schîichting C, Mutren C (2004) Evolvabiiity and the raw materials for adaptation. In: Taylor i, editor. Plant adaptation: Molecular biology and ecology. Vancouver: NRC Canada Research Press, pp. 18-29
7. Meyers LA, Biilljj ;2002> Fighting change with change: Adaptive variation ir, an uncertain world. Trends Ecol Evol 17- 551-557.
8. Schiichting CD, Piglkicci M (1998) Phenol)pic evolution_A reaction norm perspective. Sundes land (Massachusetts): Simmer Associates. 387 p.
9. Ancei LW (1999) A quantitative model of the Simpson-Balriwin effect. Iheor Biol 196: 197-209.
10. Kawecki Tj (2ÜOÜ) The evolution of aenetic canaliJ.alion under fluctuating selection Evolution 54: 1-12.
11. I 1. Bull 1J (1987) Evolution of phenotypic variance. Evolution 41- 303-315.
12. Mo.von ER, Raine-) PB, Kowak MA, Lc-nski RE (1994) Adaptive evolution of hiahiy mutable loci in palhoaenic bacteria. Curr Biol 4: 24-33.
13. Miller JH (1998) Miit;m>rs in Exhe,if:hia ml,. Mutât Res 409- 99-IOS.
14. Baldwin JM (1896) A new factor in evolution. Am Nat 30: 441-451.
15. Fonlana W. Schuifei P (1998) Continuity in evolution: On the nature of transitions Science 280: 1451-1455.
16. Ü. Plotkin J, Düähoff, Deasai M, Eraser 1-1 (2004) Synonymous codon usage and selection on proteins. Arxiv.org E.-Prinl Aschives. Available, hftp: arxiv.on;,'PS...vacheq-bio,'pdf0410u4100-!3.pdf. Accessed 3 August 2005.
17. 7. Yang W, Bielawski JF. Yang 7 (2003) Widespread adaptive evolution in the human immunodeficiency virus tvpe 1 genome, j Moi Evoi 57: 212-221.
18. Bush R. Bcr.dci C, Subbarao Iv Cox N, Fitch W (1999) Predicting the evoiution ot human influenza A. Science 286: 1921-1925.
19. Grill WD. Wichman HA, Bull | (2ÜOO) Evoiulionaty reversals during irai adaptation to alternating hosts. Genetics 154: 27-37.
20. Matsumura I. Ellington AD (2001) In vitro evolution of beta-glucuionidase lull".' a. L'J tä-u"£iläcto-4i
21. Kyte , Dooliltle RF (19B2) A siinpie method for displaying, the hydropathic character ot a protein, j Moi Biol 157- 105-132.
22. Eigen M. McCaskiii JS. Schuster P (1989) The molecuiai qnasispecies. Adv Chern Fhvs 75: 149-263.
23. Wagner GF, Booth G. Bagheri-Chaichian H (1997) A population genetic theorv of canal,zation. Evolution 51: 329-347.
24. Wagnes A. Stadle. FF (1999) Viral RNA and evolved mutational robustness, j Exp Z,;.,;.l 285: 119- 127
25. Dempster E (1955) Maintenance of genetic helerogenc-itv. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Bioi 20: 25-32.
26. Lachmann M, Jabionka E U996) The inheritance of pbenotypes- Ar, adaptation to fluctuating environments. I Theor Bio 18;: 1-9.
27. Leigh EG (1973; The evolution of mutation raves. Genelies 73: t-l8.
28. Mevers LA, Levin BR, Richardson AR, Stojiljkovic I (2003) Epidemiology, hyper mutation, witnlli-host
29. Drake JW, Cbarleswortb B. Charleswortl-, [), Crow Jf (1998; Rales of
30. Lederberg, linoT (1956) Phase variation insaimonelia. Geneicsi: 743- 757.
31. Nicisen R Vang Z (199S) Likelihood models for detecting positively elected amino acid sites and applications to the H1V-I envelope gene. Genetics 1-18. 929-936.
32. Yang 7., Wong WSW, Welser, R (2005; [Saves empirical Baves inference of amino acid sites under positive selection. Mol Bio Evol 22: 1107- lue.
33. Wasner OP. Altenberg 1. (1996) Perspective. Complex adaptations and he evolution of evolvahllliy. Evolution 50: 967-976.
34. Fisher RA (1922) On the dominance ratio. Proc R Soc Edinb 42. 321-34.
35. Wright S (1934) Physiological and evolutionary theories of dominance. Am Nat 68: 24-53.
36. Smegowski PD, Gertish PJ, Johnson T. Shaver A (2000; The evolution of mutation rates: Separating causes from consequences. Bioessays 22: 10571066.
37. Feldman MW, l)tto SP. Christiansen FB (1997) Population genetic perspectives on the evolution of lecombinations. Annu Rev Gene! 30: 261 -295.
38. Schlosser G. Wagner GP, editors (2004) Modularity in development and evolution Chicago- iJniver-lity of Chicago Press. 600 p.
39. Rutherfoid SL. Lindquist S (I998) Hsp90 as a capacitor lor morphological evolution. Nature 396: 336-342
40. Yang Z. Bieiawski i (2000) Statistical methods tor detecting molecular adaptation. Trends licol Evol 15: 496-503.
41. Endo T. Ikeo K. Gojobori T (1996) I.aige-scale search for genes on which positive selection may operate Moi Bioi Fvol 13: 685-690.
42. 'i'otgerscn DO, Kulathinai Rj. Singh RS (2002) Mammalian sperm proteins are lapidlv evolving: Evidence of positive selection in functionally diverse genes Mol Biol Fvol 19: 1973-1980.
43. Piotkin JB, Dushoff [. Fraset Hβ (2004) Detecting selection using a single genome sequence of M. iubrmdmu and P.follipimin:. Nature 428: 942-945
44. ISagar. T. Graur D (2005) The comparative method rules! Corion volatility Moi Biol Evol 22: 496-500.
45. Mahn MW, Mezey JG. Begun D, Glliespie j(, Kern AD, et al. (2005l livolntionliry u'.jrir.M-n it s: C Oùon uia.- LIDQ -cict ticis on -4ingls? gclioni"-4. Nature sv33: E5-EO.
46. Nieisen R, Hubisz M (2005) Evolutionary genomics- Detecting selection needs comparative data. Nature 433: E6.
47. Sharp PM (2005) Gene "volatility" is most unlikely to reveal adaptation. Moi Biol Evol 22: 807-809.
48. Zhang j (2005) On the evolution of codon volatility. Genetics ;G9: 495-501.
49. Martin G (2001) Counting. The art of enumerative combinasoric:,. New York: Spr inaer-Verlag.
50. Batagey V, Mnar A (i99ai I'AJEK- Program for iarge network analysis. Connections 21. 47-57.