Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite

Dental Materials

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 279-287

  de Andrade, Oswaldo S ^a   de Goes, Mario F ^a   Montes, Marcos A J R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Adhesive resin; Bond strength; Composite resin; Marginal adaptation; Resin cement

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVES; FAILURE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL METHODS; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ADHESIVE RESIN; COMPOSITE RESIN; MARGINAL ADAPTATION; RESIN CEMENT;

DENTAL MATERIALS;

ADHESIVE AGENT; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; PROTECT LINER F; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SINGLE BOND; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DRUG EFFECT; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PERMEABILITY; VISCOSITY;

ADHESIVES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN; DENTIN PERMEABILITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TENSILE STRENGTH; VISCOSITY;

EID: 33846373387     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.028     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Van Noort R. Introduction to dental materials, Section II (1994), Mosby, London p. 89-105
2. Davidson C.L., and De Gee A.J. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 63 (1984) 146-148
3. Robinson P.B., Moore B.K., and Swartz M.L. Comparison of microleakage in direct and indirect composite resin restorations in vitro. Oper Dent 12 (1987) 113-116
4. Ciucchi B., Bouillaguet S., and Holz J. Proximal adaptation and marginal seal of posterior composite resin restorations placed with direct and indirect technique. Quintessence Int 21 (1990) 663-669
5. Montes M.A.J.R., de Goes M.F., Ambrosano G.M.B., Duarte R.M., and Sobrinho L.C. The effect of collagen removal and the use of low-viscosity resin liner on marginal adaptation of resin composite restorations with margins in dentin. Oper Dent 28 (2003) 378-387
6. Feilzer A.J., De Gee A.J., and Davidson C.L. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66 (1987) 1636-1639
7. Llena Puy M.A.C., Navarro L.F., Llacer V.J.F., and Ferrandez A. Composite resin inlays: a study of marginal adaptation. Quintessence Int 24 (1993) 429-433
8. Leinfelder K.F. New developments in resin restorative systems. J Am Dent Assoc 128 (1997) 573-581
9. Peutzfeldt A., and Asmussen E. A comparison of accuracy in seating and gap formation of three inlay/onlay techniques. Oper Dent 15 (1990) 129-135
10. Touati B., and Aidan N. Second generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations. J Esthet Dent 9 (1997) 108-118
11. Fuhrer N. Restoring posterior teeth with a novel indirect composite resin system. J Esthet Dent 9 (1997) 124-130
12. Douglas W.H., Fields R.P., and Fundingsland J.A. A comparison between the microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorative systems. J Dent 30 (2002) 259-269
13. Cassin A.M., and Pearson G.J. Microleakage studies comparing one-visit indirect composite inlay system and direct composite restorative technique. J Oral Rehabil 19 (1994) 265-270
14. Hasegawa E.A., Boyer D.B., and Chan D.C.N. Microleakage of indirect composite inlays. Dent Mater 5 (1989) 388-391
15. Burrow M.F., Tagami J., Negishi T., Nikaido T., and Hosoda H. Early bond strengths of several enamel and dentin bonding systems. J Dent Res 73 (1994) 522-528
16. Hasanreisoglu U., Sonmez H., Uçtasli S., and Wilson H.J. Microleakage of direct and indirect inlay/onlay systems. J Oral Rehabil 23 (1996) 66-71
17. Van DiiJken J.W.V., and Horstedt P. Marginal breakdown of 5-year-old direct composite inlays. J Dent 24 (1996) 389-394
18. Sorensen J.A., and Munksgaard E.C. Ceramic inlay movement during polymerization of resin luting cements. Eur J Oral Sci 103 (1995) 186-189
19. Mak Y.F., Lai S.C.N., Cheung G.S.P., Chan A.W.K., Tay F.R., and Pashley D.H. Micro-tensile bond testing of resin cements and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater 18 (2002) 609-621
20. Bertschinger C., Paul S.J., Lüthy H., and Schärer P. Dual application of dentin bonding agent: effect of bond strength. Am J Dent 9 (1996) 115-119
21. Paul S.J., and Schärer P. The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 17 (1997) 537-545
22. Paul S.J., and Schärer P. Effect of provisional cements on the bond strength of various adhesive bonding systems on dentine. J Oral Rehabil 24 (1997) 8-14
23. Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 17 (2005) 144-155
24. Reis A., Carrilho M.R., Schroeder M., Tancredo L.L., and Loguercio A.D. The influence of storage times and cutting speed on microtensile bond strength. J Adhes Dent 6 (2004) 7-11
25. Dietschi D., Monasevic M., Krejci I., and Davidson C. Marginal and internal adaptation of Class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement. J Dent 30 (2002) 259-269
26. Cadigiaco M.C., Ferrari M., Garberoglio R., and Davidson C. Dentin contamination protection after mechanical preparation for veneering. Am J Dent 9 (1996) 57-60
27. Otsuki M., Yamada T., Inokoshi S., Takatsu T., and Hosoda H. Establishment of a composite resin inlay technique. Part 7. Use of a low viscous resin. Jpn J Conserv Dent 36 (1993) 1324-1330
28. Suzuki S. Clinical evaluation of a new composite crown system to eliminate postoperative sensitivity. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 20 (2000) 499-509
29. Kitasako Y., Burrow M.F., Nikaido T., and Tagami J. Effect of resin coating technique on dentin tensile bond strengths over 3 years. J Esthet Restor Dent 14 (2002) 115-122
30. Swift E.J., Triolo Jr. P.T., Barkmeier W.W., Bird J.L., and Bounds S.J. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. Am J Dent 9 (1996) 100-104
31. Yoshikawa T., Burrow M.F., and Tagami J. A light curing method for improving marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 17 (2001) 359-366
32. Magne P., and Douglas W.H. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont 12 (1999) 111-121
33. Rueggeberg F.A., and Margesson D.H. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 69 (1990) 1652-1658
34. Unterbrink G.L., and Liebenberg W.H. Flowable resin composites as "filled adhesives": literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int 30 (1999) 249-257
35. Marshall G.W., Marshall S.J., Kinney J.H., and Balooch M. The dentin substrate: structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent 25 (1997) 441-458
36. Montes M.A.J.R., de Goes M.F., Cunha M.R.B., and Soares A.B. A morphological and tensile bond strength evaluation of an unfilled adhesive with low-viscosity composites and a filled adhesive in one and two coats. J Dent 29 (2001) 435-441
37. Zheng L., Pereira P.N.R., Nakajima M., Sano H., and Tagami J. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 26 (2001) 97-104
38. Ogata M., Okuda M., Nakajima M., Pereira P.N.R., Sano H., and Tagami J. Influence of the tubules direction on bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent 26 (2001) 27-35