Restoring posterior teeth with a novel indirect composite resin system

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 124-130

  Fuhrer, Nitzan ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ADULT; CASE REPORT; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; REVIEW;

ADULT; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL RESTORATION, TEMPORARY; HUMANS; INLAYS; MANDIBLE; MOLAR;

EID: 0031299887     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: 17088240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1997.tb00930.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bichacbo N. The centripetal build-up for composite resin posterior restorations. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1994; 6:97–24.
2. Magne P. Holz J. Stratification of composite restorations: systmmatic and durable replication of natural aesthetics. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1996; 8:61–70.
3. Touati B. Aidan N. Les compasites de labortoire de seconde generation. Inf Dent 1996; 3:175–183.
4. Roulet JF. Degradation of dental polymers. Basel : Karger, 1986:3–59.
5. Dovidson CL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984; 63:1396–1399.
6. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restorotion. J Dent Res 1987; 66:1636–1639.
7. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded rasin loyers. J Dent Res 1989; 68:48–50.
8. Lutz F, Phillips RW. A classification and evalution of composite rasin systems. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50:980–488.
9. Leinfelder KF. Composite resins. Dent Clin North Am 1985; 29:359–371.
10. Li Y, Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Moore BK, Roberts TA. Effect of filler content and size on properties of composites. J Dent Res 1985; 64:1396–1401.
11. Chung KH, Greener EH. Correlation between degree of conversion, filler con centration, and mechanical properties of posterior composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 1990: 17:487–494.
12. Erickson RL, Glasspoole ES. Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glassionomer and composite resin systems. J Esthet Dent 1994; 6:227–244.
13. Bowen RL. Dental filling material comprising vinyl silane-treated fused silica and a binder consisting of the reaction product of Bis phenol and glycidyl acrylate. United States Patent No. 3,066.112. 1962.
14. Soderholm KJ, Zigan M, Ragan M, Fischlschweiger W, Bergman M. Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63:1248–1254.
15. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adbesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955: 34:849–853.
16. Kanca J. Dental adhesive and the all-bond system. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3:129–132.
17. Manabe A, Ltoh K, Wakumoto S. The optimum combination of dentin bonding system. Dent Mater 1991; 7:148–150.
18. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as a dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3:133–138.
19. Christensen GJ. Bonding resin to dentin: fact or fantasy J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 122:71.
20. Swift EJ, Perdigao J. Heymann HO Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int 1995; 36:95–107.
21. Heymann HO, Bayne SC. Current concepts in dentin bonding: focusing on dentinal adhesion factors. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124:27–36.
22. Leinfelder KF. Current developments in dentin bonding systems: major progress found in today’s products. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124:40–42.
23. Lutz FU, Krep I, Oddera M. Advanced adhesive restorations: the post-amalgam age. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1996; 8:385–394.
24. Fabl N. Predictable aesthetic reconstruction of fractured anterior teeth with composite resins: a case report. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1996; 8:17–31.
25. Krejci I, Guntert A, Lutz F. Scanning electron microscopic and clinical examination of composite resin inlays/onlays up to 12 months in situ. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:403–409.
26. Llena Puy Ma C, Forner NavarroL, Faus Llacer VJ, Ferrandez A. Composite resin inlays: a study of marginal adaptation. Quintessence Int 1993; 24:429–433.
27. Shortall AC, Baylis RL, Baylis MA, Grundy JR. Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restoratioes, and direct composite resin inlays. Int J’ Prosthodont 1989; 2:217–223.
28. Leinfelder KF, Broome JC. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a new universal composite resin. J Esthet Dent 1994; 6:177–183.
29. Dietschi D, De Siebenthal G, Neven-Rosenstand L, Holz J. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence Int 1995; 26:717–727.