Networking goes international: An update

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 211-229

  Slaughter, Anne Marie ^a   Zaring, David ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

International law; International relations; Regimes; Transgovernmentalism

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846345422     PISSN: 15503585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.120026     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Abi-Saab G. 1978. The United Nations Operation in the Congo, 1960-64. Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
2. Ahdieh RB. 2004. Between dialogue and decree: international review of national courts. NY Univ. Law Rev. 76:2029-2163
3. Aman AC. 2004. The Democracy Deficit: Taming Globalization Through Law Reform. New York: NY Univ. Press. 253 pp.
4. Andreas P, Nadelmann E. 2006. Policing the Globe: Criminalization and Crime Control in International Relations. Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press. In press
5. Bermann G. 1996. Regulatory cooperation between the European commission and U.S. administrative agencies. Admin. Law J. Am. Univ. 9:968
6. Bermann G, Herdegen M, Lindseth P. 2001. Transatlantic Regulatory Co-Operation: Legal Problems and Political Prospects. Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press. 656 pp.
7. Berman PS. 2004. Judges as cosmopolitan transnational actors. Tulsa J. Comp. Int. Law 12:109-21
8. Berman PS. 2005. From international law to law and globalization. Columbia J. Transnatl. Law 43:485-556
9. Bignami F. 2005. Transgovernmental networks vs. democracy: the case of the European Information Privacy Network. Mich. J. Int. Law 26:809
10. Bowie RR, 1974. Suez 1956. London/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
11. Braithwaite J, Drahos P. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
12. Buthe T, Mattli W. 2005. Global private governance: lessons from a national model of setting standards in accounting. Law Contemp. Probl. 68:225
13. Cary W. 1974. Federalism and corporate law: reflections upon Delaware. Yale Law. J. 83:663
14. Cappellin R, Batey P, Cappellin TR, eds. 1993. Regional Networks, Border Regions and European Integration. London: Pion. 256 pp.
15. Chayes A. 1974. The Cuban Missile Crisis. London/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
16. Chayes A, Ehrlich T, Lowenfeld A. 1968. The International Legal Process. New York: Little, Brown
17. Cohen J, Sabel C. 2003. Sovereignty and solidarity in the EU. In Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments, ed. J Zeitlin, D Trubek, 13:691-750. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
18. Cohen J, Sabel C. 2006. Norms and global institutions. Prepared for Princeton Global Governance Workshop, Princeton Univ., April 16-18
19. Dorf MC, Sabel CF. 1998. A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Rev. 98:267-371
20. Dorf MC, Sabel CF. 2000. Drug treatment courts and emergent experimentalist government. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 53:831-83
21. Drahos P. 2004. Intellectual property and pharmaceutical markets: a nodal governance approach. Temple Law Rev. 77:401
22. Dubinsky PR. 2005. Human rights law meets private law harmonization: the coming conflict. Yale J. Int. Law 30:211-17
23. Ehrlich T. 1974. Cyprus, 1958-1967. London/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
24. Esty DC. 2006. Good governance at the supranational scale: globalizing administrative law. Yale Law Rev. 115:1490-562
25. Esty DC, Geradin D. 2000. Regulatory cooptition. J. Int. Econ. Law 3:235
26. Esty DC, Geradin D, eds. 2001. Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration. Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
27. Fisher R. 1978. Points of Choice. Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
28. Fox EM. 2000. Antitrust and regulatory federalism: races up, down, and sideways. NY Univ. Law Rev. 75:1785-87, 1802-7
29. Garland M. 1985. Deregulation and judicial review. Harvard Law Rev. 98:505
30. Gerber D. 2004. Prescriptive authority: global markets as a challenge to national regulatory systems. Houston J. Int. Law 26:302, 308
31. Grant R, Keohane R. 2005. Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 99:29-44
32. Haas PM. 1992. Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int. Organ. 46:1-35
33. Huntington SP. 1973. Transnational organizations in world politics. World Polit. 25:333-68
34. Ignatieff M, ed. 2005. American Exceptionalism and Human Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
35. Jessup C. 1956. Transnational Law. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press. 113 pp.
36. Keck ME, Sikkink K. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press. 228 pp.
37. Keohane R. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
38. Keohane R, Nye J. 1974. Tyansgovernmental relations and international organizations. World Polit. 1:39-42
39. Keohane R, Nye J. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown. 273 pp.
40. Keohane R, Nye J. 1998. Power and interdependence in the information age. Foreign Aff. 77:81-94
41. Kingsbury B, Krisch N, Stewart RB. 2005. The emergence of global administrative law. Law Contemp. Probl. 68:15-61
42. Knop K. 2000. Here and there: international law in domestic courts. NY Univ. J. Int. Law Policy 32:501-35
43. Koh H. 2005. America's Jekyll-and-Hyde exceptionalism. See Ignatieff 2005, 5:145-47
44. Krahmann E. 2003. Multilevel Networks in European Foreign Policy. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate. 224 pp.
45. Krasner SD. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
46. Macey J. 2003. Regulatory globalization as a response to regulatory competition. Emory Law J. 52:1353
47. Martin L. 1992. Interests, power, and multilateralism. Int. Organ. 46:765-92
48. Martinez J. 2003. Towards an international judicial system. Stanford Law Rev. 56:429-529
49. McGinnis JO. 2003. The political economy of international antitrust harmonization. William & Mary Law Rev. 45:551
50. Michelman F. 2005. Integrity-anxiety? See Ignatieff 2005, 9:241-77
51. Mulqueeny K. 2004. Regionalism, economic integration and legalisation in ASEAN: what space for environmental sustainability? Asia Pac. J. Environ. Law 8(1-2):5
52. Naim M. 2002. The fourth annual Grotius lecture: five wars of globalization. Am. Univ. Int. Law Rev. 18:1-18
53. Noah BA. 2000. Adverse drug reactions, harnessing experiential data to promote patient welfare. Catholic Univ. Law Rev.49:500-1
54. Nye J, Keohane R, eds. 1972. Transnational Relations and World Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press. 428 pp.
55. Park I. 2004. International finance and state sovereignty: Global governance in the international tax regime. Annu. Surv. Int. Comp. Law 10:167
56. Picciotto S. 1996-1997. Networks in international economic intergration: fragmented states and the dilemma of neo-liberalism. Northwest. J. Int. Law Bus. 17(1996-97):1014-56
57. Picciotto S. 2000.Liberalization and democratization: the forum and the hearth in the era of cosmopolitan post-industrial capitalism. Law Contemp. Probl. 63:157-78
58. Piilola A. 2003. Assessing theories of global governance: A case study of international antitrust regulation. Stanford J. Int. Law 39:208
59. Pollack M, Shaffer G.2001. Transatlantic Governance in the Global Economy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. 368 pp.
60. Porter T. 1993. States, Markets, and Regimes in Global Finance. Basingstoke: Macmillan/New York: St.Martins
61. Posner E.2005. International law and the disaggregated state. Fla. State Univ.Law Rev. 32:842
62. Powell W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Res. Org. Behav. 12:295-336
63. Raustiala K. 2002. The architecture of international cooperation: transgovernmental networks and the future of international law. Va J. Int. Law 43:1-92
64. Risse-Kappen T. 1995. Introduction. In Transnational Relations Back In, ed. T Risse-Kappen. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press. 323 pp.
65. Saba J. 2002. Aviation safety in crisis: the option of the international financial facility for aviation safety. Transp. Law J.30:1
66. Sabel CF, Simon WH. 2004. Destabilization rights: how public law litigation succeeds. Harvard Law Rev. 117:1015-101
67. Sabel CF, Zeitlin H. 2006. Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the European Union. Presented at ARENA Seminar, Cent. Eur. Stud., Univ. Oslo, June 13. http://www.arena.uio.no/events/seminarpapers/2006/Zeitlin_June06.pdf
68. Slaughter AM. 1995. Liberal international relations theory and international economic law. Am. Univ. J. Int. Law Policy 10:717-43
69. Slaughter AM. 1997. The real new order. Foreign Aff. 76:183-97
70. Slaughter AM. 2000a. Governing the global economy through government networks. In The Role of Law in International Politics. Essays in International Relations and International Law, ed. M Byers, 9:177-205. Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
71. Slaughter AM. 2000b. Judicial globalization. Va. J. Int. Law 40:1103-24
72. Slaughter AM. 2001. The accountability of government networks. Indiana J. Global Legal Stud. 8:347, 350-55
73. Slaughter AM. 2003. Global government networks, global information agencies, and disaggregated democracy. Mich. J. Int. Law 24:1047
74. Slaughter AM. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. 368 pp.
75. Slaughter AM. 2005. A brave new judicial world. See Ignatieff 2005, 10:277-304
76. Smitherman CW. 2004. The future of global competition governance: lessons from the transatlantic. Am. Univ. Int. Law Rev. 19:770
77. Spiro P. 2004. Disaggregating U.S. interests in international law. Law Contemp. Probl. 67:197
78. Steiner HJ, Vagts DF. 1976. Transnational Legal Problems. Mineola, NY: Found. Press. 1429 pp. 2nd ed.
79. Stewart R. 2003. Administrative law in the twenty-first century. NY Univ. Law Rev. 78:455
80. Strahelevitz L. 2005. A social networks theory of privacy. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 72:919-88
81. Tarullo D. 2004. The limits of institutional design: implementing the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention. Va. J. Int. Law 44:701
82. Waters M. 2005. Mediating norms and identity: the role of transnational judicial dialogue in creating and enforcing international law. Georgetown Law J. 93:487-574
83. Whytock C. 2005. A rational design theory of transgovernmentalism: the case of E.U.-U.S. merger review cooperation. Boston Univ. Int. Law J. 23:51
84. Winter R. 1977. State law, shareholder protection, and the theory of the corporation. J. Legal Stud. 6:251
85. Woods N, ed. 2000. The Political Economy of Globalization. London: Macmillan
86. Young OR. 1997. Rights, rules, and resources in world affairs. In Global Governance: Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience, ed. O Young, 1: 1-23. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 364 pp.
87. Zaring D. 2005. Informal procedure, hard and soft, in international administration. Chicago J. Int. Law 5:547