Allocentric visual cues influence online Limb adjustments

Motor Control

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 54-70

  Heath, Matthew ^a   Neely, Kristina ^a   Binsted, Gordon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Illusions; M ller Lyer; Online corrections; Reaching; Visually guided

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE HAND COORDINATION; GAZE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; MOTOR CONTROL; NORMAL HUMAN; ONLINE SYSTEM; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BIOMECHANICS; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSORY DEPRIVATION;

EID: 33846270741     PISSN: 10871640     EISSN: 15432696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J.F.X., & Goodale, M.A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679-685.
2. Berkinblit, M.B., Fookson, O.I., Smetanin, B., Adamovich S.V., & Poizner, H. (1995). The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and remembered targets. Experimental Brain Research, 107, 326-330.
3. Bernardis, P., Knox, P., & Bruno, N. (2005). How does action resist visual illusion? Uncorrected oculomotor information does not account for accurate pointing in peripersonal space. Experimental Brain Research, 162, 133-144.
4. Binsted, G., & Elliott, D. (1999). Ocular perturbations and retinal/ extraretinal information: the coordination of saccadic and manual movements. Experimental Brain Research, 127, 193-206.
5. Binsted, G., & Heath, M. (2004). Can the motor system utilize a stored representation to control movement? A commentary on Glover. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 27, 25-27.
6. Binsted, G., & Heath, M. (2005). No evidence of a lower visual field specialization for visuomotor performance. Experimental Brain Research, 162, 89-94.
7. Brenner, E., & Smeets, J.B.J. (1996). Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Neuropsychologia, 111, 473-476.
8. Bridgeman, B., Perry, S., & Anand, S. (1997). Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 456-469.
9. Bridgeman, B., & Pacla, M. (1980). The role of microsaccades in high acuity observational tasks. Vision Research, 20, 813-817.
10. Bryden, M.P. (1977). Measuring handedness with questionnaires. Neuropsychologia, 15, 617-624.
11. Carlton, L.G. (1981). Visual information: The control of aiming movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 87-93.
12. Conti, P., & Beaubaton, D. (1980). Role of structured visual field and visual reafference in accuracy of pointing movements. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 239-244.
13. Daprati, E., & Gentilucci, M. (1997). Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1577-1582.
14. de Grave, D.D.J., Brenner, E., & Smeets, J.B.J. (2004). Illusions as a tool to study the coding of pointing movements. Experimental Brain Research, 155, 56-62.
15. Ditchburn, R.W., & Ginsborg, F.L. (1952). Vision with a stabilized retinal image. Nature, 170, 36-37.
16. Elliott, D., Heath, M., Binsted, G., Ricker, K.L., Roy, E.A., & Chua, R. (1999). Goal-directed aiming: Correcting a force specification error with the right and left hands. Journal of Motor Behavior, 31, 309-324.
17. Elliott, D., Helsen, W.F., & Chua, R. (2001). A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 342-357.
18. Elliott, D., & Lee, T.D. (1995). The role of target information on manual-aiming bias. Psychological Research, 58, 2-9.
19. Engbert, R., & Mergenthaler, K. (2006). Microsaccades are triggered by lower retinal image. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 7192-7197.
20. Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision Research, 43, 1035-1045.
21. Engel, K.C., Anderson, J.H., & Soechting, J.F. (2000). Similarity in the response of smooth pursuit and manual tracking to a change in the direction of target motion. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84, 1149-1156.
22. Franz, V.H. (2003). Planning versus online control: dynamic illusion effects in grasping? Spatial Vision, 16, 211-233.
23. Gentilucci, M., Chieffi, S., Daprati, E., Saetti, M.C., & Toni, I. (1996). Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia, 34, 369-376.
24. Gentilucci, M., Chieffi, S., Scarpa, M., & Castiello, U. (1992). Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: effects of visual perturbation. Behavioral Brain Research, 15, 71-82.
25. Gentilucci, M., Daprati, E., Gangitano, M., & Toni, I. (1997). Eye position tunes the contribution of allocentric and egocentric information to target localization in human goal-directed arm movements. Neuroscience Letters, 222, 123-126.
26. Glover, S. (2004). Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 3-78.
27. Glover, S., & Dixon, P. (2001). Motor adaptation to an optical illusion. Experimental Brain Research, 137, 254-258.
28. Goodale, M.A., Pelisson, D., & Prablanc, D. (1986). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320, 748-750.
29. Goodale, M.A., Westwood, D.A., & Milner, A.D. (2004). Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action. Progress in Brain Research, 144, 131-144.
30. Handlovsky, I., Hansen, S., Lee, T.D., & Elliott, D. (2004). The Ebbinghaus illusion affects on-line movement control. Neuroscience Letters, 366, 308-311.
31. Heath, M. (2005). Role of limb and target vision in the online control of memory-guided reaches. Motor Control, 9, 281-309.
32. Heath, M., Hodges, N.J., Chua, R., & Elliott, D. (1998). On-line control of rapid aiming movements: Unexpected target perturbations and movement kinematics. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 163-173.
33. Heath, M., & Rival, C. (2005). Role of the visuomotor system in on-line attenuation of a premovement illusory bias in grip aperture. Brain and Cognition, 67, 111-114.
34. Heath, M., Rival, C., & Binsted, G. (2004a). Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture: Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion. Experimental Brain Research, 158, 378-384.
35. Heath, M., Rival, C., & Neely, K. (2006a). Visual feedback schedules influence visuomotor resistance to the Müller-Lyer illusion. Experimental Brain Research, 168, 348-356.
36. Heath, M., Rival, C., Neely, K., & Krigolson, O. (2006b). Müller-Lyer figures influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements. Experimental Brain Research, 169, 473-481.
37. Heath, M., Rival, C., Westwood, D.A. & Neely, K. (2005). Time course analysis of closed-and open-loop grasping of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 178-185.
38. Heath, M., Westwood, D.A., & Binsted, G. (2004b). The control of memory-guided reaching movements in peripersonal space. Motor Control, 8, 76-106.
39. Held, R., & Gottlieb, N. (1958). Technique for studying adaptation to disarranged hand-eye coordination. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8, 83-86.
40. Jackson, S.R., & Shaw, A. (2000). The Ponzo illusion affects grip-force but not grip-aperture scaling during prehension movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 418-423.
41. Krigolson, O., & Heath, M. (2004). Background visual cues and memory-guided reaches. Human Movement Science, 23, 861-877.
42. Krigolson, O., & Heath, M. (2006). A lower visual field advantage for endpoint stability but not online movement precision. Experimental Brain Research, 170, 127-135.
43. Lavrysen, A., Helsen, W.F., Elliott, D., Buckers, M.J., Feys, P., & Heremans, E. (2006). The type of visual information mediates eye and hand movement bias when aiming to a Müller-Lyer illusion. Experimental Brain Research, 174, 544-554.
44. Martinez-Conde, S., Macknik, S.L., Troncoso, X.G., & Dyar, T.A. (2006). Microsaccades counteract visual fading during fixation. Neuron, 49, 297-305.
45. Mendoza, J.E., Elliott, D., Meegan, D.V., Lyons, J.L., & Welsh, T.N. (2006). The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusions on the planning and control of manual aiming movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 412-422.
46. Meyer, D.A., Abrams, R.A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C.E., & Smith, J.E.K. (1988). Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review, 95, 340-370.
47. Milner, A.D., & Goodale, M.A. (1995). The visual brain in action. New York: Oxford University Press.
48. Paulignan, Y., MacKenzie, C., Marteniuk, R., & Jeannerod, M. (1991). Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 1. The effects of changing object position. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 501-512.
49. Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R.G., & Levesque, L. (1992). A sensorimotor basis for moto learning: Evidence indicating specificity of practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 557-575.
50. Redon, C., & Hay, L. (2005). Role of visual context and oculomotor conditions in pointing accuracy. Neuroreport, 16, 2065-2067.
51. Soechting, J.F., Engel, K., & Flanders, M. (2001). The Duncker illusion and eye-hand coordination. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85, 843-854.
52. Soechting, J.F., & Lacquaniti, F. (1983). Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. Journal of Neurophysiology, 49, 548-564.
53. Velay, J.L., & Beaubaton, D. (1986). Influence of visual context on pointing accuracy. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 6, 447-456.
54. Westwood, D.A., & Goodale, M.A. (2003). Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action. Spatial Vision, 16, 243-254.
55. Westwood, D.A., Heath, M., & Roy, E.A. (2000). The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 134, 456-463.
56. Westwood, D.A., Heath, M., & Roy, E.A. (2001a). The accuracy of manual-aiming movements in brief delay conditions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 304-310.
57. Westwood, D.A., Heath, M., & Roy, E.A. (2003). No evidence for accurate visuomotor memory: Systematic and variable error in memory-guided reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 127-133.
58. Westwood, D.A., McEachern, T., & Roy, E.A. (2001b). Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure. Experimental Brain Research, 141, 166-173.
59. Woodworth, R.S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review, 3, 1-114.