The political economy of education policy: The case of class size reduction

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 120-152

  Mitchell, Douglas E ^a   Mitchell, Ross E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846172885     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327930PJE7804_07     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Achilles, C. M. (1999). Let’s put kids first, finally: Getting class size right. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
2. Bain, H. P., Lintz, N., & Word, E. (1989). A study of fifty effective teachers whose class average gain scores ranked in the top 15% of each of four school types in Project STAR. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
3. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital. New York: Columbia University Press.
4. Boadway, R. (1997). Public economics and the theory of public policy. Canadian Journal of Economics, 30(4a), 753–772.
5. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.
6. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
7. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.
8. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1986). Democracy and capitalism: Property, community, and the contradictions of modern social thought. New York: Basic Books.
9. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Schooling in capitalist America revisited. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 1–18.
10. Bozeman, B. (2002). Public-value failure: When efficient markets may not do. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 145–161.
11. Brewer, D. J., Krop, C., Gill, B. P., & Reichardt, R. (1999). Estimating the cost of national class size reductions under different policy alternatives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 179–192.
12. Brown, D. K. (2001). The social sources of educational credentialism: Status cultures, labor markets, and organizations. Sociology of Education (Extra Issue), 2001, 19–34.
13. Cahen, L. S., Filby, N., McCutcheon, G., & Kyle, D. W. (1983). Class size and instruction. New York: Longman.
14. Carnoy, M. (1972). The political economy of education. In T. LaBelle (Ed.), Education and development in Latin America and the Caribbean. Los Angeles: UCLA Latin American Center.
15. Carnoy, M. (Ed.). (1975). Schooling in a corporate society. New York: McKay.
16. Carnoy, M. (1985). The political economy of education. International Social Science Journal, 37(2), 157–173.
17. Carnoy, M., & Levin, H. M. (1985). Schooling and work in the democratic state. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18. Cibulka, J. G. (2001). The changing role of interest groups in education: Nationalization and the new politics of education productivity. Educational Policy, 15(1), 12–40.
19. Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1983). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda-building (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120.
21. Collins, R. (1979). The credential society: An historical sociology of education and stratification. San Diego, CA: Academic.
22. Cuban, L., & Shipps, D. (Eds.). (2000). Reconstructing the common good in education: Coping with intractable American dilemmas. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23. Edelman, M. J. (1985). The symbolic uses of politics (2nd ed.). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
24. Edelman, M. J. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Ehrenberg, R. G., Brewer, D. J., Gamoran, A., & Willms, J. D. (2001). Class size and student achievement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(1), 1–30.
26. Elder, C. D., & Cobb, R. W. (1983). The political uses of symbols. New York: Longman.
27. Elmore, R. F. (1984). The political economy of state influence. Education and Urban Society, 16(2), 125–144.
28. Finn, J. D. (1998). Class size and students at risk: What is known? What is next? Paper commissioned by the National Institute on the Education of At-Risk Students, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
29. Folger, J. (Issue Ed.). (1989). Peabody Journal of Education, 67(1), 75–84 (1992).
30. Foshay, A. W. (1973). Sources of school practice. In J. I. Goodlad & H. G. Shane (Eds.), The elementary school in the United States: The seventy-second yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II, pp. 173–197). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Galton, M. (Guest Ed.). (1998). International Journal of Educational Research, 29(8), 689–818.
32. Glass, G. V., Cahen, L. S., Smith, M. L., & Filby, N. N. (1982). School class size: Research and policy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33. Glass, G. V., & Smith, M. L. (1979). Meta-analysis of research on class size and achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1(1), 2–16.
34. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1994). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361–396.
35. Grissmer, D. (Guest Ed.). (1999). Educational Evaluation and policy Analysis, 21(2: Special issue—Class size: Issues and new findings), 93–248.
36. Grubb, W. N., & Lazerson, M. (1982). Broken promises: How Americans fail their children. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Guthrie, J. W. (1985). The educational policy consequences of economic instability: The emerging political economy of American education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 7(4), 319–332.
38. Guthrie, J. W. (1990). The evolving political economy of education and the implications for educational evaluation. Educational Review, 42(2), 109–131.
39. Guthrie, J. W., & Koppich, J. (1988). Exploring the political economy of national education reform. In W. L. Boyd & C. T. Kerchner (Eds.), The politics of excellence and choice in education: 1987 yearbook of the Politics of Education Association (pp. 25–47). New York: Falmer.
40. Gutmann, A. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41. Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141–164.
42. Hanushek, E. A. (1998). The evidence on class size (Occasional Paper No. 98-1). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester, W. Allen Wallis Institute of Political Economy.
43. Hanushek, E. A. (1999). Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and from other investigations of class size effects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 143–163.
44. Hanushek, E. A. (2000). Evidence, politics, and the class size debate. In The class size policy debate (Working Paper No. 121) (pp. 27–46). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
45. Harris, D., & Plank, D. N. (2000). Making policy choices: Is class-size reduction the best alternative? In S. W. M. Laine & J. G. Ward (Eds.), Using what we know: A review of the research on implementing class-size reduction initiatives for state and local policymakers (pp. 21–33). Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
46. Hedges, L. V., & Stock, W. (1983). The effects of class size: An examination of rival hypotheses. American Educational Research Journal, 20(1), 63–85.
47. Hertling, E., Leonard, C., Lumsden, L., & Smith, S. C. (with a contribution by L. O. Picus). (2000, Spring). Policy report: Class size. http://www.eric.uoregon.edu/publications/pub_policy.html
48. Heyneman, S. P. (2000). From the party/state to multiethnic democracy: Education and social cohesion in Europe and Central Asia. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 173–191.
49. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. House, E. R. (1997). Schools for sale: Why free market policies won’t improve America’s schools, and what will. New York: Teachers College Press.
51. Hummel-Rossi, B., & Ashdown, J. (2002). The state of cost–benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses in education. Review of Educational Research, 72(1), 1–30.
52. Johnston, J. M. (1989). Teacher perceptions of changes in teaching when they have a small class or an aide. Peabody Journal of Education, 67(1), 106–122 (published in 1992).
53. Katznelson, I., & Weir, W. (1985). Schooling for all: Class, race, and the decline of the democratic ideal. New York: Basic Books.
54. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
55. Kingston, P. W. (1986). Theory at risk: Accounting for the excellence movement. Sociological Forum, 1(4), 632–656.
56. Krueger, A. B. (2000). Understanding the magnitude and effect of class size on student achievement. In The class size policy debate (Working Paper No. 121) (pp. 5–26). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
57. Labaree, D. F. (1997). How to succeed in school without really learning: The credentials race in American education. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
58. Labaree, D. F. (2000). No exit: Public education as an inescapably public good. In L. Cuban & D. Shipps (Eds.), Reconstructing the common good in education: Coping with intractable American dilemmas (pp. 110–129). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
59. Laine, S. W. M., & Ward, J. G. (Eds.). (2000). Using what we know: A review of the research on implementing class-size reduction initiatives for state and local policymakers. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
60. Levin, H. M. (1987). Education as a public and private good. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 6(4), 628–641.
61. Loveless, T. (Ed.). (2001). The great curriculum debate: How should we teach reading and math? Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
62. Lutz, F. W. (Issue Ed.). (1986). Peabody Journal of Education, 63(4: Reforming education in the 1980s) (Published in 1988).
63. McDonnell, L. M., & Elmore, R. F. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 133–152.
64. McDonnell, L. M., & Fuhrman, S. (1986). The political context of school reform. In V. D. Mueller & M. P. McKeown (Eds.), The fiscal, legal, and political aspects of state reform of elementary and secondary education (pp. 43–64). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
65. McNeil, L. M. (Ed.). (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.
66. Meyer, J. (2000). Reflections on education as transcendence. In L. Cuban & D. Shipps (Eds.), Reconstructing the common good in education: Coping with intractable American dilemmas (pp. 206–222). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
67. Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
68. Mitchell, D. E. (1996). Institutional theory and the social structure of education. In R. L. Crowson, W. L. Boyd, & H. M. Mawhinney (Eds.), Politics of education and the new institutionalism: Reinventing the American school: The 1995 yearbook of the Politics of Education Association (pp. 167–88). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
69. Mitchell, D. E. (1998). A policy framework for resource allocation. In W. T. Hartman & W. L. Boyd (Eds.), Resource allocation and productivity in education: Theory and practice (pp. 219–238). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
70. Mitchell, D. E., Carson, C., & Badarak, G. (1989). How changing class size affects classrooms and students. Riverside: University of California, Riverside, California Educational Research Cooperative.
71. Mitchell, D. E., & Mitchell, R. E. (1999). Class size. Riverside: University of California, California Educational Research Cooperative.
72. Mitchell, D. E., & Mitchell, R. E. (2000). Class size: An amendment reflecting further research on state policies. Riverside: University of California, California Educational Research Cooperative.
73. Mitchell, R. E. (2000, August). Early elementary class-size reduction: A neo-institutional analysis of the social, political, and economic influences on state-level policymaking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.
74. Mitchell, R. E. (2001a, March 1). Class size reduction policy in the national context. Unpublished manuscript, Graduate School of Education, University of California, Riverside.
75. Mitchell, R. E. (2001b, September). Class size reduction policy: Evaluating the impact on student achievement in California (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Riverside, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(07), 2305A [UMI No. 3021397].
76. Molnar, A., Smith, P., Zahorik, J., Palmer, A., Halbach, A., & Ehrle, K. (1999). Evaluating the SAGE program: A pilot program in targeted pupil–teacher reduction in Wisconsin. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 165–177.
77. NEA Research. (1988). Public opinion on class size: A 27-year review. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
78. Ogawa, R. T., Huston, D. & Stine, D. E. (1999). California’s class size reduction initiative: Differences in teacher experience and qualifications across districts. Educational Policy, 13(5), 659–673.
79. Parrish, T., & Brewer, D. (with C. Driver, E. Hawkins, L. Kuo, I. Lam, S. Range, C. Krop, B. Gill, R. Reichardt, J. Goodwin, H. Espinosa, T. Kaganoff, & M. W. Kirst). (2000, February 1). The costs of class size reduction policies in the context of rising enrollments: Final report (OERI Commissioned Report). Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
80. Parsons, T. (1959). The school class as a social system: Some of its functions in American society. Harvard Educational Review, 29, 297–318.
81. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.
82. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
83. Ritter, G. W., & Boruch, R. F. (1999). The political and institutional origins of randomized controlled trial on elementary school class size: Tennessee’s Project STAR. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 111–125.
84. Robinson, G. E., & Wittebols, J. H. (1986). Class size research: A related cluster analysis for decision making. Arlington, VA: Education Research Services.
85. Ross, D. H., & McKenna, B. H. (1955). Class size: The multi-million dollar question (Study 11). New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, The Institute of Administrative Research.
86. Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1980). Meta-analysis of research on class size and its relationship to attitudes and instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 17(4), 419–433.
87. Spring, J. (1998). Education and the rise of the global economy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
88. Stasz, C., & Stecher, B. M. (2000). Teaching mathematics and language arts in reduced size and non-reduced size classrooms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(4), 313–329.
89. Stecher, B., Bohrnstedt, G., Kirst, M., McRobbie, J., & Williams, T. (2001). Class-size reduction in California: A story of hope, promise, and unintended consequences. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(9), 670–674.
90. Stellar, A. W. (1986). Implications for programmatic excellence and equity. In V. D. Mueller & M. P. McKeown (Eds.), The fiscal, legal, and political aspects of state reform of elementary and secondary education (pp. 65–118). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.
91. Stone, C. N., Henig, J. R., Jones, B. D., & Pierannunzi, C. (2001). Building civic capacity: The politics of reforming urban schools. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
92. Thurow, L. C. (1977). Education and economic equality. In J. Karabel & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 325–335). New York: Oxford University Press.
93. Timar, T. B., & Kirp, D. L. (1988). Managing educational excellence. New York: Falmer.
94. Tobin, J. J., Wu, D. Y. H., & Davidson, D. H. (1987). Class size and student/teacher ratios in the Japanese preschool. Comparative Education Review, 31(4), 533–549.
95. U.S. Department of Education. (2000, September). The class-size reduction program: Boosting student achievement in schools across the nation. A first-year report. Washington, DC: Author.
96. Weber, M. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
97. World Bank. (1995). Priorities and strategies for education: A World Bank review. Washington, DC: Author.