The changing role of interest groups in education: Nationalization and the new politics of education productivity

Educational Policy

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 12-40

  Cibulka, James G ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035531919     PISSN: 08959048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0895904801015001002     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America's public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Berry, J. M. (1989). Subgovernments, issue networks, and political conflict. In R. A. Harris & S. M. Milkis (Eds.), Remaking American politics (pp. 239-260). Boulder, CO: Westview.
3. Boyd, W. L. (1976). The public, the professionals, and educational policy making: Who governs. Teachers College Record, 77(4), 539-577.
4. Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
6. Cibulka, J. G., & Olsen, F. I. (1993). The organization and politics of the Milwaukee public school system, 1920-1980. In J. Rury & F. A. Cassell (Eds.), Seeds of crisis: Public schooling in Milwaukee since 1920 (pp. 73-109). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7. Cigler, A. J., & Loomis, B. A. (1995). Interest group politics (4th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
8. Firestone, W., Fuhrman, S., & Kirst, M. (1990). An overview of education reform since 1983. In J. Murphy (Eds.), The educational reform movement of the 1980s (pp. 349-364). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
9. Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (Ed.), The new American political system (pp. 88, 103, ff). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
10. Hofstadter, R. (1955). The age of reform. New York: Vintage Books.
11. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
12. Lowi, T. J. (1964). American business and public policy, case studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16, 677-715.
13. Lowi, T. J. (1969). The end of liberalism: Ideology, policy, and the crisis of public authority. New York: Norton.
14. Lowi, T. J. (1995). The end of the Republican era. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
15. Majone, G. (1996). Public policy and administration: Ideas, interests, and institutions. In R. E. Goodwin & H. Klingemann (Eds.), A new handbook of political science (pp. 610-627). New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Marshall, C., Mitchell, D., & Wirt, F. (1989). Culture and American policy in the United States. New York: Falmer Press.
17. Martin, W. (1996). With God on our side: The rise of the Religious Right in America. New York: Broadway Books.
18. McCarthy, M. M. (1996). People of faith as political activists in public schools. Education and Urban Society, 28(3), 308-326.
19. McConnell, G. (1967). Private power and American democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
20. Mirel, J. (1993). The rise and fall of an urban school system: Detroit, 1907-1981. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
21. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A Nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. A report to the nation and the Secretary of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
22. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Peterson, P. E. (1985). The politics of school reform 1870-1940. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
24. Peterson, P. E. (1995). The price of federalism. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
25. Peterson, P. E. (1974). The politics of American education. In F. Kerlinger & J. Carroll (Eds.), Review of research in eduction (vol. 2, pp. 348-389). Ithasa, II: Peacock.
26. Public Agenda. (2000a). Education: Major Proposals. But people also want higher standards and more discipline, and some groups say these changes would help schools more than money [Online]. Retrieved July 8, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www. publicagenda.org/major_proposals_detail.cfm?issue_type=education&list=3.html
27. Public Agenda. (2000b). Education: Major proposals. Many Americans say they support the presence of religious ideas in public schools [Online]. Retrieved July 8, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.publicagenda.org/issues/major_proposals_detail.cfm? issue_type=education&list=18.html
28. Public Agenda. (2000c). Education: Major proposals. Most Americans say that setting academic guidelines improves students' performance [Online]. Retrieved July 8, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.publicagenda.org/issues/major_proposals_detail.cfm? issue_type=education&list=8.html
29. Public Agenda. (2000d). Education: Major Proposals. Most Americans support increased funding for schools and say they would provide higher taxes to provide them [Online]. Retrieved July 8, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www publicagenda.org/issues/major_proposals_detail. cfm?issue_type=education&list=2.html
30. Public Agenda. (2000e). Education: Major proposals. Most Americans support making it easier to remove principals, but people are divided on tying financial incentives to student performance and opening teaching to those who lack formal training [Online]. Retrieved July 8, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http:/www.publicagenda.org/issues/major_proposals_detail. cfm?issue_type=education&list=6.html
31. Public Agenda. (2000f). Education: Major proposals. Most Americans support raising standards for promotion from grade to grade, even if more students fail [Online]. Retrieved July 8, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.publicagenda.org/issues/major_proposals_detail.cfm?issue_type= education&list=9.html
32. Public Agenda. (2000g). Education: A nation divided? Professors and employers are far more likely than public school teachers to say that private schools have higher standards and that a high school diploma does not guarantee the basics [Online]. Retrieved July 8, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.publicagenda.org/issues/nation_divided_detail.cfm? issue_type=education&list=8.html
33. Public Agenda. (2000h). Education: A nation divided? Students, teachers, and the general public agree that public schools should emphasize basic academic skills, computer skills, and values like respect and hard work [Online]. Retrieved July 8,2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.publicagenda.org/issues/major_proposals_detail.cfm?issue_ type=education&list=9.html
34. Public Agenda. (2000i). Education: People's chief concerns. Confidence in public schools has declined since the 1970s [Online]. Retrieved July 8, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.publicagenda.org/issues/pcc_detail.cfm?issuetype=education&list= 3.html
35. Public Agenda. (2000j). Education: People's chief concerns: Most Americans say minorities receive an equal education in local schools, but more than half of Black parents call underachievement among Black students a crisis [Online]. Retrieved July 8, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.publicagenda.org/issues/pcc_detail.cfm?issue_ type=education&list=6.html
36. Public Agenda. (2000k). Survey organization: Public Agenda, sponsored by Education Week and Pew Memorial Trusts [Online]. Retrieved July 8, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.publicagenda.org/major_proposals_detail2.cfm?issue_type= education& proposal_graphic=mp6.gi.html
37. Purdum, T. S. (2000, July 4). Shift in the mix alters the face of California. The New York Times, pp. A1, A12.
38. Ricci, D. M. (1993). The transformation of American politics: The new Washington and the rise of think tanks. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39. Ripley, R. B., & Franklin, G. A. (1987). Congress, the bureaucracy, and public policy (4th ed.). Chicago: Dorsey Press.
40. Salisbury, R. H. (1992). Interests and institutions: Substance and structure in American politics. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
41. Smith, J. A. (1991). The idea brokers: Think tanks and the rise of the new policy elite. New York: The Free Press.
42. Stefancic, J., & Delgado, R. (1996). No mercy: How conservative think tanks and foundations changed America's social agenda. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
43. Stone, D. (1996). Capturing the political imagination: Think tanks and the policy process. London: Frank Kass.
44. Tyack, D. B. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1990). Marital status and living arrangements: March 1989. Current population reports, population characteristics (Series P-20, No. 445). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
46. Weiss, C. H. (1992). Helping governments think: Functions and consequences of policy analysis organizations. In C. Weiss (Ed.), Organizations for policy analysis: Helping government think (pp. 1-20). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47. Wilson, J. Q. (1980). The politics of regulation. In J. Q. Wilson (Ed.), The politics of regulation (pp. 357-394). New York: Basic Books.
48. Wong, K. K. (1999). Funding public schools: Politics and policies. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
49. Zeigler, L. H., Jennings, M. K., & Peak, G. W. (1974). Governing American schools: Political interaction in local school districts. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.
50. Zeigler, L. H., Kehoe, E., & Reisman, J. (1985). City managers and school superintendents: Response to community conflict. New York: Praeger.