Clinical performance and SEM evaluation of direct composite restorations in primary molars

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 255-261

  Puppin Rontani, Regina Maria ^a,b   De Góes, Mario Fernando ^a   Voelske, Cleane Elizabete ^d   García Godoy, Franklin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b Undergraduate and Postgraduate Programs   (Brazil)

^c NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Nova Southeastern University ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE PLUS; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE PLUS; SILICON DIOXIDE; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ARTICLE; CHILD; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; EVALUATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH PERMEABILITY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN PERMEABILITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 33750340592     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Vann WF Jr, Barkmeier WW Mahler DB. Assessing composite resin wear in primary molars: Four-year findings. J Dent Res 1988;67:876-879.
2. Eidelman E, Fuks A, Chosack A. A clinical, radiographic, and SEM evaluation of class 2 composite restorations in primary teeth. Oper Dent 1989;14:58-63.
3. Holan G., Chosack A., Casamassimo PS, Eidelman E. Marginal leakage of impregnated Class 2 composites in primary molars: An in vivo study. Oper Dent 1992;17:122-128.
4. Holan G, Chosack A, Eidelman E. Clinical evaluation of class II combined amalgam-composite restorations in primary molars after 6 to 30 months. J Dent Child 1996;63:341-345.
5. Brännström M. Dentin and pulp in restorative dentistry. Castelnuovo: Wolfe Medical Publications, 1981; 9-14.
6. Warfvinge T, Dahlen G, Bergenholtz E. Dental pulp response to bacterial cell wall material. J Dent Res 1985;64:1046-1050.
7. Fusayama T. Factors and prevention of pulp irritation by adhesive composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1987;18:633-641.
8. Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J, III. Interfacial morphology of resin composite and shiny erosion lesions. Am J Dent 1992;5:315-317.
9. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Kugel G, Davidson CL. Dentin infiltration by three adhesive systems in clinical and laboratory conditions. Am J Dent 1996;9:240-244.
10. Uno S, Finger WJ. Function of the hybrid zone as a stress-absorbing layer in resin-dentin bonding. Quintessence Int 1995;26:733-738.
11. Araújo FB, García-Godoy F, Issão M. A comparison of three resin bonding agents to primary tooth dentin. Pediatr Dent 1997;19:253-257.
12. Harnirattisai C, Inokoshi S, Shimada Y, Hosoda H. Interfacial morphology of an adhesive composite resin and etched caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 1992;17:222-228.
13. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Mason PN. Micromorphologic relationship between resin and dentin in Class II restorations: An in vivo and in vitro investigation by scanning electron microscopy. Quintessence Int 1994;25:861-866.
14. Van der Linden F, Duterlou HS. Development of the human dentition. An atlas. Hagerstown: Harper and Row, 1976.
15. Mjör IA. A regulatory approach to the formulation of assessment criteria for posterior composite resins. Quintessence Int 1987;18:537-542.
16. de Góes MF, Pachane GC, Garcia-Godoy F. Resin bond strength with different methods to remove excess water from the dentin. Am J Dent 1997;10:298-301.
17. Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Yildiz E, Yucel T, Vanherle G. The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 1996;4:167-173.
18. Araújo FB, Barata JS, Costa C, García-Godoy F. Clinical, radiographical and histological evaluation of direct capping with a resin adhesive in primary teeth. J Dent Res 1997;76:1327-1327 (Abstr # 1327).
19. Hebling J. Dentin-pulp complex response to the application of an adhesive system in deep cavities with or without pulp exposure. Histopathologic evaluation in human teeth. 1997. 191p. Thesis. Faculty of Dentistry of Araraquara. Federal Paulista University (In Portuguese).
20. Oldenburg TR, Vann WF Jr, Dilley DC. Composite restorations for primary molars: Results after four years. Pediatr Dent 19985;7:96-103.
21. Oldenburg TR, Vann WF Jr, Dilley DC. Comparison of composite and amalgam in posterior teeth of children. Dent Mater 1987;3:182-186.
22. Tonn EM, Ryge G. Clinical evaluation of composite resin restorations in primary molars: A 4-year follow-up study. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;117:603-606.
23. Barr-Algholme M, Oden A, Dahllof G, Moder T. A two-year clinical study of light-cured composite and amalgam restorations in primary molars. Dent Mater 1991;7:230-233.
24. Geurtsen W, Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of class I and class II composite restorations. J Dent 1997; 25:229-232.
25. Gwinnett AJ, García-Godoy F. Effect of etching time and acid concentration on resin shear bond strength to primary tooth enamel. Am J Dent 1992;5:237-239.
26. Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 1997;76:1799-1807.
27. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Factors effecting dental composite wear in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 38:303-313.
28. Nör J, Feigal RJ, Dennison JB, Edwards CA. Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of the resin-dentin interface in primary and permanent teeth. J Dent Res 1996; 75:1396-1403.
29. Hosoya Y, Nishiguchi M, Kashiwabara Y, Horiuchi A, Goto G. Comparison of two dentin adhesives to primary vs. permanent bovine dentin. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1997; 22:69-76.
30. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro demineralized dentin with phosphoric and maleic acid. J Dent Child 1997; 64:17-21.
31. Pascon FM, Kantovits KR, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Borges AFS, Silva TN, Puppin-Rontani RM, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results. J Dent 2006;34: 381-388.