Introduction to lumbar total disc replacement: Factors that affect tribological performance

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology

Volumn 220, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 775-786

  Hall, R M ^a   Brown, T D ^b   Fisher, J ^a   Ingham, E ^a   Mendoza, S A ^b   Mayer, H M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c Orthozentrum München ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Biotribology; Large joint replacement; Lumbar spine; Preclinical testing; Total disc replacement; Wear

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; JOINT PROSTHESES; TRIBOLOGY; WEAR OF MATERIALS;

BIOTRIBOLOGY; LARGE JOINT REPLACEMENT; LUMBAR SPINE; PRECLINICAL TESTING; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT;

SURGERY;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; JOINT PROSTHESES; SURGERY; TRIBOLOGY; WEAR OF MATERIALS;

EID: 33846150016     PISSN: 13506501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/13506501JET187     Document Type: Review

References (107)

1. Deyo, R. A. and Weinstein, J. N. Low back pain. New Engl. J. Med., 2001, 344, 363-370.
2. Frymoyer, J. W. and Cats-Baril, W. L. An overview of the incidences and costs of low back pain. Orthop. Clin. North Am., 1991, 22, 263-271.
3. Nachemson, A., Waddell, G., and Norlund, A. Epidemiology of neck and low back pain. In Neck and back pain: the scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis and treatment (Eds A. Nachemeson and E. Jonsson), 2000 (Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins, Philadelphia).
4. Maetzel, A. and Li, L. The economic burden of low back pain: a review of studies published between 1996 and 2001. Bailliere. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol., 2002, 16, 23-30.
5. Weinstein, J. N., Boden, S. D., and An, H. Emerging technology in spine: should we rethink the past or move forward in spite of the past? Spine, 2003, 28, S1.
6. Blumenthal, S. L., Ohnmeiss, D. D., Guyer, R., Hochschuler, S., McAfee, P., Garcia, R., Salib, R., Yuan, H., Lee, C., Bertagnoli, R., Bryan, U., and Winter, R. Artificial intervertebral discs and beyond: a North American spine society annual meeting symposium. Spine J., 2002, 2, 460-463.
7. Scott-Young, M. Artificial intervertebral discs and beyond. North American Spine Society, San Diego, 2003.
8. Santos, E. G., Polly, D. W., Mehbod, A. A., and Saleh, K. J. Disc arthroplasty: lessons learned from total joint arthroplasty. Spine J., 2004, 4, 182S-189S.
9. Buttner-Janz, K., Hochschuler, S. H., and McAfee, P. C. The artificial disc, 1st edition, 2003 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
10. McAfee, P. C. The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement. Spine J., 2004, 4, 177S-181S.
11. Polly, D. W. Jr. Adapting innovative motion-preserving technology to spinal surgical practice: what should we expect to happen? Spine, 2003, 28, S104-S109.
12. Villarraga, M. L. and Cripton, P. A. The clinical performance of UHMWPE in the spine. In The UHMWPE handbook: ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in total joint replacement, (Ed. S. M. Kurtz) 2004, pp. 219-242, (Elsevier Academic Press).
13. Cunningham, B. W., Orbegoso, C. M., Dmitriev, A. E., Hallab, N. J., Sefter, J. C., Asdourian, P., and McAfee, P. C. The effect of spinal instrumentation particulate wear debris. An in vivo rabbit model and applied clinical study of retrieved instrumentation cases. Spine J., 2003, 3, 19-32.
14. Hallab, N. J., Cunningham, B. W., and Jacobs, J. J. Spinal implant debris-induced osteolysis. Spine, 2003, 28, S125-S138.
15. Deyo, R. A., Nachemson, A., and Mirza, S. K. Spinal-fusion surgery - the case for restraint. New Engl. J. Med., 2004, 350, 722-726.
16. Andersson, G. B. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet, 1999, 354, 581-585.
17. Wipf, J. E. and Deyo, R. A. Low back pain. Med. Clin. North Am., 1995, 79, 231-246.
18. Boden, S. D., Davis, D. O., Dina, T. S., Patronas, N. J., and Wiesel, S. W. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J. Bone Jt Surg. Am., 1990, 72, 403-408.
19. Boden, S. D., Balderston, R. A., Heller, J. G., Hanley, E. N. Jr., and Zigler, J. E. An AOA critical issue. Disc replacements: this time will we really cure low-back and neck pain? J. Bone Jt Surg. Am., 2004, 86, 411-422.
20. Abraham, D. J., Herkowitz, H. N., and Katz, J. N. Indications for thoracic and lumbar spine fusion and trends in use. Orthop. Clin. North Am., 1998, 29, 803.
21. Gillet, P. The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J. Spinal Disord. Tech., 2003, 16, 338-345.
22. Bono, C. M. and Lee, C. Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the last twenty years: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome. Spine J., 2004, 29, 455-463.
23. Hing, K. A., Best, S. M., Tanner, K. E., Bonfield, W., and Revell, P. A. Mediation of bone ingrowth in porous hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 2004, 68, 187-200.
24. Burkus, J. K., Heim, S. E., Gornet, M. F., and Zdeblick, T. A. Is INFUSE bone graft superior to autograft bone? An integrated analysis of clinical trials using the LT-CAGE lumbar tapered fusion device. J. Spinal Disord. Tech., 2003, 16, 113-122.
25. Anderson, D. G. and Albert, T. J. Bone grafting, implants, and plating options for anterior cervical fusions. Orthop. Clin. North Am., 2002, 33, 317-328.
26. Meadows, G. R. Adjunctive use of ultraporous beta-tricalcium phosphate bone void filler in spinal arthrodesis. Orthopedics, 2002, 25, s579-s584.
27. Boden, S. D. Overview of the biology of lumbar spine fusion and principles for selecting a bone graft substitute. Spine, 2002, 27, S26-S31.
28. Ludwig, S. C., Kowalski, J. M., and Boden, S. D. Osteoinductive bone graft substitutes. Eur. Spine. J., 2000, 9(Suppl. 1), S119-S125.
29. Roussouly, P., Gollogly, S., Berthonnaud, E., and Dimnet, J. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine, 2005, 30, 346-353.
30. Lonstein, J. E., Denis, F., Perra, J. H., Pinto, M. R., Smith, M. D., and Winter, R. B. Complications associated with pedicle screws. J. Bone Jt Surg. Am., 1999, 81, 1519-1528.
31. Callaghan, J. P., Patla, A. E., and McGill, S. M. Low back three-dimensional joint forces, kinematics, and kinetics during walking. Clin. Biomech., 1999, 14, 203-216.
32. Ferguson, S. A., Gaudes-MacLaren, L. L., Marras, W. S., Waters, J.R., and Davis, K. G. Spinal loading when lifting from industrial storage bins. Ergonomics, 2002, 45, 399-414.
33. Rohlmannt, A., Claes, L. E., Bergmannt, G., Graichen, F., Neef, P., and Wilke, H. J. Comparison of intradiscal pressures and spinal fixator loads for different body positions and exercises. Ergonomics, 2001, 44, 781-794.
34. Rohlmann, A., Arntz, U., Graichen, F., and Bergmann, G. Loads on an internal spinal fixation device during sitting. J. Biomech., 2001, 34, 989-993.
35. Rohlmann, A., Graichen, F., Weber, U., and Bergmann, G. 2000 Volvo Award winner in biomechanical studies: Monitoring in vivo implant loads with a telemeterized internal spinal fixation device. Spine, 2000, 25, 2981-2986.
36. Rohlmann, A., Bergmann, G., and Graichen, F. Loads on internal spinal fixators measured in different body positions. Eur. Spine J., 1999, 8, 354-359.
37. Kumar, S., Moro, L., and Narayan, Y. A biomechanical analysis of loads on x-ray technologists: a field study. Ergonomics, 2003, 46, 502-517.
38. Fathallah, F. A., Marras, W. S., and Parnianpour, M. An assessment of complex spinal loads during dynamic lifting tasks. Spine, 1998, 23, 706-716.
39. Dennis, G. J. and Barrett, R. S. Spinal loads during individual and team lifting. Ergonomics, 2002, 45, 671-681.
40. Callaghan, J. P. and McGill, S. M. Low back joint loading and kinematics during standing and unsupported sitting. Ergonomics, 2001, 44, 280-294.
41. Frobin, W., Brinckmann, P., Leivseth, G., Biggemann, M., and Reikeras, O. Precision measurement of segmental motion from flexion-extension radiographs of the lumbar spine. Clin. Biomech. 1996, 11, 457-465.
42. Harada, M., Abumi, K., Ito, M., and Kaneda, K. Cineradiographic motion analysis of normal lumbar spine during forward and backward flexion. Spine, 2000, 25, 1932-1937.
43. McGregor, A. H., Anderton, L., Gedroyc, W. M., Johnson, J., and Hughes, S. P. The use of interventional open MRI to assess the kinematics of the lumbar spine in patients with spondylolisthesis. Spine, 2002, 27, 1582-1586.
44. Pearcy, M. J. and Tibrewal, S. B. Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography. Spine, 1984, 9, 582-587.
45. Pearcy, M., Portek, I., and Shepherd, J. Three-dimensional X-ray analysis of normal movement in the lumbar spine. Spine, 1984, 9, 294-297.
46. White, A. A. and Panjabi, M. Clinical biomechanics of the spine, 1991 (Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins, Philadelphia).
47. Gatton, M. L. and Pearcy, M. J. Kinematics and movement sequencing during flexion of the lumbar spine. Clin. Biomech., 1999, 14, 376-383.
48. Pearcy, M. J. and Bogduk, N. Instantaneous axes of rotation of the lumbar intervertebral joints. Spine, 1988, 13, 1033-1041.
49. Edwards, J. C., Sedgwick, A. D., and Willoughby, D. A. The formation of a structure with the features of synovial lining by subcutaneous injection of air: an in vivo tissue culture system. J. Pathol., 1981, 134, 147-156.
50. Aunoble, S., Donkersloot, P., and Le Huec, J. C. Dislocations with intervertebral disc prosthesis: two case reports. Eur. Spine J., 2004, 13, 464-467.
51. Kurtz, S. M., Patwardhan, A., van Ooij, A., Lorenz, M., Zindrick, M. R., O'Leary, P., Peloza, J., Ciccarelli, L., and Villarraga, M. L. What is the correlation of in vivo wear and fracture patterns with in vitro motion response. In Spine Arthroplasty 6: Global Symposium on Motion preservation technology, Montreal, Canada, 2006 (Spine Arthroplasty Society).
52. Kurtz, S. M., van Ooij, A., Peloza, J., Ciccarelli, L., Zeiger, A., and Villarraga, L. M. Wear and surface damage analysis of retrieved Charité total disc replacements. Spine Arthroplasty 5: Global Symposium on Motion preservation technology. New York City, USA, 2005 (Spine Arthroplasty Society).
53. Bertagnoli, R. and Kumar, S. Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur. Spine J., 2002, 11, S131-S136.
54. Cinotti, G., David, T., and Postacchini, F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine, 1996, 21: 995-1000.
55. Enker, P., Steffee, A., McMillin, C., Keppler, L., Biscup, R., and Miller, S. Artificial disc replacement. preliminary report with a 3-year minimum follow-up. Spine, 1993, 18, 1061-1070.
56. Griffith, S. L., Shelokov, A. P., Buttner-Janz, K., Le Maire, J. P., and Zeegers, W. S. A multicenter retrospective study of the clinical results of the LINK SB Charite intervertebral prosthesis. The initial European experience. Spine, 1994, 19, 1842-1849.
57. Hochschuler, S. H., Ohnmeiss, D. D., Guyer, R. D., and Blumenthal, S. L. Artificial disc: preliminary results of a prospective study in the United States. Eur. Spine J., 2002, 11, S106-S110.
58. Zeegers, W. S., Bohnen, L. M., Laaper, M., and Verhaegen, M. J. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charite III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur. Spine J., 1999, 8, 210-217.
59. De Kleuver, M., Oner, F. C., and Jacobs, W. C. Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain: background and a systematic review of the literature. Eur. Spine J., 2003, 12, 108-116.
60. McAfee, P. C., Fedder, I. L., Saiedy, S., Shucosky, E. M., and Cunningham, B. W. SB Charite disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center. J. Spinal Disord. Tech., 2003, 16, 424-433.
61. Blumenthal, S. L., Ohnmeiss, D. D., Guyer, R. D., and Hochschuler, S. H. Prospective study evaluating total disc replacement: preliminary results. J. Spinal Disord. Tech., 2003, 16, 450-454.
62. Lemaire, J. P., Skalli, W., Lavaste, F., Templier, A., Mendes, F., Diop, A., Santy, V., and Laloux, E. Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin. Orthop., 1997, 337, 64-76.
63. Link, H. D. History, design and biomechanics of the LINK SB Charite artificial disc. Eur. Spine J., 2002, 11, S98-S105.
64. van Ooij, A., Oner, F. C., and Verbout, A. J. Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc. J. Spinal Disord. Tech., 2003, 16, 369-383.
65. Hall, R. M., Fisher, J., and Ingham, E. Metal-on-poly versus metal-on-metal: fact versus fiction 1st Annual Spine Athroplasty Summit, Salt Lake City, 2006.
66. Zigler, J. E., Delamarter, R. B., Bae, H. W., Sachs, B. L., Rashbaum, R. F., Ohnmeiss, D. D., Kanim, L. E., and Pradhan, P. B. Lumbar total disc replacement: A 2 to 3 year report from 2 centers in the United States clinical trial for the Prodisc-II prosthesis. In Spine Arthroplasty 5: Global Symposium on Motion preservation technology. 2005, pp. 511-512 (Spine Arthroplasty Society, New York City, USA).
67. David, T. Lumbar disc prosthesis. Eur. Spine J., 1993, 1, 254-259.
68. Huang, R. C., Girardi, F. P., Cammisa, F. P. Jr., Tropiano, P., and Marnay, T. Long-term flexion-extension range of motion of the prodisc total disc replacement. J. Spinal Disord. Tech., 2003, 16, 435-440.
69. Tropiano, P., Huang, R. C., Girardi, F. P., and Marnay, T. Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. J. Spinal Disord. Tech., 2003, 16, 362-368.
70. Cunningham, B. W., Gordon, J. D., Dmitriev, A. E., Hu, N., and McAfee, P. C. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine, 2003, 28, S110-S117.
71. Lorenz, M. A., O'Leary, P., Nicolakis, M., Ghanayem, A. J., Voronov, L. I., Zindrick, M. R., and Patwardhan, A. Effect of placement variability on the motion response of total disc replacement under physiologic loads. In Spine Arthroplasty 6: Global Symposium on Motion preservation technology, 2006, pp. 9-10 (Spine Arthroplasty Society, Montreal, Canada).
72. Sharma, M., Langrana, N. A., and Rodriguez, J. Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability. Spine, 1995, 20, 887-900.
73. Wroblewski, B. M. Revision surgery in total hip arthroplasty, 1990, p. 240 (Springer-Verlag, Hamburg).
74. Huddleston, H. D. Femoral lysis after cemented hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty, 1988, 3, 285-297.
75. Willert, H. G., Bertram, H., and Buchhorn, G. H. Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip. The role of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles. Clin. Orthop., 1990, 258, 95-107.
76. Anthony, P. P., Gie, G. A., Howie, C. R., and Ling, R. S. Localised endosteal bone lysis in relation to the femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties. J. Bone Jt Surg. Br., 1990, 72, 971-979.
77. Goldring, S. R., Schiller, A. L., Roelke, M., Rourke, C. M., O'Nell, D. A., and Harris, W. H. The synovial-like membrane at the bone-cement interface in loose total hip replacements and its proposed role in bone lysis. J. Bone Jt Surg. Am., 1983, 65, 575-584.
78. Callaghan, J. J., Pedersen, D. R., Johnston, R. C., and Brown, T. D. Clinical biomechanics of wear in total hip arthroplasty. Iowa Orthop. J., 2003, 23, 1-12.
79. Goodman, S. B., Lind, M., Song, Y., and Smith, R. L. In vitro, in vivo, and tissue retrieval studies on particulate debris. Clin. Orthop., 1998, 352, 25-34.
80. Hirakawa, K., Jacobs, J. J., Urban, R., and Saito, T. Mechanisms of failure of total hip replacements: lessons learned from retrieval studies. Clin. Orthop., 2004, 420, 10-17.
81. Hailey, J. L., Ingham, E., Stone, M., Wroblewski, B. M., and Fisher, J. Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear debris generated in vivo and in laboratory tests; the influence of counterface roughness. Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 1996, 210, 3-10.
82. Green, T. R., Fisher, J., Stone, M., Wroblewski, B. M., and Ingham, E. Polyethylene particles of a 'critical size' are necessary for the induction of cytokines by macrophages in vitro. Biomaterials, 1998, 19, 2297-2302.
83. Dooris, A. P., Ares, P. J., Gabriel, S. M., and Serhan, H. A. Wear characterization of Charité artificial discs. American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2005, (AAOS, Washington DC, USA).
84. Elfick, A. P., Smith, S. L., and Unsworth, A. Variation in the wear rate during the life of a total hip arthroplasty: a simulator and retrieval study. J. Arthroplasty, 2000, 15, 901-908.
85. Hall, R. M., Unsworth, A., Siney, P., and Wroblewski, B. M. Wear in retrieved Charnley acetabular sockets. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 1996, 210, 197-207.
86. David, T. Revision of a Charité artificial disc 9.5 years in vivo to a new Charité artifical disc: case report and explant analysis. Euro Spine J., 2005, 14, 507-511.
87. Archibeck, M. J., Jacobs, J. J., Roebuck, K. A., and Glant, T. T. The basic science of periprosthetic osteolysis. Instr. Course Lect., 2001, 50, 185-195.
88. Bullough, P. G., DiCarlo, E. F., Hansraj, K. K., and Neves, M. C. Pathologic studies of total joint replacement. Orthop. Clin. North Am., 1988, 19, 611-625.
89. Korovessis, P. and Repanti, M. Evolution of aggressive granulomatous periprosthetic lesions in cemented hip arthroplasties. Clin. Orthop., 1994, 300, 155-161.
90. Pizzoferrato, A., Ciapetti, G., Stea, S., and Toni, A. Cellular events in the mechanisms of prosthesis loosening. Clin. Mater., 1991, 7, 51-81.
91. Mirra, J. M., Marder, R. A., and Amstutz, H. C. The pathology of failed total joint arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop., 1982, 170, 175-183.
92. Willert, H. G. and Buchhorn, G. H. Particle disease due to wear of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. Findings from retrieval studies, In Biological, material and mechanical considerations of joint replacement (Ed. B. F. Morrey), 1993, p. 97-102 (Raven Press, New York).
93. Bobyn, J. D., Jacobs, J. J., Tanzer, M., Urban, R. M., Aribindi, R., Sumner, D. R., Turner, T. M., and Brooks, C. E. The susceptibility of smooth implant surfaces to periimplant fibrosis and migration of polyethylene wear debris. Clin. Orthop., 1995, 311, 21-39.
94. Howie, D. W., Haynes, D. R., Rogers, S. D., McGee, M. A., and Pearcy, M. J. The response to particulate debris. Orthop. Clin. North Am., 1993, 24, 571-581.
95. Maloney, W. J., Jasty, M., Harris, W. H., Galante, J. O., and Callaghan, J. J. Endosteal erosion in association with stable uncemented femoral components. J. Bone Jt Surg. Am., 1990, 72, 1025-1034.
96. Schmalzried, T. P., Maloney, W. J., Jasty, M., Kwong, L. M., and Harris, W. H. Autopsy studies of the bone-cement interface in well-fixed cemented total hip arthroplasties. J. Arthroplasty, 1993, 8, 179-188.
97. Schmalzried, T. P., Jasty, M., and Harris, W. H. Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty. Polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. J. Bone Jt Surg. Am., 1992, 74, 849-863.
98. Hirakawa, K., Bauer, T. W., Stulberg, B. N., Wilde, A. H., and Borden, L. S. Characterization of debris adjacent to failed knee implants of 3 different designs. Clin. Orthop., 1996, 331, 151-158.
99. Campbell, P., Ma, S., Yeom, B., McKellop, H., Schmalzried, T. P., Grigoris, P., Amstutz, H. C., and Sarmiento, A. Isolation of predominantly submicron-sized UHMWPE wear particles from periprosthetic tissues. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1995, 29, 127-131.
100. McKellop, H. A., Campbell, P., Park, S. H., Schmalzried, T. P., Grigoris, P., Amstutz, H. C., and Sarmiento, A. The origin of submicron polyethylene wear debris in total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop., 1995, 311, 3-20.
101. Ingham, E. and Fisher, J. Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2000, 214, 21-37.
102. Tipper, J. L., Ingham, E., Hailey, J. L., Besong, A. A., Fisher, J., Wroblewski, B. M., and Stone, M. H. Quantitative analysis of polyethylene wear debris, wear rate and head damage in retireved Charnley hip prostheses. J. Mater: Mater. Med., 2000, 11, 117-124.
103. Revell, P. A., Al-Saffar, N., and Kobayashi, A. Biological reaction to debris in relation to joint prostheses. Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs, Part H: Engineering in Medicine, 1997, 211, 187-197.
104. Heisel C., Silva, M., dela Rosa, M. A., and Schmalzried, T. P. Short-term in vivo wear of cross-linked polyethylene. J. Bone Jt Surg. Am., 2004, 86, 748-751.
105. Doorn, P. F., Campbell, P. A., Worrall, J., Benya, P. D., McKellap, H. A., and Amstutz, H. C. Metal wear particle characterization from metal on metal total hip replacements: transmission electron microscopy study of periprosthetic tissues and isolated particles. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1998, 42, 103-111.
106. Firkins, P. J., Tipper, J. L., Saadatzadeh, M. R., Ingham, E., Stone, M. H., Farrar, R., and Fisher, J. Quantitative analysis of wear and wear debris from metal-on-metal hip prostheses tested in a physiological hip joint simulator. Biomed. Mater. Eng., 2001, 11, 143-157.
107. Germain, M. A., Hatton, A., Williams, S., Matthews, J. B., Stone, M. H., Fisher, J., and Ingham, E. Comparison of the cytotoxicity of clinically relevant cobalt-chromium and alumina ceramic wear particles in vitro. Biomaterials, 2003, 24, 469-479.