The Clinical Performance of UHMWPE in the Spine

The UHMWPE Handbook: Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene in Total Joint Replacement

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 219-243

  Villarraga, Marta L ^a   Cripton, Peter A ^b  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

JOINT PROSTHESES; POLYETHYLENES; ULTRAHIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENES;

CLINICAL PERFORMANCE; DIFFERENT HEIGHTS; LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP; PATIENT'S ANATOMY; POLYMERIC BEARINGS; RETRIEVED IMPLANT; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENTS;

NONMETALLIC MATRIX COMPOSITES;

EID: 18144376321     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-012429851-4/50011-5     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Ahrens J., Shelokov A., Carver J. Normal joint mobilities maintained with an artificial disk. Lecture, International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine (ISSLS), Toronto 1998.
2. Bao Q.B., Yuan H.A. Artificial disc technology. Neurosurg Focus 2000, 9:1-7.
3. Bertagnoli R., Kumar S. Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: A correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J 2002, 11(Suppl 2):S131-S136.
4. Büttner-Janz K., Schellnack K., Zippel H. [An alternative treatment strategy in lumbar intervertebral disk damage using an SB Charité modular type intervertebral disk endoprosthesis]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1987, 125:1-6.
5. Büttner-Janz K., Schellnack K., Zippel H. Biomechanics of the SB Charité lumbar intervertebral disc endoprosthesis. Int Orthop 1989, 13:173-176.
6. The artificial disc 2003, Springer Verlag, Berlin. K. Büttner-Janz, S. Hochschuler, P. McAfee (Eds.).
7. Calisse J., Rohlmann A., Bergmann G. Estimation of trunk muscle forces using the finite element method and in vivo loads measured by telemeterized internal spinal fixation devices. J Biomech 1999, 32:727-731.
8. Cripton P.A., Jain G.M., Wittenberg R.H., Nolte L.P. Load-sharing characteristics of stabilized lumbar spine segments. Spine 2000, 25:170-179.
9. Cripton P.A., Sati M., Orr T.E., et al. Animation of in vitro biomechanical tests. J Biomech 2001, 34:1091-1096.
10. David T. Complications with the SB Charité artificial disc. The artificial disc 2003, Springer Verlag, Berlin. K. Büttner-Janz, S. Hochschuler, P. McAfee (Eds.).
11. Dooris A.P., Goel V.K., Grosland N.M., et al. Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine 2001, 26:E122-E129.
12. Eck J.C., Humphreys S.C., Hodges S.D. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: A review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies. Am J Orthop 1999, 28:336-340.
13. Eijkelkamp M.F., van Donkelaar C.C., Veldhuizen A.G., et al. Requirements for an artificial intervertebral disc. Int J Artif Organs 2001, 24:311-321.
14. Fernstrom U. Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprosthesis in herniated disc and in painful disc. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 1966, 357:154-159.
15. Griffith S.L., Shelokov A.P., Büttner-Janz K., et al. A multicenter retrospective study of the clinical results of the LINK SB Charité intervertebral prosthesis. The initial European experience. Spine 1994, 19:1842-1849.
16. Guyer R.D., Ohnmeiss D.D. Intervertebral disc prostheses. Spine 2003, 28:S15-S23.
17. Hedman T.P., Kostuik J.P., Fernie G.R., Hellier W.G. Design of an intervertebral disc prosthesis. Spine 1991, 16:S256-S260.
18. Hellier W.G., Hedman T.P., Kostuik J.P. Wear studies for development of an intervertebral disc prosthesis. Spine 1992, 17:S86-S96.
19. Hochschuler S.H., Ohnmeiss D.D., Guyer R.D., Blumenthal S.L. Artificial disc: Preliminary results of a prospective study in the United States. Eur Spine J 2002, 11(Suppl 2):S106-S110.
20. Huang R.C., Girardi F.P., Cammisa F.P., Wright T.M. The implications of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement. Spine 2003, 28(Suppl):S412-S417.
21. Kinzel G.L., Hall A.S., Hillberry B.M. Measurement of the total motion between two body segments-I. Analytical development. J Biomech 1972, 5:93-105.
22. Kostuik J.P. Alternatives to spinal fusion. Orthop Clin North Am 1998, 29:701-715.
23. Kumaresan S., Yoganandan N., Pintar F.A., et al. Contribution of disc degeneration to osteophyte formation in the cervical spine: A biomechanical investigation. J Orthop Res 2001, 19:977-984.
24. Langrana N.A., Parsons J.R., Lee C.K., et al. Materials and design concepts for an intervertebral disc spacer. I. Fiber-reinforced composite design. J Appl Biomater 1994, 5:125-132.
25. LeHuec J.C., Kiaer T., Friesem T., et al. Shock absorption in lumbar disc prosthesis: A preliminary mechanical study. Spine 2003, 28:346-351.
26. Lemaire J-P. Mid-term (4 year) and long-term (10 year) results of the SB Charité prosthesis. The artificial disc 2003, Springer Verlag, Berlin. K. Büttner-Janz, S. Hochschuler, P. McAfee (Eds.).
27. Lemaire J.P., Skalli W., Lavaste F., et al. Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop 1997, 337:64-76.
28. Link H.D. History, design and biomechanics of the LINK SB Charité artificial disc. Eur Spine J 2002, 11(Suppl2):S98-S105.
29. Link H.D., Keller A. Biomechanics of total disc replacement. The artificial disc 2003, Springer Verlag, Berlin. K. Büttner-Janz, S. Hochschuler, P. McAfee (Eds.).
30. Link S.B. Is fusion still today's gold standard?. Charité artificial disc, maintaining natural mobility 2001, Waldemar Link, Hamburg.
31. Linovitz R. PRODISC. Retrospective clinical study: 7 to 11 year follow up: Internal Report, Spine Solutions 2001.
32. Lipman J., Campbell D., Girardi F., et al. Mechanical behavior of the PRODISC II intervertebral disc prosthesis in human cadaveric spines. 49th Annual Meeting of the Orthopedic Research Society 2003.
33. Marnay T. Lumbar disc replacement, 7-11 years results with PRODISC. Eur Spine J 2003, 11(Suppl):S19.
34. McAfee P.C., Cunningham B.W., Lee G.A., et al. Revision strategies for salvaging or improving failed cylindrical cages. Spine 1999, 24:2147-2153.
35. McAfee P.C., Fedder I.L., Saiedy S., et al. SB Charité disc replacement: Report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a U.S. center. Spine 2003, 28(Suppl):S424-S433.
36. McGill S.M., Norman R.W. Partitioning of the L4-L5 dynamic moment into disc, ligamentous, and muscular components during lifting. Spine 1986, 11:666-678.
37. McGill S.M. Loads on the lumbar spine and associated tissues. Biomechanics of the spine, clinical and surgical perspective 1990, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. V.K. Goel, J.N. Weinstein (Eds.).
38. Nachemson A.L. Disc pressure measurements. Spine 1981, 6:93-97.
39. Oxland T.R., Panjabi M.M., Lin R.M. Axes of motion of thoracolumbar burst fractures. J Spinal Disorders 1994, 7:130-138.
40. Pointillart V. Cervical disc prosthesis in humans: First failure. Spine 2001, 26:E90-E92.
41. Rohlmann A., Bergmann G., Graichen F. Loads on an internal spinal fixation device during walking. J Biomech 1997, 30:41-47.
42. Rohlmann A., Bergmann G., Graichen F., Neff G. Braces do not reduce loads on internal spinal fixation devices. Clin Biomech 1999, 14:97-102.
43. Rohlmann A., Bergmann G., Graichen F., Mayer H.M. Influence of muscle forces on loads in internal spinal fixation devices. Spine 1998, 23:537-542.
44. Spine Solutions I. PRODISC, company brochure. New York 2002.
45. Spine Solutions I. PRODISC, retrospective clinical study: 7 to 11 year follow-up. New York 2002.
46. Suk K.S., Lee H.M., Moon S.H., Kim N.H. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: Results of operative management. Spine 2001, 26:672-676.
47. Tropiano P., Huang R.C., Girardi F.P., Marnay T. Lumbar disc replacement: Preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. Spine 2003, 28(Suppl):S362-S368.
48. Van Ooij A., Oner F.C., Verbout A.J. Complications of artificial disc replacement: A report of 27 patients with the SB Charité disc. Spine 2003, 28(Suppl):S369-S383.
49. Wen N., Lavaste F., Santin J.J., Lassau J.P. Three-dimensional biomechanical properties of the human cervical spine in vitro, I. Analysis of normal motion. European Spine Journal 1993, 2:2-11.
50. White A.A., Panjabi M.M. Clinical biomechanics of the spine 1990, J.B. Lippincott, New York. 2nd ed.
51. Whitecloud T.S. Modern alternatives and techniques for one-level discectomy and fusion. Clin Orthop 1999, 359:67-76.
52. Wilke H.J., Neef P., Caimi M., et al. New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 1999, 24:755-762.
53. Yorimitsu E., Chiba K., Toyama Y., Hirabayashi K. Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: A follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine 2001, 26:652-657.
54. Zeegers W.S., Bohnen L.M., Laaper M., Verhaegen M.J. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 1999, 8:210-217.
55. Zigler J.E. Early experience with PRODISC in the United States. Spine 2002, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. A.G. Aesculap, K.G. Tuttlingen (Eds.).
56. Zigler J.E., Burd T.A., Vialle E.N., et al. Lumbar spine arthroplasty: Early results using the ProDisc II: A prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. Spine 2003, 28(Suppl):352-361.