Difference variance dispersion graphs for comparing response surface designs with applications in food technology

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 441-455

  Trinca, Luzia A ^a   Gilmour, Steven G ^b  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Blocking; Box Behnken design; Central composite design; D optimal design; Differences in response; Second order model

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033474612     PISSN: 00359254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9876.00164     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Arap Koske, J. K. (1989) The variance function of the difference between two estimated fourth order response surfaces. J. Statist. Planng Inf., 23, 263-266.
2. Atkinson, A. C. (1970) The design of experiments to estimate the slope of a response surface. Biometrika, 57, 319-328.
3. Atkinson, A. C. and Donev, A. N. (1989) The construction of exact D-optimum experimental designs with application to blocking response surface designs. Biometrika, 76, 515-526.
4. -(1992) Optimum Experimental Designs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Box, G. E. P. and Draper, N. R. (1980) The variance function of the difference between two estimated responses. J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 42, 79-82.
6. -(1987) Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces. New York: Wiley.
7. Gilmour, S. G. and Ringrose, T. J. (1999) Controlling processes in food technology by simplifying the canonical form of fitted response surfaces. Appl. Statist., 48, 91-101.
8. Giovannitti-Jensen, A. and Myers, R. H. (1989) Graphical assessment of the prediction capability of response surface designs. Technometrics, 31, 159-171.
9. Herzberg, A. M. (1967) The behaviour of the variance function of the difference between two estimated responses. J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 29, 174-179.
10. Huda, S. (1985) Variance of the difference between two estimated responses. J. Statist. Planng Inf., 11, 89-93.
11. -(1997) Minimax second-order designs over hypercubes for the difference between estimated responses at a point and at the centre. Statist. Probab. Lett., 33, 193-199.
12. Huda, S. and Mukerjee, R. (1984) Minimizing the maximum variance of the difference between two estimated responses. Biometrika, 71, 381-385.
13. Jang, D. H. and Park, S. H. (1993) A measure and a graphical method for evaluating slope rotatability in response surface designs. Communs Statist. Theory Meth., 22, 1849-1863.
14. Khuri, A. I. (1994) Effects of blocking on the estimation of a response surface. J. Appl. Statist., 21, 305-316.
15. Khuri, A. I. and Cornell, J. A. (1996) Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses, 2nd edn. New York: Dekker.
16. Myers, R. H. and Montgomery, D. C. (1995) Response Surface Methodology. New York: Wiley.
17. Park, J.-Y. (1990) Designs for estimating the differences between two responses. Communs Statist. Theory Meth., 19, 4773-4787.
18. SAS Institute (1995) SAS/QC Software: Usage and Reference, Version 6, vol. 1. Cary: SAS Institute.
19. Searle, S. R. (1982) Matrix Algebra Useful for Statistics. New York: Wiley.
20. Smith, N. K., Gilmour, S. G. and Rastall, R. A. (1997) Statistical optimisation of enzymatic synthesis of derivatives of trehalose and sucrose. Enz. Microb. Technol., 21, 349-354.
21. Trinca, L. A. (1996) Blocking response surface designs. PhD Thesis. Department of Applied Statistics, University of Reading, Reading.
22. Trinca, L. A. and Gilmour, S. G. (1998) Variance dispersion graphs for comparing blocked response surface designs. J. Qual. Technol., 30, 314-327.
23. Vining, G. G. (1993) A computer program for generating variance dispersion graphs. J. Qual. Technol., 25, 45-60.