A pilot study examining the longer term stability of the scientist-practitioner model of training

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 830-841

  Horn, Robert A ^a   McGowan, Mark R ^a   Mitchell, Daniel R ^a   Mellott, Ramona N ^a   Lilly, Kristen ^a   Martinez, Lori ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Counseling psychology; School psychology; Scientist Practitioner Inventory; Scientist practitioner

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846066469     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: 15523381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764206297580     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aspenson, D. O., & Gersh, T. L. (1993). Graduate psychology students' perceptions of the scientist-practitioner model of training. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 6, 201-216.
2. Baker, D. B., & Benjamin, L. T. (2000). The affirmation of the scientist-practitioner: A look back at Boulder. American Psychologist, 55, 241-247.
3. Belar, C. D. (2000). Scientist-practitioner ≠ science + practice. American Psychologist, 55, 249-250.
4. Benjamin, L. T., & Baker, D. B. (2000). Boulder at 50: Introduction to section. American Psychologist, 55, 233-236.
5. Borders, L. D., & Bloss, K. K. (1994). Helping students apply the scientist-practitioner model: A teaching approach. Counselor Education and Supervision, 34, 172-177.
6. Carter, J. A. (2002). Integrating science and practice: Reclaiming the science in practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1285-1290.
7. Drabick, D. A. G., & Goldfried, M. R. (2000). Training the scientist-practitioner for the 21st century: Putting the bloom back on the rose. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 327-340.
8. Gelso, C. J. (1993). On the making of a scientist-practitioner: A theory of research training in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 468-476.
9. Holland, J. L. (1977). Vocational Preference Inventory (VPI) Research Form B. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
10. Holland, J. L. (1985). Vocational Preference Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
11. Lampropoulos, G. K., & Spengler, P. M. (2002). Introduction: Reprioritizing the role of science in a realistic version of the scientist-practitioner model. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1195-1197.
12. Leong, F. T. L., & Zachar, P. (1991). Development and validation of the scientist-practitioner inventory for psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 331-341.
13. Soldz, S., & McCullough, L. (Eds.). (2000). Reconciling empirical knowledge and clinical experience: The art and science of psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14. Stoltenberg, C. D., Pace, T. M., Kashubeck-West, S., Biever, J. L., Patterson, T., & Welch, I. D. (2000). Training models in counseling psychology: Scientist-practitioner versus practitioner-scholar. The Counseling Psychologist, 28, 622-640.
15. Stricker, G. (2000). The scientist-practitioner model: Gandhi was right again. American Psychologist, 55, 253-254.
16. Stricker, G. (2002). What is a scientist-practitioner anyway? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1277-1283.
17. Survey Monkey. (2004). Software for professional surveys [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.surveymonkey.com
18. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
19. Zachar, P., & Leong, F. T. L. (2000). A 10-year longitudinal study of scientist-practitioner interests in psychology: Assessing the Boulder model. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 575-580.