Scientist-practitioner ≠ science + practice: Boulder is bolder

American Psychologist

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 249-250

  Belar, Cynthia D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CERTIFICATION; CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY; EDUCATION; HISTORY; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; STANDARD; UNITED STATES; VOCATIONAL EDUCATION;

CERTIFICATION; COLORADO; CONGRESSES; EDUCATION, PROFESSIONAL; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034133403     PISSN: 0003066X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.248     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Belar, C. D., & Perry, N. W. (1992). National Conference on Scientist-Practitioner Education and Training for the Professional Practice of Psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 71-75.
2. Council of University Directors of Clinical Psychology. (1996). Survey of clinical psychology doctoral programs. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Davison, G. C., & Lazarus, A. A. (1995). The dialectics of science and practice. In S. C. Hayes, V. M. Follette, R. M. Dawes, & K. E. Grady (Eds.), Scientific standards of psychological practice (pp. 95-120). Reno, NV: Context Press.
4. Peterson, R. L., Peterson, D. R., Abrams, J. C., & Stricker, G. (1997). The National Council of Schools and Programs of Professional Psychology educational model. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 373-386.
5. Raimy, V. C. (1950). Training in clinical psychology. New York: Prentice Hall.