Simple methods for assessing haplotype-environment interactions in case-only and case-control studies

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 75-90

  Kwee, L C ^a   Epstein, M P ^b   Manatunga, A K ^a   Duncan, R ^b   Allen, A S ^c   Satten, G A ^d  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SIMULATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC MODEL; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HAPLOTYPE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, GENETIC; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HAPLOTYPES; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 33845933043     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: 10982272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20192     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Akaike H. 1985. Prediction and entropy. In: A celebration of statistics. Atkinson AC, Feinberg SE, editors. New York: Springer, p 1-24.
2. Akey J, Jin L, Xiong M. 2001. Haplotypes vs Single-marker linkage disequilibrium tests: what do we gain? Eur J Hum Genet 9:291-300.
3. Allen AS, Satten GA, Tsiatis AA. 2005. Locally-efficient robust estimation of haplotype-disease association in family-based studies. Biometrika 92:559-571.
4. Carroll RJ, Wang S, Wang CY. 1995. Prospective analysis of logistic case-control studies. J Am Stat Assoc 90:157-169.
5. Chapman JM, Cooper JD, Todd JA, Clayton DG. 2003. Detecting disease associations due to linkage disequilibrium using haplotype tags: a class of tests and the determinants of statistical power. Hum Hered 56:18-31.
6. Durrant C, Zondervan KT, Cardon LR, Hunt S, Deloukas P, Morris AP. 2004. Linkage disequilibrium mapping via cladistic analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes. Am J Hum Genet 75:35-43.
7. Epstein MP, Satten GA. 2003. Inference on haplotype effects in case-control studies using unphased genotype data. Am J Hum Genet 73:1316-1329.
8. Excoffier L, Slatkin M. 1995. Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population. Mol Biol Evol 12:921-927.
9. Fallin D, Cohen A, Essioux L, Chumakov I, Blumenfeld M, Cohen D, Schork N. 2001. Genetic analysis of case/control data using estimated haplotype frequencies: application to APOE variation and Alzheimer's disease. Genome Res 11:143-151.
10. Gail MH, Lubin JH, Rubinstein LV. 1981. Likelihood calculations for matched case-control studies and survival studies with tied death times. Biometrika 68:703-707.
11. Greenland S, Thomas DC. 1982. On the need for the rare-disease assumption in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 116:547-553.
12. Howard S. 1972. Discussion of "Regression Models and Life Tables." J R Stat Soc B 34:210-211.
13. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H. 1982. Epidemiologic research: principles and Quantitative Methods. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications.
14. Kraft P, Cox DG, Paynter RA, Hunter D, De Vivo I. 2005. Accounting for haplotype uncertainty in matched association studies: a comparison of simple and flexible techniques. Genet Epidemiol 28:261-272.
15. Lake SL, Lyon H, Tantisira K, Silverman EK, Weiss ST, Laird NM, Schaid DJ. 2003. Estimation and tests of haplotype-environment interaction when linkage phase is ambiguous. Hum Hered 55:56-65.
16. Lin DY, Zeng D. 2006. Likelihood-based inference on haplotype effects in genetic association studies. J Am Stat Assoc 101:89-104.
17. Lin DY, Zeng D, Millikan R. 2005. Maximum-likelihood estimation of haplotype effects and haplotype-environment interactions in association studies. Genet Epidemiol 29:299-312.
18. McLachlan GJ, Krishnan T. 1997. The EM algorithm and extensions. New York: Wiley.
19. Morris RW, Kaplan NL. 2002. On the advantage of haplotype analysis in the presence of multiple disease susceptibility alleles. Genet Epidemiol 23:221-233.
20. Olson JM, Wijsman EM. 1994. Design and sample-size considerations in the detection of linkage disequilibrium with a disease locus. Am J Hum Genet 55:574-580.
21. Piegorsch WW, Weinberg CR, Taylor JA. 1994. Non-hierarchical logistic models and case-only designs for assessing susceptibility in population-based case-control studies. Stat Med 13:153-162.
22. Prentice RL, Fyke R. 1979. Logistic disease incidence models and case-control studies. Biometrika 66:403-412.
23. Rosenberg PS, Che A, Chen BE. 2006. Multiple hypothesis testing strategies for genetic case-control association studies. Stat Med 25:3134-3149.
24. Satten GA, Epstein MP. 2004. Comparison of prospective and retrospective methods for haplotype inference in case-control studies. Genet Epidemiol 27:192-201.
25. Spinka C, Carroll RJ, Chatterjee N. 2005. Analysis of case-control studies of genetic and environmental factors with missing genetic information and haplotype-phase ambiguity. Genet Epidemiol 29:108-127.
26. Tavtigian S, Simard J, Teng D, Abtin V, Baumgard M, Beck A, Camp J, et al. 2001. A candidate prostate cancer susceptibility gene at chromosome 17p. Nat Genet 27:172-180.
27. Tuomilehto J, Korhonen HJ, Kartovaara L, Salomaa V, Stengard JH, Pitkanen M, Aro A, Javela K, Uusitupa M, Pitkaniemi J. 1991. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in the middle-aged population of three areas in Finland. Int J Epidemiol 20:1010-1017.
28. Tzeng JY, Roeder K. Comment on 'Likelihood-based inference on haplotype effects in genetic association studies 2006. J Am Stat Assoc 101:111-114.
29. Tzeng JY, Wang CH, Kao JT, Hsiao CK. 2006. Regression-based association analysis with clustered haplotypes through use of genotypes. Am J Hum Genet 78:231-242.
30. Valle T, Tuomilehto J, Bergman RN, Ghosh S, Hauser ER, Eriksson J, Nylund SJ, Kohtamaki K, Toivanen L, Vidgren G, Tuomilehto-Wolf E, Ehnholm C, Blaschak J, Langefeld CD, Watanabe RM, Magnuson V, Ally DS, Hagopian WA, Ross E, Buchanan TA, Collins F, Boehnke M. 1998. Mapping genes for NIDDM: design of the Finland-United States Investigation of NIDDM Genetics (FUSION) study. Diab Care 21:949-958.
31. Yang Q, Khoury MJ, Flanders WD. 1997. Sample size requirements in case-only designs to detect gene-environment interaction. Am J Epidemiol 146:713-720.