Numerical model study of flow dynamics through an end-to-side anastomosis: Choice of anastomosis angle and prosthesis diameter

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 773-779

  Pousset, Yves ^a   Lermusiaux, Patrick ^b   Berton, Gaëlle ^a   Le Gouez, Jean Marie ^c   Leroy, René ^a  

^a Mechanics and Rheology Laboratory   (France)

^b SERVICE DE DERMATOLOGIE   (France)

^c Synapse Development   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS; BLOOD FLOW; CONFERENCE PAPER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; PULSATILE FLOW; SHEAR STRESS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 33845864963     PISSN: 08905096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10016-006-9125-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Fichelle JM, Marzelle J, Colacchio G, et al. Infrapopliteal polytetrafluoroethylene and composite bypass: factors influencing patency. Ann Vasc Surg 1995; 9:187-196
2. Sottiurai VS, Yao JS, Batson RC, et al. Distal anastomotic intimal hyperplasia: histopathologic character and biogenesis. Ann Vasc Surg 1989; 3:26-33
3. Bassiouny HS, White S, Glagov S, et al. Anastomotic intimal hyperplasia: mechanical injury or flow induced. J Vasc Surg 1992; 15:708-716
4. LoGerfo FW, Quist WC, Nowak MD, et al. Downstream anastomotic hyperplasia: a mechanism of failure in Dacron arterial grafts. Ann Surg 1983; 197:479-483
5. Lemson MS, Tordoir JH, Daemen MJ, Kitslaar PJ. Intimal hyperplasia in vascular grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 19:336-350
6. Davies PF. Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. Physiol Rev 1995; 75:519-560
7. Ojha M, Cobbold RS, Johnston KW. Influence of angle on wall shear stress distribution for an end-to-side anastomosis. J Vasc Surg 1994; 19:1067-1073
8. Lei M, Archie JP, Kleinstreuer C. Computational design of a bypass graft that minimizes wall shear stress gradients in the region of the distal anastomosis. J Vasc Surg 1997; 25:637-646
9. Tardy Y, Resnick N, Nagel T, et al. Shear stress gradients remodel endothelial monolayers in vitro via a cell proliferation-migration-loss cycle. Arterioscler. Thromb Vasc Biol 1997; 17:3102-3106
10. White CR, Haidekker M, Bao X, Frangos JA. Temporal gradients in shear, but not spatial gradients, stimulate endothelial cell proliferation. Circulation 2001; 103:2508-2513
11. Crawshaw HM, Quist WC, Serallach E, et al. Flow disturbance at the distal end-to-side anastomosis: effect of patency of the proximal outflow segment and angle of anastomosis. Arch Surg 1980; 115:1280-1284
12. Ojha M. Spatial and temporal variations of wall shear stress within an end-to-side arterial anastomosis model. J Biomech 1993; 26:1377-1388
13. Rittgers SE, Bhambhani GH. Doppler color flow images of iliofemoral graft end-to-side distal anastomotic models. Ultrasound Med Biol 1993; 19:257-267
14. White SS, Zarins CK, Giddens DP, et al. Hemodynamic patterns in two models of end-to-side vascular graft anastomoses: effects of pulsatility, flow division, Reynolds number, and hood length. J Biomech Eng 1993; 115:104-111
15. Henry FS, Collins MW, Hughes PE, How TV. Numerical investigation of steady flow in proximal and distal end-to-side anastomoses. J Biomech Eng 1996; 118:302-310
16. Hughes PE, How TV. Effects of geometry and flow division on flow structures in models of the distal end-to-side anastomosis. J Biomech 1996; 29:855-872
17. How TV, Rowe CS, Gilling-Smith GL, Harris PL. Interposition vein cuff anastomosis alters wall shear stress distribution in the recipient artery. J Vasc Surg 2000; 31:1008-1017
18. Li XM, Rittgers SE. Hemodynamic factors at the distal end-to-side anastomosis of a bypass graft with different POS:DOS flow ratios. J Biomech Eng 2001; 123:270-276
19. Sauvage LR, Walker MW, Berger K, et al. Current arterial prostheses: experimental evaluation by implantation in the carotid and circumflex coronary arteries of the dog. Arch Surg 1979; 114:687-691
20. Heise M, Kruger U, Ruckert R, et al. Correlation of intimal hyperplasia development and shear stress distribution at the distal end-side-anastomosis, in vitro study using particle image velocimetry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003; 26:357-366
21. Dean RH, Yao JS, Stanton PE, Bergan JJ. Prognostic indicators in femoropopliteal reconstructions. Arch Surg 1975; 110:1287-1293
22. Staalsen NH, Ulrich M, Winther J, et al. The anastomosis angle does change the flow fields at vascular end-to-side anastomoses in vivo. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21:460-471
23. Setty SP, Salles-Cunha S, Scissons R, et al. Noninvasive measurement of shear rate in autologous and prosthetic bypass grafts. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2002; 36:447-455
24. Dutta A, Tarbell JM. Influence of non-Newtonian behavior of blood on flow in an elastic artery model. J Biomech Eng 1996; 118:111-119
25. Fei DY, Thomas JD, Rittgers SE. The effect of angle and flow rate upon hemodynamics in distal vascular graft anastomoses: a numerical model study. J Biomech Eng 1994; 116:331-336
26. Ethier CR, Steinman DA, Zhang X, et al. Flow waveform effects on end-to-side anastomotic flow patterns. J Biomech 1998; 31:609-617
27. Lei M, Giddens DP, Jones SA, et al. Pulsatile flow in an end-to-side vascular graft model: comparison of computations with experimental data. J Biomech Eng 2001; 123:80-87
28. Deplano V, Siouffi M. Experimental and numerical study of pulsatile flows through stenosis: wall shear stress analysis. J Biomech 1999; 32:1081-1090
29. Hofer M, Rappitsch G, Perktold K, et al. Numerical study of wall mechanics and fluid dynamics in end-to-side anastomoses and correlation to intimal hyperplasia. J Biomech 1996; 29:1297-1308
30. Fisher RK, How TV, Bakran A, et al. Outflow distribution at the distal anastomosis of infrainguinal bypass grafts. J Biomech 2004; 37:417-420
31. Chang BB, Leather RP, Kaufman JL, et al. Hemodynamic characteristics of failing infrainguinal in situ vein bypass. J Vasc Surg 1990; 12:596-600
32. Abbott WM, Green RM, Matsumoto T, et al. Prosthetic above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: results of a multi-center randomized prospective trial. J Vasc Surg 1997; 25:19-28