Correlation of intimal hyperplasia development and shear stress distribution at the distal end-side-anastomosis, in vitro study using particle image velocimetry

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 357-366

  Heise, M ^a   Kruger U ^b   Ruckert R ^a   Pfitzman, R ^a   Neuhaus, P ^a   Settmacher, U ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b MARTIN LUTHER KRANKENHAUS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SILASTIC;

ARTERY BYPASS; ARTERY INTIMA PROLIFERATION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD FLOWMETRY; CALCULATION; CIRCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE COURSE; END TO SIDE ANASTOMOSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; IN VITRO STUDY; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SHEAR STRESS; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 0142091647     PISSN: 10785884     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1078-5884(02)00567-1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Lemson MS, Tordoir JH, Daemen MJ, Kitslaar PJ. Intimal hyperplasia in vascular grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 19: 336-350.
2. Bassiouny HS, White S, Glagov S, Choi E, Giodens DP, Zarins CK. Anastomotic intimal hyperplasia: mechanical injury or flow induced. J Vasc Surg 1992; 15: 708-716.
3. Sottiurai VS, Yao JS, Flinn WR, Batson RC. Intimal hyperplasia and neointima: An ultrastructural analysis of thrombosed grafts in humans. Surgery 1983; 93: 809-817.
4. Trubel W, Schima H, Moritz A et al. Compliance mismatch and formation of distal anastomotic intimal hyperplasia in externally stiffened and lumen-adapted venous grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1995; 10: 415-423.
5. Abbott WM, Megerman J, Hasson JE, L'Italien G, Warnock DF. Effect of compliance mismatch on vascular graft patency. J Vasc Surg 1987; 5: 376-382.
6. Ballyk PD, Walsh C, Butany J, Ojha M. Compliance mismatch may promote graft-artery intimal hyperplasia by altering suture-line stresses. J Biomech 1998; 31: 229-237.
7. Clowes AW, Clowes MM, Fingerle J, Reidy MA. Regulation of smooth muscle cell growth in injured artery. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1989; 14(Suppl 6): S12-S15.
8. Morinaga K, Okadome K, Kuroki M, Miyazaki T, Muto Y, Inokuchi K. Effect of wall shear stress on intimal thickening of arterially transplanted autogenous veins in dogs. J Vasc Surg 1985; 2: 430-433.
9. Gnasso A, Carallo C, Irace C et al. Association between intima-media thickness and wall shear stress in common carotid arteries in healthy male subjects. Circulation 1996; 94: 3257-3262.
10. Meyerson SL, Skelly CL, Curi MA et al. The effects of extremely low shear stress on cellular proliferation and neointimal thickening in the failing bypass graft. J Vasc Surg 2001; 34: 90 -97.
11. Kohler TR, Kirkman TR, Kraiss LW, Zierler BK, Clowes AW. Increased blood flow inhibits neointimal hyperplasia in endothelialized vascular grafts. Circ Res 1991; 69: 1557-1565.
12. Ojha M, Cobbold RS, Johnston KW. Hemodynamics of a side-to-end proximal arterial anastomosis model. J Vasc Surg 1993; 17: 646-655.
13. Ojha M, Ethier CR, Johnston KW, Cobbold RS. Steady and pulsatile flow fields in an end-to-side arterial anastomosis model. J Vasc Surg 1990; 12: 747-753.
14. Noori N, Scherer R, Perktold K et al. Blood flow in distal end-to-side anastomoses with PTFE and a venous patch: results of an in vitro flow visualisation study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999; 18: 191-200.
15. Rowe CS, Carpenter TK, How TV, Harris PL. Local haemodynamics of arterial bypass graft anastomoses. Proc Inst Mech Eng 1999; 213: 401-409.
16. Ojha M. Wall shear stress temporal gradient and anastomotic intimal hyperplasia. Circ Res 1994; 74: 1227-1231.
17. Lei M, Archie JP, Kleinstreuer C. Computational design of a bypass graft that minimizes wall shear stress gradients in the region of the distal anastomosis. J Vasc Surg 1997; 25: 637-646.
18. Ling SC, Atabek HB, Letzing WG, Patel DJ. Nonlinear analysis of aortic flow in living dogs. Circ Res 1973; 33: 198-212.
19. Lou Z, Yang WJ, Stein PD. Errors in the estimation of arterial wall shear rates that result from curve fitting of velocity profiles. J Biomech 1993; 26: 383-390.
20. Ojha M. Spatial and temporal variations of wall shear stress within an end-to-side arterial anastomosis model. J Biomech 1993; 26: 1377-1388.
21. Bates CJ, O'Doherty DM, Williams D. Flow instabilities in a graft anastomosis: a study of the instantaneous velocity fields. Proc Inst Mech Eng 2001; 215: 579-587.
22. Raffel M, Willert C, Kompenhans J. Particle Image Velocimetry. Berlin: Springer, 1998.
23. Krüger U. Hämodynamische Optimierung von Gefäßprothesen. Berlin: Verlag Dr Köster, 1998.
24. Heise M, Kruger U, Settmacher U, Sklenar S, Neuhaus P, Scholz H. A new method of intraoperative hydraulic impedance measurement provides valuable prognostic information about infrainguinal graft patency. J Vasc Surg 1999; 30: 301-308.
25. Klanchar M, Tarbell JM, Wang DM. In vitro study of the influence of radial wall motion on wall shear stress in an elastic tube model of the aorta. Circ Res 1990; 66: 1624-1635.
26. Smits AJ. A Physical Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. New York: Wiley, 1999.
27. Ojha M, Leask RL, Johnston KW, David TE, Butany J. Histology and morphology of 59 internal thoracic artery grafts and their distal anastomoses. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 1338-1344.
28. Imparato AM, Bracco A, Kim GE, Zeff R. Intimal and neointimal fibrous proliferation causing failure of arterial reconstructions. Surgery 1972; 72: 1007-1017.
29. Dobrin PB, Littooy FN, Endean ED. Mechanical factors predisposing to intimal hyperplasia and medial thickening in autogenous vein grafts. Surgery 1989; 105: 393-400.
30. Greenwald SE, Berry CL. Improving vascular grafts: the importance of mechanical and haemodynamic properties. J Pathol 2000; 190: 292-299.
31. Keynton RS, Evancho MM, Sims RL, Rittgers SE. The effect of graft caliber upon wall shear within in vivo distal vascular anastomoses. J Biomech Eng 1999; 121: 79-88.
32. Ling SC, Atabek HB, Fry DL, Patel DJ, Janicki JS. Application of heated-film velocity and shear probes to hemodynamic studies. Circ Res 1968; 23: 789-801.
33. Deters CJ, Bargeron CB, Mark FF, Friedman MH. Measurement of wall motion and wall shear in a compliant arterial cast. J Biomech Eng 1986; 108: 355-358.
34. Friedman MH, Deters OJ. Correlation among shear rate measures in vascular flows. J Biomech Eng 1987; 109: 25-26.
35. Binns RL, Ku DN, Stewart MT, Ansley JP, Coyle KA. Optimal graft diameter: effect of wall shear stress on vascular healing. J Vasc Surg 1989; 10: 326-337.
36. Zarins CK, Zatina MA, Giddens DP, Ku DN, Glagov S. Shear stress regulation of artery lumen diameter in experimental atherogenesis. J Vasc Surg 1987; 5: 413-420.
37. Fillinger MF, Reinitz ER, Schwartz RA et al. Graft geometry and venous intimal-medial hyperplasia in arteriovenous loop grafts. J Vasc Surg 1990; 11: 556-566.
38. Berguer R, Higgins RF, Reddy DJ. Intimal hyperplasia. An experimental study. Arch Surg 1980; 115: 332-335.
39. Traub O, Berk BC. Laminar shear stress: mechanisms by which endothelial cells transduce an atheroprotective force. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1998; 18: 677-685.
40. Gibbons GH, Dzau VJ. The emerging concept of vascular remodeling. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1431-1438.
41. Kamiya A, Togawa T. Adaptive regulation of wall shear stress to flow change in the canine carotid artery. Am J Physiol 1980; 239: H14-H21.
42. Davies PF. Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. Physiol Rev 1995; 75: 519-560.
43. Fisher AB, Al Mehdi AB, Manevich Y. Shear stress and endothelial cell activation. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: S192-S197.
44. Suggs WD, Henriques HF, Depalma RG. Vein cuff interposition prevents juxta-anastomotic neointimal hyperplasia. Ann Surg 1988; 207: 717-723.
45. Jackson ZS, Ishibashi H, Gotlieb AI, Langille BL. Effects of anastomotic angle on vascular tissue responses at end-to-side arterial grafts. J Vasc Surg 2001; 34: 300-307.
46. Zwolak RM, Adams MC, Clowes AW. Kinetics of vein graft hyperplasia: association with tangential stress. J Vasc Surg 1987; 5: 126-136.