The stability of genetic variance-covariance matrix in the presence of selection

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 28-29

  Kotiaho, J S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NOTE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EVOLUTION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION (GENETICS); VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 33845697286     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01229.x     Document Type: Note

References (13)

1. Blows, M.W. 2007. A tale of two matrices: multivariate approaches in evolutionary biology. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 1-8.
2. Blows, M.W., Chenoweth, S.F. & Hine, E. 2004. Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually-selected traits. Am. Nat. 163: 329-340.
3. Hine, E., Chenoweth, S.F. & Blows, M.W. 2004. Multivariate quantitative genetics and the lek paradox: genetic variance in male sexually-selected traits of Drosophila serrata under field conditions. Evolution 58: 2754-2762.
4. Houle, D., Mezey, J. & Galpern, P. 2002. Interpretation of the results of common principal components analyses. Evolution 56: 433-440.
5. Jones, A.D., Arnold, S.J. & Bürger, R. 2003. Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift. Evolution 57: 1747-1760.
6. Jones, A.D., Arnold, S.J. & Bürger, R. 2004. Evolution and stability of the G-matrix on a landscape with a moving optimum. Evolution 58: 1639-1654.
7. Kotiaho, J.S., Simmons, L.W. & Tomkins, J.L. 2001. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410: 684-686.
8. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33: 402-416.
9. Mezey, J.G. & Houle, D. 2003. Comparing G matrices: are common principal components informative? Genetics 165: 411-425.
10. Pomiankowski, A. & Møller, A.P. 1995. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260: 21-29.
11. Rowe, L. & Houle, D. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 1415-1421.
12. Steppan, S.J., Phillips, P.C. & Houle, D. 2002. Comparative quantitative genetics: evolution of the G matrix. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 320-327.
13. Tomkins, J.L., Radwan, J., Kotiaho, J.S. & Tregenza, T. 2004. Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 323-328.