Diaphragm acceptability among young women at risk for HIV

Women and Health

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 21-39

  Thorburn, Sheryl ^a   Harvey, Marie S ^a   Tipton, Jeffrey ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acceptability; Diaphragm; HIV prevention; Women

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH CONTROL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INFECTION PREVENTION; INFECTION RISK; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOTIVATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVIX CAP;

ADULT; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES, FEMALE; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 33845683529     PISSN: 03630242     EISSN: 15410331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J013v44n01_02     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allen, R. E. (2004). Diaphragm fitting. American Family Physician, 69, 97-100.
2. Anderson, D. (2002, September). The cervix: The achilles heel of the female reproductive tract: HIV immunology. Paper presented at the Diaphragm Rennaisance: The Role of Cervical Barriers, Seattle, Washington.
3. Beckman, L. J., Harvey, S. M., & Murray, J. (1992). Dimensions of the multidimensional contraceptive attributes questionnaire (CAQ). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 243-259.
4. Bird, S. T., Harvey, S. M., Maher, J. E., & Beckman, L. J. (2004). Acceptability of an existing, female-controlled contraceptive method that could potentially protect against HIV: A comparison of diaphragm users and other method users. Women's Health Issues, 14, 85-93.
5. Brafford, L. J., & Beck, K. H. (1991). Development and validation of a condom self-efficacy scale for college students. Journal of American College Health, 39, 219-225.
6. Bulut, A., Ortayli, N., Ringheim, K., Cottingham, J., Farley, T. M., & Peregoudov, A. (2001). Assessing the acceptability, service delivery requirements, and use-effectiveness of the diaphragm in Colombia, Philippines, and Turkey. Contraception, 63, 267-275.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1997). CDC Surveillance Summaries, November 14, 1997. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 46 (No. SS-6).
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2002). HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 14, 1-48.
9. Cohen, C. R. (2002, May). The diaphragm: A female controlled method to prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted infections? Paper presented at Microbicides, Antwerp, Belgium.
10. Diaphragm Renaissance: The Role of Cervical Barriers. (2002, September). Meeting Sponsored by Ibis Reproductive Health, University of California at San Francisco and Program for Appropriate Technology in Health, Seattle, WA.
11. Di Giacomo do Lago, T., Barbosa, R. M., Kalckmann, S., Villela, W. V. & Cohiman, S. (1995). Acceptability of the diaphragm among low-income women in Sao Paulo, Brazil. International Family Planning Perspectives, 21, 114-118.
12. Ellertson, C., & Burns, M. (2003, February). Re-examining the role of cervical barrier devices. OUTLOOK, 20(2), 1-8.
13. Hammer, J. C., Fisher, J. D., Fitzergald, P., & Fisher, W. A. (1996). When two heads aren't better than one: AIDS risk behavior in college-age couples. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 375-397.
14. Harvey, S. M., Beckman, L. J., & Doty, M. (1999). Couple dynamics in sexual and reproductive decision-making among Mexican immigrants. In L. Severy, & W. Miller (Eds.), Advances in Population: Psychosocial Perspectives, Vol 3 (pp. 251-279). London: Jessica Kingsley.
15. Harvey, S. M., Bird, S. T., Galavotti, C., Duncan, & Greenberg, D. (2002). Relationship power, sexual decision making and condom use among women at risk for HIV/STDs. Women & Health, 36(4), 69-84.
16. Harvey, S. M., Bird, S. T., Maher, J. E., & Beckman, L. J. (2003). Who continues using the diaphragm and who doesn't: Implications for the acceptability of female-controlled HIV prevention methods. Women's Health Issues, 13, 85-193.
17. Kline, A., Kline, E., & Oken, E. (1992). Minority women and sexual choice in the age of AIDS. Social Science & Medicine, 34, 447-457.
18. Levy, J. (2002, September). Keynote address: Overview of science. Paper presented at the Diaphragm Rennaisance: The Role of Cervical Barriers, Seattle, Washington.
19. Maher, J. E., Harvey, S. M., Bird, S. T., Stevens, V. J., & Beckman, L. J. (2004). Acceptability of the vaginal diaphragm among current users. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36, 64-71.
20. Mantell, J. E., Hoffman, S., Exner, T. M., Stein, Z. A., & Atkins, K. (2003). Family planning providers' perspectives on dual protection. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35, 71-78.
21. Maxwell, C., & Boyle, M. (1995). Risky heterosexual practices amongst women over 30: Gender, power, and long term relationships. AIDS Care, 7, 277-293.
22. McQuiston, D., & Gordon, A. (2000). The timing is never right: Mexican views of condom use. Health Care for Women International, 21, 277-290.
23. Minnis, A. M., & Padian, N. S. (2005). Effectiveness of female controlled barrier methods in preventing sexually transmitted infections and HIV: Current evidence and future research directions. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 81, 193-200.
24. Minnis, A. M., Shiboski, S. C., & Padian, N. S. (2003). Barrier contraceptive method acceptability and choice are not reliable indicators of use. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 30, 556-561.
25. Misovich, S. J., Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1997). Close relationships and elevated HIV risk behavior: Evidence and possible underlying psychological processes. Review of General Psychology, 1, 72-107.
26. Moench, T. R., Chipato, R., & Padian, N. S. (2001). Preventing disease by protecting the cervix: The unexplored promise of internal vaginal barrier devices. AIDS, 15, 1595-1602.
27. Mosher, W. D., Martinez, G. M., Chandra, A., Abma, J. C., & Willson, S. J. (2004). Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982-2002. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, no. 350, 1-36.
28. O'Donnell, L., San Doval, A., Vornfett, R., & DeJong, W. (1994). Reducing AIDS and other STDs among inner-city Hispanics: The use of qualitative research in the development of video-based patient education. AIDS Education & Prevention, 6, 140-153.
29. Ortayli, N., Bulut, A., Nalbant, H., & Cottingham, J. (2000). Is the diaphragm a viable option for women in Turkey? International Family Planning Perspectives, 26, 36-42.
30. Pulerwitz, J., Gortmaker, S. L., & DeJong, W. (2000). Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research. Sex Roles, 42, 637-660.
31. Ravindran, T. K. S., & Rao, S. S. (1997). Is the diaphragm a suitable method of contraception for low-income women: A user perspectives study, Madras, India. In K. S. Ravindran, M. Berer, and J. Cottingham (Eds.), Beyond acceptability: Users' perspectives on contraception (pp. 78-88). London: Reproductive Health Matters.
32. Severy, L. J., & Newcomer, S. (2005). Critical issues in contraceptive and STI acceptability research. Social Issues, 61, 45-65.
33. Stone, K. M., Timyan, J., & Thomas, E. L. (1999). Barrier methods for the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. In K. K. Holmes, P. Mardh, P. F. Sparling, S. T. Lemon, W. E. Stamm, P Piot et al. (Eds.) Sexually transmitted diseases (pp. 1307-1321). New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. Trussell, J., Strickler, J., & Vaughan, B. (1993). Contraceptive efficacy of the diaphragm, the sponge and the cervical cap. Family Planning Perspectives, 25, 100-105.
35. Trussell, J., & Vaughan, B. (1999). Contraceptive failure, method-related discontinuation and resumption of use: Results from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 64-72.
36. van der Straten, A., Kang, M. S., Posner, S., Kambia, M., Chipato, T., & Padian, N.S. (2005). Predictors of diaphragm use as a potential sexually transmitted disease/HIV prevention method in Zimbabwe. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 32, 64-71.
37. Wingood, G. M., Hunter-Gamble, D., & DiClemente, R. J. (1993). A pilot study of sexual communication and negotiation among young African American women: Implications for HIV prevention. Journal of Black Psychology, 19, 190-203.