Critical issues in contraceptive and STI acceptability research

Journal of Social Issues

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 45-65

  Severy, Lawrence J ^a   Newcomer, Susan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONDOM USE; CONTRACEPTIVE USE; FAMILY PLANNING; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE;

EID: 15844407661     PISSN: 00224537     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-4537.2005.00393.x     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Albarracin, D., Ho, R., McNatt, P., Williams, W., Rhodes, F., Malotte, C. K., et al. (2001). The structure of outcome beliefs in condom use. Health Psychology, 19, 458-468.
2. Alvarado, G., Steiner, M., Spruyt, A., Joanis, C., & Glover, L. (1993). Contraceptive film acceptability study: Mexico. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International.
3. Amato, H. (1995). Love, sex and power: Considering women's realities in HIV prevention. American Psychologist, 50, 437-447.
4. Artz, L., Demand, M., Pulley, L. V., Posner, S. F., & Macaluso, M. (2002). Predictors of difficulty inserting the female condom. Contraception, 65, 151-157.
5. Becker, S. (1996). Couples and reproductive health: A review of couple studies. Studies in Family Planning, 27, 291-306.
6. Bonnar, J., Flynn, A., Freundl, G., Kirkman, R., Royston, R., & Snowden, R. (1999). Personal hormone monitoring for contraception. The British Journal of Family Planning, 24, 128-134.
7. Boonstra, H. (2000, February). Campaign to accelerate microbicide development for STD prevention gets under way. The Guttmacher Report on Public Policy, 3(1), 3-4, 14.
8. Brady, M. (2003). Preventing sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancy, and safeguarding fertility: Triple protection needs of young women. Reproductive Health Matters, 11, 134-141.
9. Burns, L. H. (2003). Cross-cultural issues and the use of assisted reproductive technologies. Unpublished paper. University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.
10. Castle, S., Konate, M. K., Ulin, P. R., & Martin, S. (1999). Clandestine contraceptive use in urban Mali. Studies in Family Planning, 30, 231-248.
11. Catania, J., Kegeles, S., & Coates, T. (1990). Towards an understanding of risk behavior: An AIDS risk reduction model (ARRM). Health Education Quarterly, 17, 53-72.
12. Cleland, J., Hardy, E., & Taucher, E. (1990). Introduction of new contraceptives into family planning programmes: Guidelines for social science research. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
13. Contraceptive ring, patch approved. (2002). Network21(2), 27.
14. Cordero, M., Steiner, M., Spruyt, A., Joanis, C., & Glover, L. (1993). Contraceptive film acceptability study: Dominican Republic. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International.
15. Darroch, J. E., & Frost, J. J. (1999). Women's interest in vaginal microbicides. Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 16-23.
16. Davidson, A. R., & Jaccard, J. J. (1979). Variables that moderate the attitude behavior relation: Results of a longitudinal survey. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 364-376.
17. Davidson, A. R., & Morrison, D. M. (1983). Predicting contraceptive behavior from attitudes: A comparison of within- versus across-subjects procedures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 997-1009.
18. Elias, C., & Coggins, C. (1996). Female-controlled methods to prevent sexual transmission of HIV. AIDS, 10, S43-S51.
19. Elias, C., & Coggins, C. (2001). Acceptability research on female-controlled barrier methods to prevent heterosexual transmission of HIV: Where have we been? Where are we going? Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine, 10, 163-173.
20. Ellertson, C., Elias, C., & Coggins, C. (1999, October). Current research on microbicides acceptability. Paper presented at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
21. Feldblum, P. P., Weir, S. S., & Cates, W., Jr. (1999). The protective effect of condoms and nonoxynol-9 against HIV infection: A response to Wittkowski and colleagues. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 108-110.
22. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Home Page. Retrieved June 15, 2002, from http://FDA.GOV.
23. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Device Evaluation Information Retrieved March 30, 2003, from http://www.FDA.GOV/ CDRH/ODE/WHATWEDO.HTML.
24. Frank, M. L., Poindexter, A. N., Cox, C. A., & Bateman, L. (1995). A cross-sectional survey of condom use in conjunction with other contraceptive methods. Women's Health Journal, 23, 31-46.
25. Gambone, J., & Tabbush, V. (2002, April 16). Cost-effectiveness of a fertility monitoring device. Presented at "Healthcare Financing for the 21st Century," University of Maryland.
26. Glasier, A., & Baird, D. (1998). The effects of self-administering emergency contraception. New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 1-4.
27. Gollub, E. L. (2000). The female condom: Tool for women's empowerment. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1377-1381.
28. Good, B. J. (1997). The heart of what's the matter: The semantics of illness in Iran. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 1, 25-58.
29. Halloran, M. E., Longini I. M. Jr., Haber, M. J., Struchiner, C. J., & Brunet, R. C. (1994). Exposure efficacy and change in contact rates in evaluating prophylactic HIV vaccines in the field. Statistics in Medicine, 13, 357-377.
30. Haney, D. Q. (2001, August 25). AIDS turnaround: Researchers suddenly upbeat over vaccine prospects. Retrieved August 27, 2001, from the Associated Press Web site: http://www.ap.org
31. Hardee, K., Balogh, S., & Villinski, M. T. (1997). Three countries' experience with Norplant introduction. Health Policy and Planning, 12 199-213.
32. Hardy, E., de Padua, K. S., Jimenez, A. L., & Zaneveld, L. J. (1998). Women's preferences for vaginal antimicrobial contraceptives: Preferred characteristics according to women's age and socio-economic status. Contraception, 58, 239-244.
33. HIV Vaccine Trials Network. Retrieved February 20, 2003, from http://www.HVTN.ORG/Science/trials.html.
34. The impact of patient experience or practice: The acceptability of emergency contraceptive pills in inner-city clinics. (1998). Journal of the American Medical Association, 53, 255-257.
35. Jones, D. L., Weiss, S. M., Malow, M. I., Devieux, J., Stanley, H., Cassells, A., et al. (2001). A brief sexual barrier intervention for women living with AIDS: Acceptability, use, and ethnicity. Journal of Urban Health, 78, 593-604.
36. Keller, A. (1979). Contraceptive acceptability research: Utility and limitations. Studies in Family Planning, 10, 230-241.
37. Latka, M., Gollub, E. L., French, P., & Stein, Z. (in press). Male and female condom use among women after counseling in a risk reduction hierarchy for STD prevention. Sexually Transmitted Diseases.
38. Magiri, B., Onoka, C., Trangsrud, R., Steiner, M., Spruyt, A., Joanis, C., et al. (1993). Contraceptive film acceptability: study: Kenya. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International.
39. Marshall, J. (1977). Acceptability of fertility regulating methods: Designing technology to fit people. Preventive Medicine, 6, 65-73.
40. Miller, W. B., Severy, L. J., & Pasta, D. J. (2004). A framework for modeling fertility motivation in couples. Population Studies, 58, 193-205.
41. Minnis, A. M., Shiboski, S. C., & Padian, N. S. (2003). Barrier contraceptive method acceptability and choice are not reliable indicators of use. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 30, 556-561.
42. Moon, M. W., Khumalo-Sakutukwa, G. N., Heiman, J. E., Mbizvo, M. T., & Padian, N. (2002). Vaginal microbicides for HIV/STD prevention in Zimbabwe: What key informants say. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 13, 19-23.
43. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. (n.d.) Home Page. Retrieved April 23, 2003, from http://www.NIAID.NIH.GOV
44. Nelson, A. (2002). First contraceptive patch offers once-a-week dosing. Contraceptive Technology Update Vol. 23, 1-3.
45. Newcomer, S. (2002, May 12-15). Rapporteur: Acceptability studies. Paper presented at Microbicides 2002 Conference, Antwerp, Belgium.
46. Padian, N. (1999, October). Measurement issues. Paper presented at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
47. Painter, T. M. (2001). Voluntary counseling and testing for couples: A high-leverage intervention for HIV/AIDS prevention in sub-Saharan Africa. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 1397-1411.
48. Penman-Aguilar, A., Hall, J., Artz, L., Crawford, M. A., Peacock, N., van, Olphen, J., Parker, L., & Macaluso, M. (2002). Presenting the female condom to men: A dyadic analysis of effect of the woman's approch. Women and Health, 35, 37-51.
49. Ramjee, G., Gouws, E., Andrews, A., Myer, L., & Weber, A. E. (2001). The acceptability of a vaginal microbicide among South African men. International Family Planning Perspectives, 27, 164-170.
50. Raphan, G., Cohen, S., & Boyer, A. M. (2001). The female condom, a tool for empowering sexually active urban adolescent women. Journal of Urban Health, 78, 605-613.
51. Rickert, V. I., Sanghvi, R., & Wiemann, C. M. (2002). Is lack of assertiveness among adolescent and young women a cause for concern? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34, 178-183.
52. Rosenberg, M., & Gollub, E. (1992). Commentary: methods women can use that may prevent sexually transmitted disease, including HIV. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 1473-1478.
53. Santelli, J., Rochat, R., Hatfield-Timajchy, K., Gilbert, B. C., Curtis, K., Cabral, R. et al. (2003). The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35, 94-101.
54. Severy, L. J. (1999). Acceptability as a critical component of clinical trials. In L. J. Severy & W. B. Miller (Eds.), Advances in population: Psychosocial perspectives, Vol. 3 (pp. 103-122). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
55. Severy, L. J., McNulty, J., Findley-Klein, F., & Robinson, J. (2004). Assessing the acceptability of innovative contraceptive technology: Participation profiles and implications for clinical trial success. Manuscript submitted for publication.
56. Severy, L. J., & Silver, S. E. (1993). Two reasonable people: Joint decision-making in fefrtility regulation. In L. J. Severy (Ed.), Advances in population: Psychosocial perspectives, Vol. 1 (pp. 207-227). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
57. Severy, L. J., & Spieler, J. (2000). New methods of family planning: Implications for intimate behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 258-265.
58. Severy, L. J., & Thapa, S. (1994). Preferences and tolerance as determinants of contraceptive acceptability. In L. J. Severy (Ed.), Advances in population: Psychosocial perspectives, Vol. 2 (pp. 207-227). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
59. Skibiak, J. P., Ahmed, Y., & Ketata, M. (1999). Testing strategies to improve access to emergency contraception pills: Prescription vs prophylactic distribution. Nairobi, Kenya: The Population Council, Africa OR/TA Project.
60. Snowden, R. (1996). Human reproductive behavior: General principles. In J. Bonnar (Ed.), Natural contraception through personal hormone monitoring: Proceedings of a symposium held at the XIV Figo World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics (pp. 45-53). New York: Parthenon Publishing Group.
61. Spieler, J. (1997, March). Behavior issues in dual protection. Paper presented at the Psychosocial Workshop, Population Association of America, Washington, DC.
62. Stein, Z. (1996). Family planning, sexually transmitted diseases, and the prevention of AIDS-divided we fail? American Journal of Public Health, 86, 783-784.
63. Thomson, E., & Hoem, J. (1998). Couple childbearing plans and births in Sweden. Demography, 35, 315-322.
64. Tolley, E. L., Loza, S., Kafafi, L., & Cummings, S. (2003). The impact of menstrual changes on method use: A comparative study among women using the IUD, DMPA and Norplant. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International.
65. Treiman, K., Liskin, L., Kols, A., & Rinehart, W. (1995). IUDs-An Update. Population Reports, 23(5) PP.
66. UNAIDS. (2002). Report on the global HIV/AIDS epidemic. The Barcelona report. New York: Author.
67. USAID. (1999). USAID fact sheet on emergency contraception. Unpublished document provided by J. Spieter, Chief, Research Division, office of Population, United States Agency for International Development. Washington, DC.
68. Westoff, C. F., & Ryder, N. B. (1977). The predictive validity of reproductive intentions. Demography, 14, 431-453.
69. What do women want? The answer is simple: Convenient birth control. (2002). Contraceptive Technology Update, (23), 13-15.