Acceptability of an existing, female-controlled contraceptive method that could potentially protect against HIV: A comparison of diaphragm users and other method users

Women's Health Issues

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 85-93

  Bird, Sheryl Thorburn ^a   Harvey, S Marie ^a,b   Maher, Julie E ^c   Beckman, Linda J ^d  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^c OREGON DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES   (United States)

^d ALLIANT INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Barrier methods; Diaphragm; Female controlled methods; Heterosexual transmission of HIV; Sexually transmitted diseases; Women's health

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONDOM; CONTRACEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE TRANSMISSION; FEMALE; FEMALE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INFECTION CONTROL; INFECTION PREVENTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MOTIVATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PILL; POPULATION RISK; PREVALENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE; TELEPHONE TELEMETRY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES, FEMALE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; MIDDLE AGED; OREGON; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 2342637912     PISSN: 10493867     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2004.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anderson, D. (2002, September). The cervix: The Achilles heel of the female reproductive tract: HIV immunology. Paper presented at the Diaphragm Renaissance: The Role of Cervical Barriers, Seattle, Washington
2. Beckman L.J., Harvey S.M., Murray J. Dimensions of the multidimensional contraceptive attributes questionnaire (CAQ). Psychology of Women Quarterly. 16:1992;243-259
3. Brafford L.J., Beck K.H. Development and validation of a condom self-efficacy scale for college students. Journal of American College Health. 39:1991;219-225
4. Branch M. R., Harvey S. M., Casillas A. Bird S. T. (2003, November). A new look at an old method: Exploring diaphragm use as a potential HIV prevention strategy among high risk women. Paper presented at the American Public Health Association Conference, San Francisco, CA
5. Cohen, C. R. (2002, May). The diaphragm: A female controlled method to prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted infections? Paper presented at Microbicides, Antwerp, Belgium
6. Diaphragm Renaissance: The Role of Cervical Barriers. (2002, September). Meeting Sponsored by Ibis Reproductive Health, University of California at San Francisco and Program for Appropriate Technology in Health, Seattle, WA
7. Ellertson C., Burns M. Re-examining the role of cervical barrier devices. Outlook. 20:(2):2003;1-8
8. Gollub E.L. Human rights is a US problem, too The case of women and HIV. American Journal of Public Health. 89:1999;1479-1482
9. Harvey S.M., Bird S.T., Branch M.R. A new look at an old method The diaphragm. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 35:2003;270-273
10. Harvey S.M., Bird S.T., Maher J., Beckman L.J. Who continues using the diaphragm and who doesn't Implications for the acceptability of female-controlled HIV prevention methods. Women's Health Issues. 13:2003;185-193
11. Levy, J. (2002, September). Keynote address: Overview of science. Paper presented at the Diaphragm Renaissance: The Role of Cervical Barriers, Seattle, Washington
12. Maher, J. E., Harvey, S. M., Bird, S. T., Stevens, V. J., & Beckman, L. J. (In press). Acceptability of the vaginal diaphragm among current users. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
13. Mantell J.E., Hoffman S., Exner T.M., Stein Z.A., Atkins K. Family planning providers' perspectives on dual protection. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 35:2003;71-78
14. Moench T.R., Chipato R., Padian N.S. Preventing disease by protecting the cervix The unexplored promise of internal vaginal barrier devices. AIDS. 15:2001;1595-1602
15. Piccinino L.J., Mosher W.D. Trends in contraceptive use in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives. 30:1998;4-10., 46
16. Schwartz J.L., Gabelnick H.L. Current contraceptive research. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 34:2002;310-316
17. Stein Z. HIV prevention An update on the status of methods women can use. American Journal of Public Health. 83:1993;1379-1382
18. Stein Z. Editorial More on women and the prevention of HIV infection. American Journal of Public Health. 85:1995;1485-1487
19. Stein Z., Susser M. Annotation Prevention of HIV, other sexually transmitted diseases, and unwanted pregnancy - testing physical barriers available to women. American Journal of Public Health. 88:1998;872-874
20. Stone K.M., Timyan J., Thomas E.L. Barrier methods for the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Holmes K.K., Mardh P., Sparling P.F., et al. Sexually transmitted diseases. 1999;1307-1321 McGraw-Hill, New York
21. Trussell J., Strickler J., Vaughan B. Contraceptive efficacy of the diaphragm, the sponge and the cervical cap. Family Planning Perspectives. 25:1993;100-105
22. Trussell J., Vaughan B. Contraceptive failure, method-related discontinuation and resumption of use Results from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Family Planning Perspectives. 31:1999;64-72