Who continues using the diaphragm and who doesn't: Implications for the acceptability of female-controlled HIV prevention methods

Women's Health Issues

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 185-193

  Harvey, S Marie ^a   Bird, Sheryl Thorburn ^b   Maher, Julie E ^c,d   Beckman, Linda J ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^d OREGON DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES   (United States)

^e ALLIANT INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Barrier methods; Diaphragms; Female controlled methods; Heterosexual transmission of HIV; Sexually transmitted diseases; Women's health

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPLIANCE (PHYSICAL); CONTRACEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INFECTION PREVENTION; INFECTION RISK; NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION; PREVALENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SELF CONCEPT; SEXUAL TRANSMISSION; TELEPHONE; VAGINA PESSARY; VIRUS TRANSMISSION;

EID: 0142199810     PISSN: 10493867     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1049-3867(03)00040-9     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Amaro H. Love, sex and power Considering women's realities in HIV prevention . The American Psychologist. 50:1995;437-447.
2. Amaro H., Raj A. On the margin Power and women's HIV risk reduction strategies . Sex Roles. 42:(7/8):2000;723-749.
3. Austin H., Louv W.C., Alexander W.J. A case-control study of spermicides and gonorrhea. JAMA. 251:1984;2822-2824.
4. Becker T.M., Wheller C.M., McGough N.S., et al. Contraceptive and reproductive risks for cervical dysplasia in southwestern Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. International Journal of Epidemiology. 23:1994;913-922.
5. Beckman L.J., Harvey S.M., Murray J. Development of a multidimensional contraceptive attributes questionnaire (CAQ). Psychology Women Quarterly. 16:1992;243-259.
6. Blanc A.K. The effect of power in sexual relationships on sexual and reproductive health An examination of the evidence . Studies in Family Planning. 32:2001;189-213.
7. Brafford L.J., Beck K.H. Development and validation of a condom self-efficacy scale for college students. Journal of American College Health. 39:1991;219-225.
8. Catania J.A., Canchola J., Binson D., et al. National trends in condom use among at-risk heterosexuals in the United States. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 27:2001;176-182.
9. Cates W. Estimates of the incidence and prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 26:1999;S2-7.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999a). HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 11, 1-44.
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999b). HIV/AIDS Among U.S. Women: Minority and Young Women at Continuing Risk [serial online]. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nchstp/facts/women.pdf.
12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2001). HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 13, 1-44.
13. Cohen, C. R. (2002). The diaphragm: A female controlled method to prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted infections? Paper presented at Microbicides 2002; September 9-10, 2002; Antwerp, Belgium.
14. Diaphragm Renaissance: The Role of Cervical Barriers. Meeting Sponsored by Ibis Reproductive Health, University of California at San Francisco and Program for Appropriate Technology in Health; 2002; Seattle, WA.
15. Edwards S.R. The role of men in contraceptive decision-making Current knowledge and future implications . Family Planning Perspectives. 26:1994;77-82.
16. Eng T., Butler W.T. The hidden epidemic Confronting sexually transmitted diseases . 1997;National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
17. Ferreira A.C., Araujo M.J., Regina C.H., et al. Effectiveness of the diaphragm, used continuously, without spermicide. Contraception. 48:1993;29-35.
18. Gollub E.L. Human rights is a US problem, too The case of women and HIV . American Journal of Public Health. 89:1999;1479-1482.
19. Grady W.R., Klepinger D.H., Nelson-Wally A. Contraceptive characteristics The perceptions and priorities of men and women . Family Planning Perspectives. 31:1999;168-175.
20. Grady W.R., Tanfer K., Billy J.O.G., Lincoln-Hanson J. Men's perceptions of their role and responsibilities regarding sex, contraception and childrearing. Family Planning Perspectives. 28:1996;221-226.
21. Harvey S.M., Bird S.T., Galavotti C., Duncan E.W., Greenberg D. Relationship power, sexual decision-making and condom use among women at risk for HIV/STDs. Women Health. 36:2002;69-84.
22. Hayes R.J., Schulz K.F., Plummer F.A. The cofactor effect of genital ulcers on the per exposure risk of HIV transmission in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Tropical Medical Hygiene. 98:1995;1-8.
23. Hoffman, I., Maida, M., & Royce, R., et al. (1996). Effects of urethritis therapy on the concentration of HIV-1 in seminal plasma. Paper presented at the XI International Conference on AIDS; July 1996; Vancouver, Canada.
24. Kelaghan J., Rubin G.L., Ory H.W., Layde P.M. Barrier-method contraceptives and pelvic inflammatory disease. JAMA. 248:1982;184-187.
25. Laga M., Manoka A., Kivuvu M., et al. Non-ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases as risk factors for HIV-1 transmission in women Results from a cohort study . AIDS. 7:1997;95-102.
26. Magder L.S., Harrison H.R., Ehret J.M., Anderson T.S., Judson F.N. Factors related to genital chlamydia trachomatis and its diagnosis by culture in a sexually transmitted disease clinic. American Journal of Epidemiology. 128:1988;298-308.
27. Moench T.R., Chipato R., Padian N.S. Preventing disease by protecting the cervix The unexplored promise of internal vaginal barrier devices . AIDS. 15:2001;1595-1602.
28. Moss G.B., Overbaugh J., Welch M., et al. Human immunodeficiency virus DNA in urethral secretions in men Association with gonococcal urethritis in CD4 cell depletion . The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 172:1995;1469-1474.
29. Piccinino L.J., Mosher W.D. Trends in contraceptive use in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives. 30:1998;4-10, 46.
30. Rosenberg M.J., Davidson A.J., Chen J.-H., Judson F.N., Douglas J.M. Barrier contraceptives and sexually transmitted diseases in women A comparison of female-dependent methods and condoms . American Journal of Public Health. 82:1992;669-674.
31. Rothenberg R.B., Wasserheit J.N., St. Louis M.E., Douglas J.M. The effect of treating sexually transmitted diseases on the transmission of HIV in dually infected persons A clinic-based estimate . Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 27:2000;411-416.
32. Schwartz J.L., Gabelnick H.L. Current contraceptive research. Perspectives in Sex and Reproductive Health. 34:2002;310-316.
33. Severy L.J., Spieler J. New methods of family planning Implications for intimate behavior . Journal of Sex Research. 37:2000;258-265.
34. St. Louis M.E., Wasserheit J.N., Gayle H.D. Janus considers the HIV pandemic Harnessing recent advances to enhance AIDS prevention . American Journal of Public Health. 87:1997;10-12.
35. Stein Z. HIV prevention An update on the status of methods women can use . American Journal of Public Health. 83:1993;1379-1382.
36. Stein Z. Editorial More on women and the prevention of HIV infection . American Journal of Public Health. 85:1995;1485-1487.
37. Stein Z., Susser M. Annotation Prevention of HIV, other sexually transmitted diseases, and unwanted pregnancy - testing physical barriers available to women . American Journal of Public Health. 88:1998;872-874.
38. Stone K.M., Timyan J., Thomas E.L. Barrier methods for the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Holmes K.K., Mardh P., Sparling P.F., et al. Sexually transmitted diseases. 1999;McGraw-Hill, New York.
39. Van Damme L. Special report Microbicides 2002 . Health & Sexuality. 7:2002;5-9. (quarterly publication of the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals).
40. Wingood G.M., DiClemente R.J. Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health Education & Behavior. 27:2000;539-565.