Genres of empirical research in teacher education

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 3-11

  Borko, Hilda ^a   Liston, Dan ^a   Whitcomb, Jennifer A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845530811     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022487106296220     Document Type: Editorial

References (29)

1. American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Retrieved September 17, 2006, from www.aera.net/opportunities/?id=1480
2. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33 (8). 3-15.
3. Borko, H., Whitcomb, J., & Byrnes, K. (in press). Genres of research in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring issues in changing contexts (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
5. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2 (2). 141-178.
6. Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 307-333). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32 (1). 9-13.
8. Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). Ask a different question, get a different answer: The research base for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 55 (2). 111-115.
9. Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). Studying teacher education: What we know and need to know. Journal of Teacher Education, 56 (4). 301-306.
10. Cochran-Smith, M., & Donnell, K. (2006). Practitioner inquiry: Blurring the boundaries of research and practice. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 503-518). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, K. (2005). Researching teacher education in changing times: Politics and paradigms. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 69-109). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
12. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2004). Practitioner inquiry, knowledge, and university culture. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp 601-649). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
13. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32 (1). 5-8.
14. Eisenhart, M., & Borko, H. (1991). In search of an interdisciplinary collaborative design for studying teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 137-157.
15. Erikson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
16. Florio-Ruane, S. (2002). More light: An argument for complexity in studies of teaching and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 53 (3). 205-215.
17. Hostetler, K. (2005). What is "good" education research? Educational Researcher, 34 (6). 16-21.
18. Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Fuerer, M. J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32 (1). 25-28.
19. Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education [Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20. Shulman, L. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (3rd ed., pp. 3-36). New York: Macmillan.
21. Shulman, L. (2000). From Minsk to Pinsk: Why a scholarship of teaching and learning? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1 (1). 43-53.
22. Sleeter, C. (2001). Epistemological diversity in research on preservice teacher preparation for historically underserved children. Review in Research in Education, 25, 209-250.
23. Smith, M. L. (2006). Multiple methodology in education research. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 457-475). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Thorndike, E. L. (1910). The contribution of psychology to education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 5-12.
25. Whitcomb, J. (2003). Learning and pedagogy in initial teacher preparation. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), & I. B. Weiner (Editor in chief), Handbook of psychology, Volume 7: Educational psychology, (pp. 533-556). New York: John Wiley.
26. Wilson, S., Floden, R., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge and recommendations. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
27. Wilson, S. M. (2006). Finding a canon and core: Meditations on the preparation of teacher educator-researchers. Journal of Teacher Education, 57 (3). 315-325.
28. Zeichner, K. (1999). The new scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28 (9). 4-15.
29. Zeichner, K. (2005). A research agenda for teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 737-759). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.