Effects of a rostral motor cortex lesion on primary motor cortex hand representation topography in primates

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 51-61

  Friel, Kathleen M ^a,b   Barbay, Scott ^a   Frost, Shawn B ^a   Plautz, Erik J ^a   Stowe, Ann M ^a   Dancause, Numa ^a   Zoubina, Elena V ^a   Nudo, Randolph J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Cortical plasticity; Recovery; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN INFARCTION; BRAIN INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FEMALE; FOOD; MALE; MONKEY; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; NONHUMAN; PRIMATE; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; TRAINING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HAND; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR CORTEX; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL; SAIMIRI; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33845526258     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968306291851     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Boroojerdi B, Ziemann U, Chen R, et al. Mechanisms underlying human motor system plasticity. Muscle Nerve 2001 ; 24 (5). 602-613.
2. Buonomano DV, Merzenich MM. Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. Annu Rev Neurosci 1998 ; 21: 149-186.
3. Garraghty PE, Kaas JH, Florence SL. Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult and developing mammals. In: Casagrande VA, Shinkman PG, eds. Advances in neural and behavioral development. Vol 4. Norwood (NJ): Ablex ; 1995: 1-36.
4. Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Reorganization of neocortical representations after brain injury: a neurophysiological model of the bases of recovery from stroke. Prog Brain Res 1987 ; 71: 249-266.
5. Kolb B, Whishaw IQ. Plasticity in the neocortex: mechanisms underlying recovery from early brain damage. Prog Neurobiol 1989 ; 32 (4). 235-276.
6. Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM, Ochs MT, et al. Functional reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in adult owl monkeys after behaviorally controlled tactile stimulation. J Neurophysiol 1990 ; 63 (1). 82-104.
7. Recanzone GH, Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM. Frequency discrimination training engaging a restricted skin surface results in an emergence of a cutaneous response zone in cortical area 3a. J Neurophysiol 1992 ; 67 (5). 1057-1070.
8. Recanzone GH, Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM, et al. Topographic reorganization of hand representation in cortical area 3b of owl monkeys trained in a frequency-discrimination task. J Neurophysiol 1992 ; 67 (5). 1031-1056.
9. Clark SA, Allard T, Jenkins WM, et al. Receptive fields in the body-surface map in adult cortex defined by temporally correlated inputs. Nature 1988 ; 332 (6163). 444-445.
10. Allard T, Clark SA, Jenkins WM, et al. Reorganization of somatosensory area 3b representations in adult owl monkeys after digital syndactyly. J Neurophysiol 1991 ; 66 (3). 1048-1058.
11. Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM. Reorganization of cortical representations of the hand following alterations of skin inputs induced by nerve injury, skin island transfers, and experience. J Hand Ther 1993 ; 6 (2). 89-104.
12. Kleim JA, Barbay S, Nudo RJ. Functional reorganization of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning. J Neurophysiol 1998 ; 80 (6). 3321-3325.
13. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, et al. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci 1996 ; 16 (2). 785-807.
14. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1996 ; 75 (5). 2144-2149.
15. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, et al. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 1996 ; 272: 1791-1794.
16. Castro-Alamancos MA, Borrel J. Functional recovery of forelimb response capacity after forelimb primary motor cortex damage in the rat is due to the reorganization of adjacent areas of cortex. Neuroscience 1995 ; 68 (3). 793-805.
17. Glees P, Cole J. Recovery of skilled motor functions after small repeated lesions in motor cortex in macaque. J Neurophysiol 1950 ; 13: 137-148.
18. Friel KM, Nudo RJ. Recovery of motor function after focal cortical injury in primates: compensatory movement patterns used during rehabilitative training. Somatosens Mot Res 1998 ; 15 (3). 173-189.
19. Kennard MA. Age and other factors in motor recovery from pre-central lesions in monkeys. Am J Physiol 1936 ; 115: 138-146.
20. Finger S, Hart T, Jones E. Recovery time and sensorimotor cortex lesion effects. Physiol Behav 1982 ; 29 (1). 73-78.
21. Gentile AM, Green S, Nieburgs A, et al. Disruption and recovery of locomotor and manipulatory behavior following cortical lesions in rats. Behav Biol 1978 ; 22: 417-455.
22. Black P, Markowitz RS, Cianci SN. Recovery of motor function after lesions in motor cortex of monkey. Ciba Found Symp 1975 ; 34: 65-83.
23. Leonard CT, Goldberger ME. Consequences of damage to the sensorimotor cortex in neonatal and adult cats. I. Sparing and recovery of function. Brain Res 1987 ; 429 (1). 1-14.
24. Armand J, Kably B. Recovery of distal skills after neonatal lesion of the sensorimotor cortex in the cat. Neurosci Lett 1992 ; 138 (1). 45-48.
25. Hoffman DS, Strick PL. Effects of a primary motor cortex lesion on step-tracking movements of the wrist. J Neurophysiol 1995 ; 73 (2). 891-895.
26. Nudo RJ, Friel KM, Delia SW. Role of sensory deficits in motor impairments after injury to primary motor cortex. Neuropharmacology 2000 ; 39 (5). 733-742.
27. Passingham RE, Perry VH, Wilkinson F. The long-term effects of removal of sensorimotor cortex in infant and adult rhesus monkeys. Brain 1983 ; 106 (3). 675-705.
28. Rouiller EM, Yu XH, Moret V, et al. Dexterity in adult monkeys following early lesion of the motor cortical hand area: the role of cortex adjacent to the lesion. Eur J Neurosci 1998 ; 10 (2). 729-740.
29. Whishaw IQ, Pellis SM, Gourny BP, et al. The impairments in reaching and the movements of compensation in rats with motor cortex lesions: an endpoint, videorecording, and movement notation analysis. Behav Brain Res 1991 ; 42: 77-91.
30. Pribram KH, Kruger L, Robinson F, et al. The effects of precentral lesions on the behavior of monkeys. Yale J Biol Med 1956 ; 28: 428-443.
31. Liu Y, Rouiller EM. Mechanisms of recovery of dexterity following unilateral lesion of the sensorimotor cortex in adult monkeys. Exp Brain Res 1999 ; 128 (1-2). 149-159.
32. Tanji J, Wise SP. Submodality distribution in sensorimotor cortex of the unanesthetized monkey. J Neurophysiol 1981 ; 45 (3). 467-481.
33. Stepniewska I, Preuss TM, Kaas JH. Architectonics, somatotopic organization, and ipsilateral cortical connections of the primary motor area (M1) of owl monkeys. J Comp Neurol 1993 ; 330: 238-271.
34. Strick PL, Preston JB. Two representations of the hand in area 4 of a primate. II. Somatosensory input organization. J Neurophysiol 1982 ; 48 (1). 150-159.
35. Geyer S, Ledberg A, Schleicher A, et al. Two different areas within the primary motor cortex of man. Nature 1996 ; 382 (6594). 805-807.
36. Dancause N, Barbay S, Frost SB, et al. Extensive cortical rewiring after brain injury. J Neurosci 2005 ; 25 (44). 10167-10179.
37. Friel KM, Barbay S, Frost SB, et al. Dissociation of sensorimotor deficits after rostral versus caudal lesions in the primary motor cortex hand representation. J Neurophysiol 2005 ; 94 (2). 1312-1324.
38. Martin JH, Ghez C. Impairments in reaching during reversible inactivation of the distal forelimb representation of the motor cortex in the cat. Neurosci Lett 1991 ; 133 (1). 61-64.
39. Martin JH, Ghez C. Differential impairments in reaching and grasping produced by local inactivation within the forelimb representation of the motor cortex in the cat. Exp Brain Res 1993 ; 94 (3). 429-443.
40. Friel KM, Heddings AA, Nudo RJ. Effects of postlesion experience on behavioral recovery and neurophysiologic reorganization after cortical injury in primates. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2000 ; 14 (3). 187-198.
41. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993 ; 74: 347-354.
42. Taub E, Pidikiti D, DeLuca SC, et al. Effects of motor restriction of an unimpaired upper extremity and training on improving functional tasks and altering brain/behaviors. In: Toole JF, Good DC, eds. Imaging in neurologic rehabilitation. New York: Demos Vermande ; 1996: 133-154.
43. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - a clinical review [see Comments]. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999 ; 36 (3). 237-251.
44. Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, et al. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke 1999 ; 30 (3). 586-592.
45. Nudo RJ. Remodeling of cortical motor representations after stroke: implications for recovery from brain damage. Mol Psychiatry 1997 ; 2 (3). 188-191.
46. Donoghue JP, Leibovic S, Sanes JN. Organization of the forelimb area in squirrel monkey motor cortex: representation of digit, wrist, and elbow muscles. Exp Brain Res 1992 ; 89 (1). 1-19.
47. Nudo RJ. Adaptive plasticity in motor cortex: implications for rehabilitation after brain injury. J Rehabil Med 2003 ; 41 (Suppl.). 7-10.
48. Heddings AA, Friel KM, Plautz EJ, et al. Factors contributing to motor impairment and recovery after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2000 ; 14 (4). 301-310.
49. Xerri C, Merzenich MM, Peterson BE, et al. Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1998 ; 79 (4). 2119-2148.
50. Liepert J, Miltner WH, Bauder H, et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998 ; 250 (1). 5-8.
51. Plautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2000 ; 74 (1). 27-55.
52. Remple MS, Bruneau RM, VandenBerg PM, et al. Sensitivity of cortical movement representations to motor experience: evidence that skill learning but not strength training induces cortical reorganization. Behav Brain Res 2001 ; 123 (2). 133-141.
53. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999 ; 80 (6). 624-628.
54. Taub E, Wolf SL. Constraint induced movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997 ; 3: 38-61.
55. Liepert J, Uhde I, Graf S, et al. Motor cortex plasticity during forced-use therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. J Neurol 2001 ; 248 (4). 315-321.