Advanced computing for systems biology

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 390-398

  Burrage, Kevin ^a   Hood, Lindsay ^b   Ragan, Mark A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Computational modelling; High performance computing; Multi scale simulation; Orthologue mapping; Systems biology; Visible Cell

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CELL STRUCTURE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CYTOLOGY; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOMICS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; ORTHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; WEB BROWSER;

ANIMALS; CELLS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENOMICS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 33845484059     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbl033     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Kitano H. Computational systems biology. Nature 2002;420:206-10.
2. Finkelstein A, Hetherington J, Li L, et al. Computational challenges of systems biology. Computer 2004;37:26-33.
3. Russel J (ed). Bio-IT World Briefing on: System Biology. http://cms.bioitworld.com/whitepapers#briefings.Framingham MA: Bio-IT World, 2005 (20 April 2006, date last accessed).
4. Emmott S (ed). Towards 2020 Science. Cambridge UK: Microsoft Research, 2006. http://research.microsoft.com/towards2020science (20 April 2006, date last accessed).
5. Cassman M. Barriers to progress in systems biology. Nature 2005;438:1079.
6. TeraGrid project. http://www.teragrid.org (26 August 2006, date last accessed)
7. Foster I, Kesselman C. The Grid 2: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2003.
8. Fitch WM. Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst Zool 1970;19:99-113.
9. Mushegian AR, Koonin EV. A minimal gene set for cellular life derived by comparison of complete bacterial genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:10268-73.
10. Beiko RG, Harlow TJ, Ragan MA. Highways of gene sharing in prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:14332-7.
11. Harlow TJ, Gogarten JP, Ragan MA. A hybrid clustering approach to recognition of protein families in 114 microbial genomes. BMC Bioinform 2004;5:45.
12. van Dongen S. The MCL FAQ. http://micans.org/mcl/man/mclfaq.html (20 April 2006, date last accessed).
13. Beiko RG, Chan CX, Ragan MA. A word-oriented approach to alignment validation. Bioinformatics 2005;21:2230-9.
14. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F, Nielsen R, et al. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 2001;294:2310-4.
15. Mar JC, Harlow TJ, Ragan MA. Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses of protein sequence data under relative branch-length differences and model violation. BMC Bioinform 2005;5:8.
16. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1572-4.
17. Taverna project. Taverna 1.3.1. http://taverna.sourceforge.net (21 April 2006, date last accessed).
18. Shah SP, He DYM, Sawkins JN, et al. Pegasys: Software for executing and integrating analyses of biological sequences. BMC Bioinform 2004;5:40.
19. Garcia A, Thoraval S, Garcia LJ, et al. Workflows in bioinformatics: meta-analysis and prototype implementation of a workflow generator. BMC Bioinform 2005;6:87.
20. Carrere S, Gouzy J. REMORA: A pilot in the ocean of BioMoby web-services. Bioinformatics 2006;22:900-1.
21. Hunter J, Ragan MA, Little S. Position paper for Semantic Web Life Sciences Workshop (Visible Cell Project). http://metadata.net/sunago/ fusion/position_paper-visible_cell.html (4 May 2006, date last accessed).
22. Tomita M. Whole-cell simulation: A grand challenge of the 21st century. Trends Biotechnol 2001;19:205-10.
23. Slepchenko BM, Schaff JC, Macara I, et al. Quantitative cell biology with the Virtual Cell. Trends Cell Biol 2003;13:570-6.
24. Sundararaj S, Guo A, Habibi-Nazhad B, et al. The CyberCell Database (CCDB): A comprehensive, self-updating, relational database to coordinate and facilitate in silico modelling of Escherichia coli. Nucl Acids Res 2004;32:D293-5.
25. Doi A, Nagasaki M, Fujita S, et al. Genomic Object Net: II. Modeling biopathways by hybrid functional Petri net with extension. Appl Bioinform 2004;2:185-8.
26. Booch G. Object Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications, 2nd. Redwood City, CA: Benjamin Cummings, 1993.
27. Moore R. Persistent Archives for Data Collections. SDSC TR-1999-2. October 1999. http://www.sdsc.edu/dice/Pubs/sdsc-tr-1999-2.pdf (20 April 2006, date last accessed).
28. Arkin A, Ross J, McAdams HH. Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cell. Genetics 1998;149:1633-48.
29. Hasty J, McMillen D, Isaacs F, et al. Computational studies of gene regulatory networks: In numero molecular biology. Nat Rev Genet 2001;2:268-79.
30. Kærn M, Elston TC, Blake WJ, et al. Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes. Nat Rev Genet 2005;6:451-64.
31. McAdams HH, Arkin A. Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:814-9.
32. Gillespie DT. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J Phys Chem 1977;81:340-61.
33. Kierzek AM. STOCKS: Stochastic kinetic simulations of biochemical systems with Gillespie algorithm. Bioinformatics 2002;18:470-81.
34. Shea MA, Ackers GK. The OR control system of bacteriophage lambda: A physical-chemical model for gene regulation. J Mol Biol 1985;181:211-30.
35. Gillespie DT. Approximate accelerated stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systems. J Chem Phys 2001;115:1716-33.
36. Tian T, Burrage K. Binomial leap methods for simulating stochastic chemical kinetics. J Chem Phys 2004;121:10356-64.
37. Haseltine EL, Rawlings JB. Approximate simulation of coupled fast and slow reactions for stochastic chemical kinetics. J Chem Phys 2002;117:6959-69.
38. Goutsias J. Quasiequilibrium approximation of fast reaction kinetics in stochastic biochemical systems. J Chem Phys 2005;122:1-15.
39. Rao C, Arkin A. Stochastic chemical kinetics and the quasi-steady-state assumption: Application to the Gillespie algorithm. J Chem Phys 2003;118:4999-5010.
40. Burrage K, Tian T, Burrage P. A multi-scaled approach for simulating chemical reaction systems. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2004;85:217-34.
41. Burrage K, Burrage P, Jeffrey S, et al. A grid implementation of chemical kinetic simulation methods in genetic regulation. In: Proceedings of APAC03 Conference on Advanced Computing, Grid Applications and e-Research, ISBN 0-9579303, 2003, 1-3.
42. Munsky B, Khammash M. The finite state projection algorithm for the solution of the chemical master equation. J Chem Phys 2006;124:044104.
43. Burrage K, Hegland M, MacNamara S, et al. A Krylov-based finite state projection algorithm for solving the chemical master equation arising in the discrete modelling of biological systems. In: Proceedings of the Markov 150th Anniversary Conference, in press.
44. Sidje RBS. Expokit: Software package for computing matrix exponentials. ACM Trans Math Software 1998;24:130-56.
45. Kobayashi H, Kærn M, Araki M, et al. Programmable cells: Interfacing natural and engineered gene networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:8414-9.
46. Higgins E, Sneyd J. Modelling the cardiac calcium transient using grid refinement and an ADI algorithm. Technical Report, Deptment of Mathematics, University of Auckland, New Zealand, 2006.
47. Orton RJ, Sturm OE, Vyshemirsky V, et al. Computational modeling of the receptor-tyrosine-kinase-activated MAPK pathway. Biochem J 2005;392:249-61.
48. Schoeberl B, Eichler-Jonsson C, Gillies ED, et al. Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors. Nature Biotechnol 2002;20:370-5.
49. Hunter PJ, Robbins P, Noble D. The IUPS Physiome Project. Eur J Physiol 2002;445:1-9.
50. Gavaghan DJ, Simpson AC, Lloyd S, et al. Towards a Grid infrastructure to support integrative approaches to biological research. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 2005;363:1829-41.
51. Lloyd CM, Halstead MDB, Nielsen PF, et al. CellML: Its future, present and past. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2004;85:433-50.
52. Globus Alliance. Components for Grid security. http://www.globus.org/ grid_software/security/ (20 April 2006, date last accessed).
53. Internet2. Shibboleth. http://shibboleth.internet2.edu/ (20 April 2006, date last accessed).
54. Berners-Lee T. Semantic web roadmap. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/ Semantic.html (2 May 2006, date last accessed).
55. W3C. OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. http://www.w3.org/TR/ owl-features/ (2 May 2006, date last accessed).
56. Wilkinson M. moby. http://biomoby.org (2 May 2006, date last accessed).
57. Bradbury RH. Do standards liberate or enslave? AURISA 93 Data Standards Workshop, Adelaide, 22 November 1993.