A normative pragmatic perspective on appealing to emotions in argumentation

Argumentation

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 327-343

  Manolescu, Beth Innocenti ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Emotional appeal; Frederick Douglass; Informal logic; Normative pragmatics; Pragma dialectics; Rhetoric

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845463314     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-006-9016-9     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. American Anti-Slavery Society: 2005, 'Declaration of Sentiments', in R. F. Reid and J. F. Klumpp, (eds.) American Rhetorical Discourse, 3rd ed., pp. 310-314, Waveland Press, Long Gove, IL.
2. Blassingame, J. W.: 1982, The Frederick Douglass Papers, Series One: Speeches, Debates, and Interviews, Vol. 2, Yale University Press, New Haven.
3. Branham, R.: 1999, 'Abolitionist Reconstructions of July Fourth', in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, and C. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, pp. 65-73, Sic Sat, Amsterdam.
4. Brinton, A.: 1988a, Appeal to the Angry Emotions, Informal Logic 10, 77-87.
5. Brinton, A.: 1988b, Pathos and the "Appeal to Emotion": An Aristotelian Analysis, History of Philosophy Quarterly 5, 207-219.
6. Brinton, A.: 1994, A Plea for Argumentum ad misericordiam Philosophia 23, 25-44..
7. Douglass, F.: 1999, 'What to the Slave is the Fourth of July? Extract from an Oration, at Rochester, July 5, 1852', in J W. Blassingame, J. R. McKivigan and P. P. Hinks, (eds.) The Frederick Douglass Papers, Series Two: Autobiographical Writings, Vol. 2, pp. 264-268, Yale University Press, New Haven.
8. Eemeren, F. H. van: 1987, 'Argumentation Studies' Five Estates', in J. W. Wenzel (ed.), Argument and Critical Practices: Proceedings of the Fifth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, pp. 9-24, Speech Communication Association, Annandale, VA.
9. Eemeren, F. H. van: 1990, The Study of Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics, Text 10(1/2): 37-44.
10. Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
11. Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 2004, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Eemeren, F. H. van, R. Grootendorst and F. S. Henkemans: 2002, Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
13. Eemeren, F. H. van, R. Grootendorst, F. S. Henkemans, et al.: 1996, Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
14. Eemeren, F. H. van, R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson and S. Jacobs: 1993, Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
15. Eemeren, F. H. van and P. Houtlosser: 1997, 'Rhetorical Rationales for Dialectical Moves: Justifying Pragma-Dialectical Reconstructions', in J. F. Klumpp, (ed.) Argument in a Time of Change: Definitions, Frameworks, and Critiques, pp. 51-56, National Communication Association, Annandale, VA.
16. Eemeren, F. H. van and P. Houtlosser: 1999, Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse, Discourse Studies 1, 479-497.
17. Eemeren, F. H. van and P. Houtlosser: 2000, Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework: The Case of R. J. Reynolds, Argumentation 14, 293-305.
18. Eemeren, F. H. van and P. Houtlosser: 2001, Managing Disagreement: Rhetorical Analysis Within a Dialectical Framework, Argumentation and Advocacy 37, 150-157.
19. Eemeren, F. H. van and P. Houtlosser: 2003, 'More about Fallacies as Derailments of Strategic Maneuvering: The Case of tu quoque', IL@25, Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, retrieved 21 July 2004 〈http://venus.uwindsor.ca/faculty/arts/philosophy/ILat25/ edited_vanEemerenHoutlosser.doc〉.
20. Fusfield W. D.: 1999, "'Scorching Irony, Not Convincing Argument, is Needed": Frederick Douglass on Some Rhetorical Limitations of Argumentation', in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, pp. 216-220, Sic Sat, Amsterdam.
21. Gilbert, M. A.: 1997, Coalescent Argumentation, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
22. Gilbert, M. A.: 2001, Emotional Messages, Argumentation 15, 239-249.
23. Goodwin, J.: 2000, Comments on "Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics", Argumentation 14, 287-292.
24. Goodwin, J.: 2001, Cicero's Authority, Philosophy and Rhetoric 34, 38-60.
25. Goodwin, J.: 2002, 'Designing Issues', in F H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser, (eds.) Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, pp. 81-96, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
26. Goodwin, J.: 2003, 'Manifestly Adequate Premises', IL@25, Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, retrieved 21 July 2004 〈http://venus. uwindsor.ca/faculty/arts/philosophy/ILat25/edited_Goodwin.doc〉.
27. Govier, T.: 2005, A Practical Study of Argument, 6th ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
28. Innocenti, B.: 1994, Towards a Theory of Vivid Description as Practiced in Cicero's Verrine Orations, Rhetorica 12, 355-381.
29. Jacobs, S.: 1999, 'Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics', in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 397-403, Sic Sat, Amsterdam.
30. Jacobs, S.: 2000, Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics, Argumentation 14, 261-286.
31. Kauffeld, F. J.: 1995, 'The Persuasive Force of Argumentation on Behalf of Proposals', in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Vol. 2, pp. 79-90, Sic Sat, Amsterdam.
32. Kauffeld, F. J.: 1998, Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing, Argumentation 12, 245-266.
33. Manolescu, B. I.: 2004, Formal Propriety as Rhetorical Norm, Argumentation 18, 113-125.
34. Manolescu, B. I.: 2005, Norms of Presentational Force, Argumentation and Advocacy 41, 139-151.
35. O'Keefe, D. J.: 1982, 'The Concepts of Argument and Arguing', in J R. Cox and C. A. Willard (eds.) Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research, pp. 3-23, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.
36. Walton, D.: 1992, The Place of Emotion in Argument, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.