Presumptions and the distribution of argumentative burdens in acts of proposing and accusing

Argumentation

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 245-266

  Kauffeld, Fred J ^a  

^a EDGEWOOD COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Accusing; Burden of proof; Deliberation; H. P. Grice; J. L. Austin; Judicial argumentation; Presumption; Proposing; Speech act

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845382352     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007704116379     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Anscombe, G. E. M.: 1957, Intention, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
2. Austin, J. L.: 1961, 'A Plea for Excuses', Philosophical Papers, Clarenden Press, Oxford.
3. Austin, J. L.: 1962, How to do Things with Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
4. Butler, J.: 1897, 'Dissertation II: Of the Nature of Virtue', in L. A. Selby-Biggs (ed.), British Moralists, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 245-256.
5. Cronkhite, G.: 1966, 'The Locus of Presumption', Central States Speech Journal 17, 270-276.
6. Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1990, 'Analyzing Argumentative Discourse', in R. Trapp and J. Schuetz (eds.), Perspectives on Argumentation, Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, pp. 86-106.
7. Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1991, 'The Study of Argumentation from a Speech Act Perspective', in J. Verschueren (ed.), Pragmatics at Issue, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 151-170.
8. Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.
9. Eemeren, F. H. van, R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson and S. Jacobs: 1993, Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse, The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
10. Gaskins, R. H.: 1992, Burdens of Proof in Modern Discourse, Yale University Press, New Haven.
11. Goodnight, T.: 1980, 'The Liberal and the Conservative Presumption: On Political Philosophy and the Foundation of Public Argument', Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation, Speech Communication Association, Falls Church, pp. 304-337.
12. Grice, H. P.: 1957, 'Meaning', Philosophical Review 62, 397-388.
13. Grice, H. P.: 1969, 'Utterer's Meaning and Intention', Philosophical Review 78, 147-177.
14. Grice, P.: 1989, 'Logic and Conversation', Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 22-40.
15. Kauffeld, F. J.: On Presuming and Presumption, forthcoming.
16. Kauffeld, F. J.: 1995a, 'On the Difference between Assumptions and Presumptions', in S. Jackson (ed.), Argumentation and Values: Proceedings of the Ninth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, Speech Communication Association, Falls Church, pp. 509-515.
17. Kauffeld, F. J.: 1995b, 'The Persuasive Force of Arguments on Behalf of Proposals', in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Analysis and Evaluation: Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Vol. I, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam, pp. 79-90.
18. Marsh, P.: 1964, 'Is Debate Merely a Game for Conservative Players', Speaker and Gavel 1, 2-17.
19. Morton, J. C. and S. C. Hutchison: 1987, The Presumption of Innocence, Carswell, Toronto.
20. O'Keefe, D. J.: 1995, 'Argumentation Studies and Dual-Process Models of Persuasion', in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation: Perspectives and Approaches, Vol. I, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam, pp. 3-19.
21. Parish, W. M.: 1929, 'Whately and his Rhetoric', Quarterly Journal of Speech 15, 58-79.
22. Pence, O. L.: 1953, 'The Concept and Function of Logical Proof in the Rhetorical System of Richard Whately', Speech Monographs 20, 23-38.
23. Petty, R. E. and J. T. Cacioppo: 1981, Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches, Wm. C. Browm Company, Dubuque.
24. Rogers, E. M. and F. F. Shoemaker: 1971, Communication of Innovations, Free Press, New York.
25. Scott, R. L.: 1960, 'On The Meaning of the Term Prima Facie in Argumentation', Central States Speech Journal 12, 33-37.
26. Sproule, J. M.: 1976, 'The Psychological Burden of Proof: On the Evolutionary Development of Richard Whately's Theory of Presumption', Communications Monographs 43, 115-129.
27. Stampe, D.: 1967, On the Acoustic Behavior of Rational Animals, Unpublished Paper, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.
28. Stampe, D.: 1970, Making Promises, Unpublished Paper, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
29. Stampe, D.: 1975, 'Meaning and Truth in the Theory of Speech Acts', in P. Cole, and J. Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts, Vol. 3, Academic Press, New York, pp. 25-38.
30. Strawson, P. F.: 1964, 'Intention and Convention in Speech Acts', Philosophical Review 73, 439-460.
31. Warnock, G. J.: 1971, The Object of Morality, Methuen, London.
32. Warnock, G. J.: 1973, 'Some Types of Performative Utterance', Essays on J. L. Austin, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 69-90.
33. Whately, R.: 1846, Elements of Rhetoric: Comprising an Analysis of the Laws of Moral Evidence and of Persuasion, with Rules for Argumentative Composition and Elocution, D. Ehninger (reprint edition, 1963), Southern Illinois Press, Carbondale.
34. White, A. R.: 1964, Attention, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.