Positive presentation management and intelligence and the personality differentiation by intelligence hypothesis in job applicants

International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 101-112

  De Fruyt, Filip ^a   Aluja, Anton ^b   García, Luis F ^b   Rolland, Jean Pierre ^c   Jung, Sung Cheol ^c  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LLEIDA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS OUEST NANTERRE LA DÉFENSE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845423026     PISSN: 0965075X     EISSN: 14682389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00337.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ackerman, P.L. and Heggestadt, E.D. (1997) Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219-245.
2. Allik, J. and Realo, A. (1997) Intelligence, academic abilities, and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 809-814.
3. Aluja, A., García, O., García, L.F. and Seisdedos, N. (2005) Invariance of the "NEO-PI-R" factor structure across exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1879-1890.
4. Austin, E.J., Hofer, S.M., Deary, I.J. and Eber, H.W. (2000) Interactions between intelligence and personality: Results from two large samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 405-427.
5. Ballenger, J.F., Caldwell-Andrews, A. and Baer, R.A. (2001) Effects of positive impression management on the NEO Personality Inventory - revised in a clinical population. Psychological Assessment, 13, 254-260.
6. Berry, D.T.R., Bagby, R.M., Smerz, J., Rinaldo, J.C., Caldwell-Andrews, A. and Baer, R.A. (2001) Effectiveness of NEO-PI-R research validity scales for discriminating analog malingering and genuine psychopathology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 496-516.
7. Bollen, K.A. (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
8. Brand, C.R., Egan, V. and Deary, I.J. (1994) Intelligence, personality, and society: Constructivist versus essentialist possibilities. In D.K. Detterman (Ed.), Current topics in human intelligence, Vol. 4. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9. Brebner, J. and Stough, C. (1995) Theoretical and empricial relationships between personality and intelligence. In D.G. Saklofske and M. Zeidner (Eds), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 321-347). New York: Plenum.
10. Browne, M.W. and Cudeck, R. (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen and J.S, Long (Eds), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Caldwell-Andrews, A., Baer, R.A. and Berry, D.T.R. (2000) Effects of response sets on NEO PI-R scores and their relations to external criteria. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 472-488.
12. Carroll, J.B. (1963) Human cognitive abilities; A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Costa, P.T. and McCrae, R.R. (1992) Professional manual: revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor-inventory (NEO-FPI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
14. Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R. and Rolland, J.P. (1998) NEO PI-R: Inventaire de Personnalité Révisé. Adaptation Française: Manuel [Revised NEO PI-R, French adaptation: Manual]. Paris: ECPA.
15. De Fruyt, F. and Salgado, J. (2003) Applied personality psychology: Lessons learned from the IWO field. European Journal of Personality, 17, S123-S131.
16. Deary, I.J., Egan, V., Gibson, G.J., Austin, E.J., Brand, C.R. and Kellaghan, T. (1996) Inteligence and the differentiation hypothesis. Intelligence, 23, 105-132.
17. Detterman, D.K. and Daniels, M.H. (1989) Correlations of mental tests with each other and with cognitive variables are highest for the low IQ groups. Intelligence, 13, 349-359.
18. Ellingson, J.E., Sackett, P.R. and Hough, L.M. (1999) Social desirability corrections in personality measurement: Issues of applicant comparison and construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 155-166.
19. Ellingson, J.E., Smith, D.B. and Sackett, P.R. (2001) Investigating the influence of social desirability on personality factor structure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 122-133.
20. Eysenck, H.J. and White, P.O. (1964) Personality and the measurement of intelligence. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 34, 197-202.
21. Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C. and Strahan, E.J. (1999) Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
22. Furnham, A., Moutafi, J. and Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2005) Personality and intelligence: Gender, the big five, self-estimated intelligence, and psychometric intelligence. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 11-24.
23. Harris, J.A., Vernon, P.A. and Jang, K.L. (2005) Testing the differentiation of personality by intelligence hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 277-286.
24. Hogan, J. and Holland, B. (2003) Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 100-112.
25. Hogan, R., De Fruyt, F. and Rolland, J.-P. (in press) Validité et intérêt des methods d'évaluation de la personnalité à des fins de selection: Une perspective de psychologie appliquée aux problématiques des entreprises. Psychologie Française.
26. Hu, L. and Bender, P.M. (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
27. Jensen, A.R. (1998) The g factor. The science of mental ability. London: Praeger.
28. Lienert, G.A. and Faber, C. (1963) Über die Faktorenstruktur des HAWIK auf verschiedenen Alters- und Intelligenzniveaus [On the factor structure of the HAWIK at various levels of age and intelligence]. Diagnostica, 9, 3-11.
29. Lynn, R. (1992) Does Spearman's g decline at higher IQ levels? Some evidence from Scotland. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 153, 229-230.
30. Marshall, M., De Fruyt, F., Rolland, J.-P. and Bagby, R.M. (2005) Socially desirable responding and the factorial stability of the NEO-PI-R. Psychological Assessment, 17, 379-384.
31. McCrae, R.R. and Allik, J. (Eds). (2002) The five-factor model of personality across cultures. New York: Kluwer Academic Press.
32. McCrae, R.R., Zonderman, A.B., Costa, P.T., Bond, M.H. and Paunonen, S.V. (1996) Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552-566.
33. Moutafi, J., Furnham, A. and Paltiel, L. (2005) Can personality predict intelligence? Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1021-1033.
34. Paulhus, D. (1991) Measurement and control of response bias. In J.P. Robinson, P.R. Shaver and L.S. Wrightsman (Eds), Measurement of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
35. Piedmont, R.L., McCrae, R.R., Riemann, R. and Angleitner, A. (2000) On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 582-593.
36. Raven, J., Raven, J.C. and Court, J.H. (1998) Les advanced progressive matrices: edition 1998. Paris: Editions et Applications Psychologiques.
37. Reid-Seiser, H.L. and Fritzsche, B.A. (2001) The usefulness of the NEO PI-R positive presentation management scale for detecting response distortion in employment contexts. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 639-650.
38. Salgado, J. and De Fruyt, F. (2005) Personality in personnel selection. In A. Evers, O. Smit-Voskuyl and N. Anderson (Eds.), International handbook of selection (pp. 174-198). Oxford: Black well.
39. Salgado, J.F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C. and De Fruyt, F. (2003a) International validity generalization of GMA and cognitive abilities as predictors of work behaviours: A European contribution and comparison with American findings. Personnel Psychology, 56, 573-605.
40. Salgado, J.F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., De Fruyt, F. and Rolland, J.-P. (2003b) A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1068-1081.
41. Schinka, J.A., Kinder, B.N. and Kremer, T. (1997) Research validity scales for the NEO PI-R: Development and initial validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 127-138.
42. Schmidt, F.L. and Hunter, J.E. (1998) The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
43. Schmit, M.J. and Ryan, A.M. (1993) The big five in personnel selection: Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 966-974.
44. Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A. and Dillon, W.R. (2005) A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58, 935-943.
45. Spearman, C. (1904) General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201-293.
46. Spearman, C. (1927) The abilities of man. New York: Macmillan.
47. Topping, G.D. and O'Gorman, J.G. (1997) Effects of faking set on validity of the NEO-FFI. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 117-124.
48. Young, M.S. and Schinka, J.A. (2001) Research validity scales for the NEO-PI-R: Additional evidence for reliability and validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 412-420.