Visual space perception: Phenomenology and function

Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia

Volumn 66, Issue 5 SUPPL., 2003, Pages 26-29

  Loomis, Jack M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Phenomenology; Space perception; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845259000     PISSN: 00042749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0004-27492003000600004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Brain WR. Mind, perception, and science. London: Blackwell, 1951.
2. Russell B. Human knowledge: Its scope and limits. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1948.
3. Smythies JR. The walls of Plato's cave. The science and philosophy of (brain, consciousness, and perception). Aldershot, England: Avebury, 1994.
4. Gogel WC. A theory of phenomenal geometry and its applications. Percept Psychophys 1990;48:105-23.
5. Lehar S. Gestalt isomorphism and the primacy of subjective conscious experience: A Gestalt bubble model. (http://cns-alumni.bu.edu/∼slehar/ webstuff/ bubw3/bubw3.html), submitted.
6. Loomis JM. Distal attribution and presence. Presence 1992;1:113-9.
7. Loomis JM, Knapp JM. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In: Hettinger LJ, Haas MW, editors, Virtual and Adaptive Environments. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum, in press.
8. Blank AA. Analysis of experiments in binocular space perception. J Opt Soc Am 1958;48:911-25.
9. Da Silva JA. Scales for perceived egocentric distance in a large open field: Comparison of three psychophysical methods. Am J Psychol 1985;98:119-44.
10. Foley JM. Binocular distance perception. Psychol Rev 1980;87:411-34.
11. Foley JM. Binocular space perception. In: Cronly-Dillon JR, General editor, Vision and Visual Dysfunction, Vol. 9, Regan D, editors, Binocular Vision. London: Macmillan, 1991, p.75-92.
12. Indow T. A critical review of Luneburg's model with regard to global structure of visual space. Psychol Rev 1991;98:430-53.
13. Gillinsky AS. Perceived size and distance in visual space. Psychol Rev 1951; 58:460-82.
14. Loomis JM, Philbeck JW. Is the anisotropy of perceived 3-D shape invariant across scale? Percept Psychophys 1999;61:397-402.
15. Wagner M. The metric of visual space. Percept Psychophys 1985;38:483-95.
16. Fukusima SS, Loomis JM, Da Silva JA. Visual perception of egocentric distance as assessed by triangulation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1997;23:86-100.
17. Loomis JM, Da Silva JA, Fujita N, Fukusima SS. Visual space perception and visually directed action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1992;18: 906-21.
18. Loomis JM, Philbeck JW, Zahorik P. Dissociation between location and shape in visual space. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, in press.
19. Gibson JJ. The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1950.
20. Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1979.
21. Warren WH. Visually controlled locomotion: 40 years later. Ecol Psychol 1998;10:177-219.
22. Crowell JA, Banks MS. Perceiving heading with different retinal regions and types of optic flow. Percept Psychophys 1993;53:325-37.
23. Beall AC, Loomis JM. Optic flow and visual analysis of the base-to-final turn. Int J Aviat Psychol 1997;7:201-23.
24. Yilmaz EH, Warren WH. Visual control of braking: a test of the tau-dot hypothesis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1995;21:996-1014.
25. Milner AD, Goodale MA. The visual brain in action. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
26. Bhalla M, Proffitt D. Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1999;25:1076-96.
27. Philbeck JW, Loomis JM, Beall AC. Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action. Percept Psychophys 1997;59:601-12.
28. Ooi TL, Wu B, He ZJ. Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon. Nature 2001;414:197-200.
29. Philbeck JW, Loomis JM. Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1997;23:72-85.
30. Loomis JM, Beall AC. Visually-controlled locomotion: Its dependence on optic flow, 3-D space perception, and cognition. Ecol Psychol 1998;10:271-85.