Auditory processing tests for Spanish-speaking adults: An initial study

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 45, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 645-659

  Fuente, Adrian ^a,b   McPherson, Bradley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Auditory processing; Binaural fusion; Dichotic stimulation; Filtered speech; Pattern tests; Speech in noise; Test battery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY MASKING; BINAURAL HEARING; CHILE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DICHOTIC LISTENING; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING TEST; HISPANIC; HONG KONG; HONG KONG CENTRAL AUDITORY PROCESSING ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEARING DISORDERS; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 33751580482     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020600937238     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Arnst, D.J. 1981. Errors on the staggered spondaic word (SSW) test in a group of adult normal listeners. Ear Hear, 2, 112-116.
2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 1996. Central auditory processing: current status of research and implications for clinical practice. Am J Audiol, 5, 41-53.
3. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2005. (Central) auditory processing disorders-the role of the audiologist. http://www.asha.org/nr/ rdonlyres/8A2204DE-EE09-443C-98AA-3722C18 214E3/0/v2PS_CAPD.pdf.
4. Baran, J.A., Bothfeld, R.W. & Musiek, F.E. 2004. Central auditory deficits associated with compromise of the primary auditory cortex. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 106-116.
5. Baran, J.A. & Musiek, F.E. 1999. Behavioral assessment of the central auditory nervous system. In F.E. Musiek & W.F. Rintelmann (eds.) Contemporary perspectives in hearing assessment. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 375-414.
6. nd ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Thomson.
7. Bocca, E., Calearo, C. & Cassinari, V. 1954. A new method for testing hearing in temporal lobe tumors. Acta Otolaryngol, 44, 219-221.
8. Boersma P. & Weenink D. 2003. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [computer software and manual]. Retrieved November 10, 2003, from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.
9. British Society of Audiology. 2006. Auditory processing disorder. British Society of Audiology Steering Group: http//www.thebsa.org.uk/apd/Home. htm#working%20def
10. Cameron, S., Barker, R. & Newall, P. 2003. Development and evaluation of an Australian version of the pediatric speech intelligibility test for auditory processing disorder. Aust NZ J Audiol, 25, 16-27.
11. Campbell, N.G. & Wilson, W.J. 2003. The performance of South African English first language child speakers on a 'low linguistically loaded' central auditory processing test protocol. S Afr J Commun Disord, 50, 15-18.
12. Chermak, G.D. & Musiek, F.E. 1997. Central auditory processing disorders: New perspectives. San Diego: Singular.
13. Demanez, L. & Demanez, J.P. 2003. Central auditory processing assessment. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg, 57, 243-252.
14. Demanez, L., Dony-Closon, B., Lhonneux-Ledoux, F. & Demanez, J.P. 2003. Central auditory processing assessment: A French-speaking battery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg, 57, 275-290.
15. Desgualdo, L.P. & Schochat, E. 1997. Processamento Auditivo Central, Manual de Avaliaçã o. São Paulo: Lovise.
16. Domitz, D. & Schow, R. 2000. A new CAPD battery, Multiple Auditory Processing Assessment: Factor analysis and comparisons with SCAN. Am J Audiol, 9, 101-111.
17. Frisina, D.R. & Frisina, R.D. 1997. Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: Relations to possible neural mechanisms. Hear Res, 106, 95-104.
18. Golding, M., Lilly, D.J. & Lay, J.W. 1996. A staggered spondaic word (SSW) test for Australian use. Aust J Audiol, 18, 81-88.
19. Golding, M. & Birtles, G. 2001. Macquarie University Speech Tests. Sydney: Macquarie University.
20. Hugdahl, K., Heiervang, E., Nordby, H., Smievoll, A.I., Steinmetz, H., et al. 1998. Central auditory processing, MRI morphometry and brain laterality: Applications to dyslexia. Scand Audiol Suppl, 49, 26-34.
21. Iliadou, V. & Kaprinis, S. 2003. Clinical psychoacoustics in Alzheimer's disease central auditory processing disorders and speech deterioration. Ann Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 2, 12.
22. International Organization for Standardization 1989. ISO 8253-1:1989 Acoustics. Audiometric test methods-Part 1: Basic pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. Geneva: ISO.
23. Jerger, J. 1970. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol, 92, 311-324.
24. Jerger, S. & Jerger, J. 1984. Pediatric Speech Intelligibility Test. St. Louis: Auditec.
25. Jerger, J. & Musiek, F. 2000. Report of the Consensus Conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 467-74.
26. Katz, J. 1962. The use of staggered spondaic words for assessing the integrity of the central auditory nervous system. J Aud Res, 2, 327-337.
27. Keith, R. 1995. Development and standardization of SCAN-A Test of auditory processing disorders in adolescents and adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 6, 286-92.
28. Keith, R. 2000a. Development and Standardization of SCAN-C Test for auditory processing disorders in children. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 438-445.
29. Keith, R. 2000b. Random Gap Detection. St. Louis: Auditec.
30. Kimura, D. 1961. Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. Can J Psychol, 15, 156-165.
31. Lynn, G.E., Gilroy, J., Taylor, P.C. & Leiser, R.P. 1981. Binaural masking-level differences in neurological disorders. Arch Otolaryngol, 107, 357-362.
32. Masquelier, M.P. 2003. Management of auditory processing disorders. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg, 57, 301-310.
33. th ed.). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 510-524.
34. Miller, G.A. 1947. The masking of speech. Psychol Bull, 44, 105-129.
35. Moncrieff, D., Jerger, J., Wambacq, I., Greenwald, R. & Black, J. 2004. ERP evidence of a dichotic left-ear deficit in some dyslexic children. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 518-534.
36. Musiek, F.E. 1983. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: The dichotic digit test revisited. Ear Hear, 4, 79-83.
37. Musiek, F.E. 1994. Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol, 5, 265-8.
38. Musiek, F.E. 1999. Central auditory tests. Scand Audiol, 28, Suppl 51, 33-46.
39. Musiek, F.E., Baran, J.A. & Pinheiro, M.L. 1990. Duration pattern recognition in normal subjects and patients with cerebral and cochlear lesions. Audiology, 29, 304-313.
40. Musiek, F.E. & Pinheiro, M.L. 1987. Frequency patterns in cochlear, brainstem, and cerebral lesions. Audiology, 26, 79-88.
41. th ed.). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 222-238.
42. Neijenhuis, K, Stollman, M., Snik, M. & Van den Broek, P. 2001. Development of a central auditory test battery for adults. Audiology, 40, 69-77.
43. Neijenhuis, K., Snik, A., Priester, G., Van Kordenoordt, S. & Van den Broek, P. 2002. Age effects and normative data on a Dutch test battery for auditory processing disorders. Int J Audiol, 41, 334-346.
44. Neijenhuis, K., Snik, A. & Van den Broek, P. 2003. Auditory processing disorders in adults and children: Evaluation of a test battery. Int J Audiol, 42, 391-400.
45. Noffsinger, D., Martinez, C.D. & Schaefer, A. 1982. Auditory brainstem responses and masking level differences from persons with brainstem lesions. Scand Audiol, 15, 81-93.
46. Ortiz, K.Z., Pereira, L.D., Borges, A.C. & Vilanova, L.C. 2002. Staggered spondaic word test in epileptic patients. Sao Paulo Med J, 120, 185-8.
47. Pinheiro, M. 1977. Tests of central auditory function in children with learning disabilities. In R. Keith (ed.), Central auditory dysfunction. New York, Grune & Stratton, pp. 223-256.
48. Pinheiro, M.L. & Musiek, F.E. 1985. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction. Foundation and clinical correlates. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
49. Rosemblüt, B. & De Cruz, J. 1962. Listas de palabras para pruebas de discriminación. Revista de Otorrinolaringología, 22, 37-49.
50. Santos, M.F.C. & Pereira, L.D. 1997. Escuta com digitos. In L.D. Pereira & E. Schochat (eds.) Processamento Auditivo Central: Manual de avaliação. São Paulo: Lovise, pp. 147-149.
51. Sapir, S., Maimon, T. & Eviatar, Z. 2002. Linguistic and nonlinguistic auditory processing of rapid vowel formant (F2) modulations in university students with and without developmental dyslexia. Brain Cogn, 48, 520-526.
52. Saunders, G.H. & Haggard, M.P. 1992. The clinical assessment of 'Obscure Auditory Dysfunction' (OAD) 2. Case control analysis of determining factors. Ear Hear, 13, 241-254.
53. Schulte-Korne, G., Deimel, W., Bartling, J. & Remschmidt, H. 1998. Auditory processing and dyslexia: Evidence for a specific speech processing deficit. Neuroreport, 9, 337-340.
54. Soto, H. & Windham, R. 1992. El test SSW. Manual de la versión en español. St. Louis: Auditec.
55. Strouse, A.L., Hall, J.W. & Burger, M.C. 1995. Central auditory processing in Alzheimer's disease. Ear Hear, 16, 230-238.
56. Syntrillium Software Corporation 1999. Cool Edit 2000. Scottsdale, USA: Syntrillium Software Corporation.
57. Tallal, P., Stark, R.E. & Mellis, E.D. 1985. Identification of language impaired children on the basis of rapid perception and production skills. Brain Lang, 25, 314-322.
58. Varney, N.R., Kubu, C.S. & Morrow, L.A. 1998. Dichotic listening performances of patients with chronic exposure to organic solvents. Clin Neuropsychol, 12, 107-112.
59. Wilson, L.K. & Mueller, H.G. 1984. Performance of normal hearing individuals on Auditec filtered speech tests. ASHA, 26, 120.
60. Wilson, R.H. & Strouse, A. 1998. Tonal and Speech Materials for Auditory Perceptual Assessment disc 2.0 [CD]. Mountain Home, USA: VA Medical Centres.
61. Wilson, R.H., Moncrieff, D.W., Townsend, E.A. & Pillion, A.L. 2003. Development of a 500 Hz masking-level difference protocol for clinic use. J Am Acad Audiol, 14, 1-8.