Auditory processing disorders in adults and children: Evaluation of a test battery

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 42, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 391-400

  Neijenhuis, Karin ^a   Snik, Ad ^a   Van den Broek, Paul ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adults; Assessment; Central auditory processing disorders; Children; Evaluation; Factor analysis; Test battery

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; BINAURAL HEARING; CENTRAL AUDITORY PROCESSING DISORDER; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DICHOTIC LISTENING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEARING DISORDER; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING TEST; WHITE NOISE; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0142178208     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14992020309080048     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 1996. Central auditory processing: current research and implications for clinical practice. Am J Audiol, 5(2), 41-54.
2. Baran, J.A. 1996. Audiologic evaluation and management of adults with auditory processing disorders. Semin Speech Lang, 17(3), 233-244.
3. Bellis, T.J. 1999. Subprofiles of central auditory processing disorders. Educational Audiol Rev, Spring, 4-9.
4. Bellis, T.J. & Ferre, J.M. 1999. Multidimensional approach to the differential diagnosis of central auditory processing disorders in children. J Am Acad Audiol, 10(6), 319-328.
5. Cacace, A.T. & McFarland, D.J. 1998. Central auditory processing disorder in school-aged children: a critical review. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 41(2), 355-373.
6. Chermak, G.D. & Musiek, F.E. 1997. Central Auditory Processing Disorders; New Perspectives. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.
7. Chermak, G.D., Traynham, W.A., Seikel, J.A. & Musiek, F.E. 1998. Professional education and assessment practices in central auditory processing. J Am Acad Audiol, 9(6), 452-465.
8. Domitz, D.M. & Schow, R.L. 2000. A new CAPD battery-multiple auditory processing assessment: factor analysis and comparisons with SCAN. Am J Audiol, 9(2), 101-111.
9. Emanuel, D.C. 2002. The auditory processing battery: survey of common practices. J Am Acad Audiol, 13(2), 93-117.
10. Emerson, M.F., Crandall, K.K., Seikel, J.A. & Chermak, G.D. 1997. Observations on the use of SCAN to identify children at risk for central auditory processing disorder. Lang Speech Hear Services Schools, 28(1), 43-49.
11. Ferman, L., Verschuure, J. & Van Zanten, B. 1993. Impaired speech perception in noise in patients with a normal audiogram. Audiology, 32(1), 49-54.
12. Humes, L.E., Coughlin, M. & Talley, L. 1996. Evaluation of the use of a new compact disc for auditory perceptual assessment in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol, 7(6), 419-427.
13. Jerger, J.J. 1998. Controversial issues in central auditory processing disorders. Semin Hear, 19(4), 393-398.
14. Jerger, J. & Musiek, F. 2000. Report of the Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis of Auditory Processing Disorders in School-aged Children. J Am Acad Audiol, 11(9), 467-474.
15. Katz, J. & Smith, P.S. 1991. The staggered spondaic word test. A ten-minute look at the central nervous system through the ears. Ann NY Acad Sci, 620, 233-251.
16. Keith, R.W. 1986. SCAN: A Screening Test for Auditory Processing Disorders. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
17. Keith, R.W. 1995. Development and standardization of SCAN-A: test of auditory processing disorders in adolescents and adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 6(4), 286-292.
18. Keith, R.W. 2000a. SCAN-C: Test for Auditory Processing Disorders in Children, Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
19. Keith, R.W. 2000b. Development and standardization of SCAN-C test for auditory processing disorders in children. J Am Acad Audiol, 11(8), 438-445.
20. Keith, R.W. 2000c. Diagnosing central auditory processing disorders in children. In: R.J. Roeser, M. Valente & H. Hosford-Dunn (eds.) Audiology; Diagnosis. New York: Thieme, pp. 337-353.
21. Keith, R.W., Rudy, J., Donahue, P.A. & Katbamna, B. 1989. Comparison of SCAN results with other auditory and language measures in a clinical population. Ear Hear, 10(6), 382-386.
22. Kramer, S.E., Kapteyn, T.S. & Festen, J.M. 1998. The self-reported handicapping effect of hearing disabilities. Audiology, 37(5), 302-312.
23. McFarland, D.J. & Cacace, A.T. 1995. Modality specificity as a criterion for diagnosing central auditory processing disorders. Am J Audiol, 4(3), 36-48.
24. Middelweerd, M.J., Festen, J.M. & Plomp, R. 1990. Difficulties with speech intelligibility in noise in spite of a normal pure-tone audiogram. Audiology, 29(1), 1-7.
25. Musiek, F.E. 1999. Central auditory tests. Scand Audiol, 28(suppl 51), 33-46.
26. Musiek, F. & Lamb, L. 1994. Central auditory assessment: an overview. In: J. Katz (ed.) Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, pp. 197-211.
27. Neijenhuis, C.A.M., Crul, T., Maassen, B., & Groenen, P. 1999. Validation of a central auditory speech perception test for children. In: B. Maassen & P. Groenen (eds.) Pathologies of Speech and Language: Advances in Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics. London: Whurr, pp. 151-156.
28. Neijenhuis, K., Snik, A., Priester, G., Van Kordenoordt, S. & Van den Broek, P. 2002. Age effects and normative data on a Dutch test battery for auditory processing disorders. Int J Audiol, 41(6), 334-346.
29. Neijenhuis, K.A., Stollman, M.H., Snik, A.F. & Van der Broek, P. 2001. Development of a central auditory test battery for adults. Audiology, 40(2), 69-77.
30. Noffsinger, D., Wilson, R.H. & Musiek, F.E. 1994. Department of Veterans Affairs compact disc recording for auditory perceptual assessment: background and introduction. J Am Acad Audiol, 5(4), 231-235.
31. Ptok, M., Berger, R., von Deuster, C., Gross, M., Lamprecht-Dinnesen, A., et al. 2000. Auditive Verarbeitungs- und Wahrnehmungsstorungen; Konsensus-Statement. HNO, 48(5), 357-360.
32. Sanger, D.D., Keith, R.W. & Maher, B.A. 1987. An assessment technique for children with auditory-language processing problems. J Comun Disord, 20(4), 265-279.
33. Saunders, G.H., Field, D.L. & Haggard, M.P. 1992. A clinical test battery for obscure auditory dysfunction (OAD): development, selection and use of tests. Br J Audiol, 26(1), 33-42.
34. Saunders, G.H. & Haggard, M.P. 1992, The clinical assessment of 'Obscure Auditory Dysfunction' (OAD) 2. Case control analysis of determining factors. Ear Hear, 13(4), 241-254.
35. Schow, R.L. & Chermak, G. 1999. Implications from factor analysis for central auditory processing disorders. Am J Audiol, 8(2), 137-142.
36. Schow, R.L., Seikel, J.A., Chermak, G.D. & Berent, M. 2000. Central auditory processes and test measures: ASHA 1996 revisited. Am J Audiol, 9(2), 63-68.
37. Singer, J., Hurley, R. & Preece, J. 1998, Effectiveness of central auditory processing tests with children. Am J Audiol, 7(2), 73-84.
38. Snik, F.M., Teunissen, B. & Cremers, W.R. 1994. Speech recognition in patients after successful surgery for unilateral congenital ear anomalies. Laryngoscope, 104, 1029-1034.
39. Tillery, K.L., Katz, J. & Keller, WD. 2000. Effects of methylphenidate (Ritalin) on auditory performance in children with attention and auditory processing disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 43(4), 893-901.
40. Van Velzen, E.C.W., Simkens, H.M.F. & Stollman, M.H.P. 1995. The value of central auditory tests in the detection of auditory processing disorders in language impaired children. In: R. Schoonhoven, T. Kapteyn and J. de Laat (eds.) European Conference on Audiology, Leiden: Nederlandse Vereniging voor Audiologie, 392-402.