Central Auditory Processing Assessment

Acta Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica Belgica

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 243-252

  Demanez, L ^a   Demanez, J P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Auditory perceptual disorders; Dichotic listening tests; Perceptual closure; Time factors

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; COGNITION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; HEARING DISORDER; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REVIEW; TASK PERFORMANCE;

AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT DISORDERS; PREVALENCE;

EID: 0348108052     PISSN: 00016497     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. JERGER J. Audiological manifestations of lesions in the auditory nervous system. Laryngoscope, 70: 417-425, 1960.
2. BOCCA E., CALEARO C., CASSINARI V. A new method for testing hearing in temporal lobe tumors. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockholm), 44: 219-221, 1954.
3. BOCCA E., CALEARO C. Central hearing processes. In: JERGER J., ed., Modern Developments in Audiology. Academic Press, New York: 1963.
4. FAIRBANKS G., EVERITT W., JAEGER R. Methods for time or frequency compression-expansion of speech. Trans IRE-PGA, 2: 7-12, 1954.
5. LAFON J.-C. Le Test Phonétique et la Mesure de l'Audition. Editions Centrex, Eindhoven: 1964.
6. MATZKER J. Two new methods for the assessment of central auditory functions in cases of brain diseases. Annals of Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 68: 1155-1197, 1959.
7. HENNESERT D. Intégration de la perception auditive et l'audition alternante. Acta otolaryngol. Belgica, 9: 344-346, 1955.
8. HAUSLER R., COLBURN H. S., MARR E. Sound localization in subjects with impaired hearing. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockholm), Suppl. 400, 1983.
9. CHERMAK G. D., MUSIEK F. E. Central Auditory Processing Disorders. New Perspectives. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego: 1997.
10. MEDWETSKY L. Central auditory processing testing: a battery approach. In: KATZ J., ed., Handbook of Clinical Audiology. 5th ed., Lippincott William & Wilkins, Philadelphia: 510-524, 2002.
11. MICHEL F., PERONNET F., SCHOTT B. A case of cortical deafness: clinical and electrophysiological data. Brain Lang., 10: 367-377, 1980.
12. FREUD S. Zur Auffarung des Aphasien. Eine kritische Studie. Gepzig: 1891.
13. LICHTEIM L. On aphasia. Brain, 7: 433-484, 1885.
14. LECHEVALIER B., LAMBERT J., EUSTACHE F., PLATEL H. Agnosies auditives et syndromes voisins. Etude clinique, cognitive et psychopathologique. Encycl. Méd. Chir., Neurologie. Elsevier SAS, Paris: 1-9, 1999.
15. BELLIS T. J. Central Auditory Processing Disorders. From Science to Practice. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego: 1996.
16. SAUNDERS G. H., HAGGARD M. P. The clinical assessement of obscure auditory dysfunction. Ear Hear., 10: 200-208, 1989.
17. BARAN J. A., MUSIEK F. E. Central auditory disorders. In: LUXON L. M., ed., Textbook of Audiological Medicine. Martin Dunitz, London: 495-511, 2003.
18. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Task Force on Central Auditory Processing Consensus Development. Central auditory processing: current status of research and implications for clinical practice. Am. J. Audiol. 5: 41-54, 1996.
19. JERGER J., MUSIEK F. Report on the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. J. Am. Acad. Audiol., 11: 467-474, 2000.
20. COOPER J. C., GATES G. A. Hearing in the elderly - The Framingham Cohort, 1983-1985. Part II. Prevalence of central auditory disorders. Ear Hear., 12: 304-311, 1991.
21. FISHER L. I. Learning disabilities and auditory processing. In: VAN HATTAM R. J., ed., Administration of Speech Language Services in Schools: A Manual. College-Hiil Press, San Diego: 231-2901, 1985.
22. ANDERSON K. L. Screening instruments for targeting educational risk. In: JOHNSON C. D., BENSON P. V., SEATON J. B., ed., Educational Audiology Handbook. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego: 1997.
23. SMOSKI W. Use of CHAPPS in a children's audiology clinic. Ear Hear., 11: 53S-56S, 1990.
24. LEVINE R., GARDNER J., STUFFLEBEAM S., FULLTERTON B., CARLISLE E., FURST N., ROSEN B., KIANG M. Effects of multiple sclerosis brainstem lesions on sound lateralization and brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Hearing Research, 68: 73-88, 1993.
25. GATES G. A., COBB J. L., LINN R. T., REES T., WOLF P. A., D'AGOSTINO R. B. Central auditory dysfunction, cognitive dysfunction, and dementia in older people. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg., 122: 161-167, 1996.
26. BARAN J. A., MUSIEK F. E. Behavioral assessment of the central auditory nervous system. In: RINTELMANN W., ed., Hearing assessment. Pro-Ed., Austin: 549-602, 1991.
27. OLSEN W. O., NOFFSINGER P. D., KURDZIEL S. A. Speech discrimination in quiet and in white noise by patients with peripheral and central lesions. Acta otolaryngol.(Stockholm), 80: 375-382, 1975.
28. MUSIEK F. E., BARAN J. A., PINHEIRO M. L. Neuroaudiology case studies. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego: 1994.
29. RINTELMANN W. F. Monaural speech tests in the detection of central auditory disorders. In: PINHEIRO M. L., MUSIEK F. E., ed., Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: foundations and clinical correlates. Wiiliams & Wilkins, Baltimore: 173-200, 1985.
30. HELFER K. S., WILBER L. A. Hearing loss, aging, and speech perception in reverberation and noise. J Speech Hear. Research, 33: 149-155, 1990.
31. KEITH R. W. SCAN: a screening test for Auditory Processing Disorders. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio: 1986.
32. KEITH R. W. SCAN-A: a test for auditory processing disorders in adolescents and adults. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio: 1994.
33. CHERRY R. The selective auditory attention test (SAAT). Auditec of St. Louis, St. Louis: 1980.
34. JERGER J., JERGER S. W. Auditory findings in brainstem disorders. Arch. Otolaryngol., 99: 342-349, 1974.
35. BROADBENT D. E. The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. J. Exper. Psychology, 47: 191-196, 1954.
36. KIMURA D. Somme effects of temporal lobe damage on auditory perception. Can. J. Psychol., 15: 157-165, 1961.
37. KIMURA D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Can. J. Psychol., 15: 166-171, 1961.
38. PINHEIRO M. L., MUSIEK F. E. Assessment of Central Auditory Dysfunction: Foundations and Clinical Correlates. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore: 1985.
39. JERGER J., CHMIEL R., ALLEN J., WILSON A. Effects of age and gender on dichotic sentence identification. Ear Hear., 15: 274-286, 1994.
40. SPARKS R., GOODGLASS H., NICKEL B. Ipsilateral versus contralateral extinction in dichotic listening resulting from hemispheric lesions. Cortex, 6: 249-260, 1970.
41. MILNER B., TAYLOR S., SPERRY R. Lateralized suppression of dichotically presented digits after commissural section in man. Science, 161: 184-185, 1968.
42. SPARKS R., GESCHWIND N. Dichotic listening in man after section of neocortical commissures. Cortex, 4: 3-16, 1968.
43. MUSIEK F. E., REEVES A. G., BARAN J. A. Release from central auditory competition in the split-brain patient. Neurology, 35: 983-987, 1985.
44. BARAN J. A., MUSEEK F. E., REEVES A. G. Central auditory function following anterior sectioning of the corpus callosum. Ear Hear., 7: 359-362, 1986.
45. DAMASIO H., DAMASIO A. "Paradoxic" ear extinction in dichotic listening: possible anatomic significance. Neurology, 29: 644-653, 1979.
46. MUSIEK F. E. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: the Dichotic Digits Test revisited. Ear Hear., 4: 79-83, 1983.
47. BERLIN C. I., LOWE-BELL S. S., JANNETTA P. J., KLINE D. G. Central auditory deficits after temporal lobectomy. Arch. Otolaryngol., 96: 4-10, 1972.
48. WEXLER B., HAWLES T. Increasing the power of dichotic methods: the fused rhymed words test. Neuropsychologia, 21: 59-66, 1983.
49. MUSIEK F. E., KURDZIEL-SCHWAN S., KIBBE K. S., GOLLEGLY K. M., BARAN J. A., RINTELMANN W. F. The dichotic rhyme task: results in split-brain patients. Ear Hear, 10: 33-39, 1989.
50. WILLFORD J. A., BURLEIGH J. M. Sentence procedures in central testing. In: KATZ J., ed., Handbook of clinical audiology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore: 256-268, 1994.
51. KATZ J. The use of staggered spondaic words for assessing the integrity of the central auditory system. J. Auditory Research, 2: 327-337, 1962.
52. MUSIEK F. E., KIBBE K., BARAN J. Neuroaudiological results from split-brain patients. Seminars in Hear., 5: 219-229, 1984.
53. BRUNT M. A. The staggered spondaic word test. In: KATZ J., ed., Handbook of clinical audiology, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore: 334-356, 1972.
54. KATZ J., IVEY R. G. Spondaic procedures in central testing. In: KATZ J., ed., Handbook of clinical audiology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore: 239-255, 1994.
55. HIRSH I. J. Auditory perception of temporal order. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 31: 759-767, 1959.
56. GROSE J.H. Gap detection in multiple narrow bands of noise as a function of spectral configuration. J. Acous. Soc. Am., 90: 3061-3068, 1991.
57. HIRSH I. J., SHERRICK C. E. Perceived order in different sense modalities. J. Exper. Psycholog., 62: 423-432, 1961.
58. LACKNER J. R., TEUBER H. L. Alterations in auditory fusion thresholds after cerebral injury in man. Neuropsychologia, 11: 409-415, 1973.
59. EFRON R. The central auditory system and issues related to hemispheric specialization. In: PINHEIRO M. L., MUSIEK F. E., ed., Assessement of central auditory dysfunction: Foundations and clinical correlates. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore: 143-144, 1985.
60. VIEMEISTER N. F. Temporal modulation tranfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 66: 1364-1380, 1979.
61. MUSIEK F. E., PINHEIRO M. L., WILSON D. H. Auditory pattern perception in "split-brain" patients. Arch. Otolaryngol., 106: 610-612, 1980.
62. MUSIEK F. E., PINHEIRO M. L. Frequency patterns in cochlear, brainstem, and cochlear lesions. Audiology, 26: 79-88, 1987.
63. PINHEIRO M. L. Assessment of Central Auditory Dysfunction: Foundations and Clinical Correlates. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore: 1985.
64. SHANNON R. V. Forward masking in patients with cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 88: 741-744, 1990.
65. CRANFORD J. L., STREAM R. W., RYE C. V., SLADE T. L. Detection versus discrimination of brief-duration tones: Findings in patients with temporal lobe damage. Arch. Otolaryngol., 108: 350-356, 1982.
66. EFRON R., CRANDALL P. H. Central auditory processing: Effects of anterior temporal lobectomy. Brain Language, 19: 237-253, 1983.
67. COLAVITA F. B., SZELIGO F. V., ZIMMER S. D. Temporal pattern discrimination in cats with insular-temporal lesions. Brain Rech., 79: 153-156, 1974.
68. MUSIEK F. E., BARAN J. A., PINHEIRO M. L. Duration pattern recognition in normal subjects and patients with cerebral and cortical lesions. Audiology, 29: 304-313, 1990.
69. PICKLES J. O. Physiology of the cerebral auditory system. In: PINHEIRO M. L., MUSIEK F. E., ed., Assessement of central auditory dysfunction: Foundations and clinical correlates. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore: 67-86, 1985.
70. MUSIEK F. E. The evaluation of braistem disorders using ABR and central auditory tests. Monographs in Contemporary Audiology, 4: 1-24, 1983.
71. WELSH L. W., WELSH J. J., HEALY M., COOPER B. Cortical, subcortical, and brainstem dysfunction: A correlation in dyslexic children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 91: 310-315, 1982.
72. SANCHEZ-LONGO L., FORSTER F. Clinical significance of impairments in sound localizations. Neurology, 8: 119-125, 1958.
73. PINHEIRO M. L., TOBIN H. The interaural intensity difference as a diagnostic indicator. Acta otorhinolaryngol. (Stockholm), 71: 326-328, 1971.
74. PINEK B., DUHAMEL J. R., CAVE C., BROUCHON M. Audiospatial deficits in humans: differentials effects associated with left versus right hemisphere parietal damage. Cortex, 25: 175-186, 1989.
75. POIRIER P., LASSONDE M., VILLEMURE J. G., GEOFFROY G. LEPORE F. Sound localization in hemispherectomized patients. Neuropsychologia, 32: 541-553, 1994.
76. LICKUDER J. C. R. The influence of interaural phase relations upon the masking of speech by white noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 20: 150-159, 1948.
77. HIRSH I. J. The influence of interaural phase on interaural summation and inhibition. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 20: 536-544, 1948.
78. NOFFSINGER D., SCHAEFER A. B., MARTINEZ C. D. Behavioral and objective estimates of auditory brainstem integrity. Seminars in Hearing, 5: 337-349, 1984.
79. LYNN G. E., GILROY J., TAYLOR P. C., LEISER L. P. Binaural masking level differences in neurological disorders. Arch. Otolaryngol., 107: 357-362, 1981.
80. LEVINE R. A., GARDNER J. C., FULLERTON B. C., STUFFELBEAM S. M., FURST M., ROSEN B. R. Multiple sclerosis lesions of the auditory pons are not silent. Brain, 117: 1127-1141, 1994.
81. NOFFSINGER D., MARTINEZ C., SCHAEFER A. Auditory brainstem responses and masking level differences from persons with brainstem lesions. Scand. Audiol., 15: 81-93, 1982.