Central Auditory Processing Assessment: A French-speaking battery

Acta Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica Belgica

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 275-290

  Demanez, L ^a   Dony Closon, B ^a   Lhonneux Ledoux, F ^a   Demanez, J P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Auditory closure; Auditory processing disorders diagnosis; Binaural interaction; Dichotic test; Involution; Maturation; Temporal processing

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AUDIOLOGY; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DICHOTIC LISTENING; FRANCE; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMERICAN SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOCIATION; BELGIUM; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; FEMALE; HEARING TESTS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT DISORDERS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; SPEECH PERCEPTION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0347752396     PISSN: 00016497     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. BOCCA E., CALEARO C., CASSINARI V. A new method for testing hearing in temporal lobe tumors. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockholm), 44: 219-221, 1954.
2. CHERMAK G. D., MUSIEK F. E. Central Auditory Processing Disorders. New Perspectives. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego: 1997.
3. BELLIS T. J. Central Auditory Processing Disorders. From Science to Practice. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego: 1996.
4. MEDWETSKY L. Central auditory processing testing: a battery approach. In: KATZ J., ed., Handbook of Clinical Audiology. 5th ed., Lippincott William & Wilkins, Philadelphia: 510-524, 2002.
5. MUSIEK F. E., BARAN J. A., PINHEIRO M. L. Neuroaudiology case studies. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego: 1994.
6. KEITH R. W. Central auditory assessment. In: HUGHES G. B., PENSAK M. L., ed., Clinical Otology. Thieme, New York: 101-109, 1997.
7. LAFON J.-C. Le Test Phonétique et la Mesure de l'Audition. Editions Centrex, Eindhoven: 1964.
8. ELIOT M. M. Le test dichotique. J. Français d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngol., 33: 97-104, 1984.
9. HUBLET C. Apport du test dichotique en neurophysiologie clinique. Otica, 13: 2-17, 1989.
10. ELBAZ P., LECA F., ELBAZ E. F., MILLER P. Vocals in silence and noise. A simple test of resistance of intelligibility in noisy environment. Ann. Otolaryngol. Chir. Cervicofac., 109: 373-385, 1992.
11. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Task Force on Central Auditory Processing Consensus Development. Central auditory processing: current status of research and implications for clinical practice. Am. J. Audiol., 5: 41-54, 1996.
12. EMANUEL D. C. The auditory processing battery: survey of common practises. Journ. Amer. Acad. Audiol., 13: 93-117, 2002.
13. GRIFFITHS T. D., DEAN J. L., WOODS X., REES A., GREEN G. G. R. The Newcastle Auditory Battery (NAB): a temporal and spatial test battery for use on individual naïve subjects. Hear Res., 154: 165-169, 2001.
14. FAIRBANKS G., EVERITT W., JAEGER R. Methods for time or frequency compression-expansion of speech. Trans IRE-PGA, 2: 7-12, 1954.
15. WILSON R. H., PREECE J. P., SALAMON D. L., SPERRY J. L., BORNSTEIN S. P. Effects of time compression plus reverberation on the intelligibility of the Northwestern University Auditory test No.6. J. Amer. Acad. Audiol., 5: 269-277, 1994.
16. JERGER J., JERGER S. W. Auditory findings in brainstem disorders. Arch. Otolaryngol., 99: 342-349, 1974.
17. OLSEN W. O., NOFFSINGER P. D., KURDZIEL S. A. Speech discrimination in quiet and in white noise by patients with peripheral and central lesions. Acta otolaryngol. (Stockholm), 80: 375-382, 1975.
18. MUELLER H. G., BRIGHT K. E. Monosyllabic procedures in central testing. In: J. KATZ, ed., Handbook of clinical audiology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore: 4th ed., 222-238, 1994.
19. BARRENÄS M. L., WIKSTRÖM I. The influence of hearing and age on speech recognition scores in noise in audiological patients and in the general population. Ear Hearing, 21: 569-577, 2000.
20. JERGER J., CHMIEL R., ALLEN J., WILSON A. Effects of age and gender on dichotic sentence identification. Ear Hearing, 15: 274-286, 1994.
21. RODRIGUEZ G. P., DISARNO N. J., HARDIMAN C. J. Central auditory processing in normal elderly adults. Audiology, 29: 85-92, 1990.
22. SNEPPE R., DEGGOUJ N., VAN DEN EECKHAUT J. GERSDORFF M. L'intelligibilité de la parole dans le bruit: résultats sur une population d'adultes, adolescents et enfants. Revue de Laryngologie, 115: 39-44, 1994.
23. KIMURA D. Somme effects of temporal lobe damage on auditory perception. Can. J. Psychol., 15: 157-165, 1961.
24. KIMURA D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Can. J. Psychol., 15: 166-171, 1961.
25. WILLFORD J. A., BURLEIGH J. M. Sentence procedures in central testing. In: KATZ J., ed., Handbook of clinical audiology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore: 256-268, 1994.
26. ARMITAGE P., BERRY G. Statistical methods in medical research. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxfgord, 1987.
27. PINHEIRO M. L., MUSIEK F. E. Assessment of Central Auditory Dysfunction: Foundations and Clinical Correlates. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore: 1985.
28. PTACEK P. H., PINHEIRO M. L. Pattern reversal in auditory perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 49: 493-498, 1971.
29. PINHEIRO M. L., MUSIEK F. E. Sequencing and temporal ordering in the auditory system. In: PINHEIRO M. L. & MUSIEK F. E., ed., Assessment of Central Auditory Dysfunction: Foundations and Clinical Correlates. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore: 219-238, 1985.
30. Tonal and speech materials for auditory perceptual assessment (Disc 2, 0). Auditory research laboratories. Veterans' Administration Medical Centers. Mountain Home, Tennessee and West Los Angeles, California, 1992.
31. NOFFSINGER D., SCHAEFER A. B., MARTINEZ C. D. Behavioral and objective estimates of auditory brainstem integrity. Seminars in Hearing, 5: 337-349, 1984.
32. LYNN G. E., GILROY J., TAYLOR P. C., LEISER L. P. Binaural masking level differences in neurological disorders. Arch. Otolaryngol., 107: 357-362, 1981.