Relationships among foraging variables, phylogeny, and foraging modes, with new data for nine north American lizard species

Herpetologica

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 250-259

  Cooper Jr , William E ^a   Vitt, Laurie J ^b   Caldwell, Janalee P ^b   Fox, Stanley F ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY PURDUE UNIVERSITY FORT WAYNE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^c OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Foraging behavior; Foraging mode; Foraging speed; Lizard; Squamata

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; CORRELATION; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; LIZARD; MOVEMENT; PHYLOGENY; VELOCITY;

NORTH AMERICA;

IGUANIA; SQUAMATA;

EID: 33751555598     PISSN: 00180831     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1655/04-82.1     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ANDERSON, R. A. 1993. An analysis of foraging in the lizard, Cnemidophorus tigris. Pp. 83-116. In J. W. Wright and L. J. Vitt (Eds.), Biology of Whiptail Lizards (Genus Cnemidophorus). Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, Norman, Oklahoma, U.S.A.
2. ARNOLD, E. N. 1990. Why do morphological phylogenies vary in quality? An investigation based on the comparative history of lizard clades. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 240:135-172.
3. BRANCH, B. 1998. Field Guide to Snakes and other Reptiles of Southern Africa. Ralph Curtis Books, Sanibel Island, Florida, U.S.A.
4. BUTLER, M. A. In press. Foraging mode of an old-world chameleon, Brdypodion pumilum: a sit-and-wait or active forager? Biological Journal of the Linnaen Society.
5. CONANT, R., AND J. T. COLLINS. 1998. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians: Eastern/Central North America. Houghton Mifflin, New York, New York, U.S.A.
6. COOPER, W. E., JR. 1994a. Chemical discrimination by tongue-flicking in lizards: a review with hypotheses on its origin and its ecological and phylogenetic relationships. Journal of Chemical Ecology 20:439-487.
7. -. 1994b. Prey chemical discrimination, foraging mode, and phylogeny. Pp. 95-116. In L. J. Vitt and E. R. Pianka (Eds.), Lizard Ecology: Historical and Experimental Perspectives. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, U.S.A.
8. -. 1995. Foraging mode, prey chemical discrimination, and phylogeny in lizards. Animal Behaviour 50:973-985.
9. -. 1997. Correlated evolution of prey chemical discrimination with foraging, lingual morphology, and vomeronasal chemoreceptor abundance in lizards. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41:257-265.
10. COOPER, W. E., JR., M. J. WHITING, AND J. H. VAN WYK. 1997. Foraging modes of cordyliform lizards. South African Journal of Zoology 32:9-13.
11. COOPER, W. E., JR., AND M. J. WHITING. 1999. Foraging modes in lacertid lizards from southern Africa. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:299-311.
12. COOPER, W. E., JR., L. J. VITT, J. P. CALDWELL, AND S. F. FOX. 2001. Foraging modes of some American lizards: relationships among measurement variables and discreteness of modes. Herpetologica 57:65-76.
13. COOPER, W. E., JR., AND L. J. VITT. 2002. Distribution, extent, and evolution of plant consumption by lizards. Journal of Zoology 257:487-517.
14. ESTES, R., K. DE QUEIROZ, AND J. GAUTHIER. 1988. Phylogenetic relationships within Squamata. Pp. 119-281. In R. Estes and G. Pregill (Eds.), Phylogenetic Relationships of the Lizard Families. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, U.S.A.
15. EVANS, L. T. 1961. Structure as related to behavior in the organization of populations of reptiles. Pp. 148-178. In W. F. Blair (Ed.), Vertebrate Speciation. University of Texas Press, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
16. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125:1-15.
17. FLORES-VILLELA, O., K. M. KJER, M. BENABIB, AND J. W. J. SITES. 2000. Multiple data sets, congruence, and hypothesis testing for the phylogeny of basal groups of the lizard Genus Sceloporus (Squamata, Phrynosomatidae). Systematic Biology 49:713-739.
18. FU, J. 2000. Toward the phylogeny of the family Lacertidae - why 4708 base pairs of mtDNA sequences cannot draw the picture. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 71:203-217.
19. GARLAND, T., JR. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of lizard endurance capacity in relation to body size and body temperature. Pp. 237-259. In L. J. Vitt and E. R. Pianka (Eds.), Lazard Ecology: Historical and Experimental Perspectives. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, U.S.A.
20. HUEY, R. B., AND E. R. PIANKA. 1981. Ecological consequences of foraging mode. Ecology 62:991-999.
21. HUEY, R. B., AND A. F. BENNETT. 1986. A comparative approach to field and laboratory studies in evolutionary biology. Pp. 82-98. In M. E. Feder and G. V. Lauder (Eds.), Predator-Prey Relationships: Perspectives and Approaches from the Study of Lower Vertebrates. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
22. MCLAUCHLIN, R. L. 1989. Search modes of birds and lizards: evidence for alternative movement patterns. American Naturalist 133:654-670.
23. PERRY, G. 1999. The evolution of search modes: ecological versus phylogenetic perspectives. American Naturalist 153:99-109.
24. PERRY, G. In press. Foraging behavior in lizards. In S. Reilly, L. McBrayer, and D. B. Miles (Eds.), Foraging Behavior in Lizards. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
25. PERRY, G., I. LAMPL, A. LERNER, D. ROTHENSTEIN, E. SHANI, N. SIVAN, AND Y. L. WERNER. 1990. Foraging mode in lacertid lizards: variation and correlates. Amphibia-Reptilia 11:373-384.
26. PIETRUSZKA, R. D. 1986. Search tactics of desert lizards: how polarized are they? Animal Behaviour 34:1742-1758.
27. POUGH, F. H. 1973. Lizard energetics and diet. Ecology 54:837-644.
28. REEDER, T. W. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships among phrynosomatid lizards as inferred from mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences: substitutional bias and information content of transitions relative to transversions. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 4:203-222.
29. REEDER, T. W., AND J. J. WIENS. 1996. Evolution of the lizard family Phrynosomatidae as inferred from diverse types of data. Herpetological Monographs 10:43-84.
30. REEDER, T. W., C. J. COLE, AND H. C. DESSAUER. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of whiptail lizards of the genus Cnemidophorus (Squamata: Teiidae): a test of monophyly, reevaluation of karyotypic evolution, and review of hybrid origins. American Museum Novitates 3365:1-61.
31. REGAL, P. J. 1978. Behavioral differences between reptiles and mammals: an analysis of activity and mental capabilities. Pp. 183-202. in N. Greenberg (Ed.), Behavior and Neurology of Lizards. National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, Maryland, U.S.A.
32. SCHOENER, T. W. 1971. Theory of feeding strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2:369-404.
33. SCHULTE, J. A., II., J. R. MACEY, A. LARSON, AND T. J. PAPENFUSS. 1998. Molecular tests of phylogenetic taxonomies: a general procedure and example using four subfamilies of the lizard family Iguanidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10:367-376.
34. STAMPS, J. A. 1977. Social behavior and spacing patterns in lizards. Pp. 265-334. In C. Cans and D. W. Tinkle (Eds.), Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 7. Ecology and Behaviour A. Academic Press, London, U.K.
35. STEBBINS, R. C. 2003. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians, 3rd ed. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
36. VAN DAMME, R., AND B. VANHOOYDONCK. 2001. Origins of interspecific variation in lizard sprint capacity. Functional Ecology 15:186-202.
37. VITT, L. J., AND J. D. CONGDON. 1978. Body shape, reproductive effort, and relative clutch mass in lizards: resolution of a paradox. American Naturalist 112: 595-608.
38. VITT, L. J., P. A. ZANI, J. P. CALDWELL, AND R. D. DURTSCHE. 1993. Ecology of the whiptail lizard Cnemidophorus deppii on a tropical beach. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71:2391-2400.
39. VITT, L. J., E. R. PIANKA, W. E. COOPER, JR., AND K. SCHWENK. 2003. History and the global ecology of squamate reptiles. American Naturalist 162:44-60.
40. WIENS, J. J., AND T. W. REEDER. 1997. Phylogeny of the spiny lizards (Sceloporus) based on molecular and morphological evidence. Herpetological Monographs 11:1-101.
41. WRIGHT, J. W. 1992. Evolution of the lizards of the genus Cnemidophorus. Pp. 27-81. In J. W. Wright and L. J. Vitt (Eds.), Biology of Whiptail Lizards (genus Cnemidophorus). Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, Norman, Oklahoma, U.S.A.
42. ZAR, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, U.S.A.