Foraging modes of cordyliform lizards

South African Journal of Zoology

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 9-13

  Cooper Jr , William E ^a,b   Whiting, Martin J ^a,c   Van Wyk, Johannes H ^a  

^a STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY FORT WAYNE   (United States)

^c Transvaal Museum   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2642662853     PISSN: 02541858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02541858.1997.11448420     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ANDERSON, R.A. & KARASOV, W.H. 1988. Energetics of the lizard Cnemidophorus tigris and life history consequences of food-acquisition mode. Ecol. Monogr. 58: 79-110.
2. AVERY, R.A., MUELLER, C.F., JONES, S.M. SMITH, J.A. & BOND, D.J. 1987. The movement patterns of European lacertid lizards: a comparative study. J. Zool. (Lond.) 211: 324-329.
3. BRANCH, B. 1988. Field guide to the snakes and other reptiles of southern Africa. Ralph Curtis Books, Sanibel Island, Florida.
4. COOPER, W.E., JR. 1994. Prey chemical discrimination, foraging mode, and phylogeny, In: Lizard ecology: historical and experimental perspectives, (eds.) L.J. Vitt & E.R. Pianka. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
5. COOPER, W.E., JR. 1995. Foraging mode, prey chemical discrimination, and phylogeny in lizards. Anim. Behav. 50: 973-985.
6. ESTES, R., DE QUEIROZ, K. & GAUTHIER, J. 1988. Phylogenetic relationships within Squamata. In: Phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families, (eds.) R. Estes & G. Pregill. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
7. HUEY, R.B. & PIANKA, E.R. 1981. Ecological consequences of foraging mode. Ecology 62: 991-999.
8. LANG, M. 1991. Generic relationships within the Cordyliformes (Reptilia: Squamata). Bull. Inst. r. Sci. nut. Belg. 61: 121-188.
9. MACARTHUR, R. & PIANKA, E.R. 1966. On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am. Nat. 100: 603-609.
10. MADDISON, W.P. & MADDISON, D.R. 1992. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 3.01. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
11. MAGNUSSON, W.E., JUNQUEIRA DE PAIVA, L., MOREIRA DE ROCHA, R., FRANKE, C.R., KASPER, L.A. & LIMA, A.P. 1985. The correlates of foraging mode in a community of Brazilian lizards. Herpetologica 41: 324-332.
12. MCLAUGHLIN, R.L. 1989. Search modes of birds and lizards: evidence for alternate movement patterns. Am. Nat. 133: 654-670.
13. PERRY, G. 1995. The evolutionary ecology of lizard foraging: a comparative study. Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas, Austin, pp. 1-304.
14. PERRY, G., LAMPL, I., LERNER, A., ROTHENSTEIN, D., SHANI, E., SIVAN, N. & WERNER, Y.L. 1990. Foraging mode in lacertid lizards: variation and correlates. Amphibia-Reptilia 11: 373-384.
15. PIETRUSZKA, R.D. 1986. Search tactics of desert lizards: how polarized are they? Anim. Behav. 34: 1742-1758.
16. REGAL, P.J. 1978. Behavioral differences between reptiles and mammals: an analysis of activity and mental capabilities. In: Behavior and neurology of lizards, (eds.) N. Greenberg & P. D. Maclean. NIMH, Rockville, Maryland.
17. VITT, L.J. 1983. Tail loss in lizards: the significance of foraging and predator escape modes. Herpetologica 39: 151-162.
18. VITT, L.J. & CONGDON, J.D. 1978. Body shape, reproductive effort, and relative clutch mass in lizards: resolution of a paradox. Am. Nat. 112: 595-608.
19. VITT, L.J. & PRICE, H.J. 1982. Ecological and evolutionary determinants of relative clutch mass in lizards. Herpetologica 38: 237-255.
20. ZAR, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.