Reduced mating vigor in selection lines of the butterfly Bicyclus anynana

Journal of Insect Behavior

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 657-668

  Fischer, Klaus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Artificial selection; Correlated response; Inadvertent selection; Inbreeding; Mating success

Indexed keywords

BICYCLUS ANYNANA;

EID: 33751351103     PISSN: 08927553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10905-006-9057-9     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection, University Press, Princeton.
2. Armbruster, P., Hutchinson, R. A., and Linvell, T. (2000). Equivalent inbreeding depression under laboratory and field conditions in a tree-hole-breeding mosquito. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 1939-1945.
3. Brakefield, P. M. (1997). Phenotypic plasticity and fluctuating asymmetry as responses to environmental stress in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. In Bijlsma, R. R., and Loeschke, V. (eds.), Environmental stress: Adaptation and Evolution, Birkhäuser, Basel, pp. 65-78.
4. Brakefield, P. M. (2003). Artificial selection and the development of ecologically relevant phenotypes. Ecology 84: 1661-1671.
5. Brakefield, P. M., El Filali, E., Van Der Laan, R., Breuker, C. J., and Saccheri, I. J. (2001). Effective population size, reproductive success and sperm competition in the butterfly, Bicyclus anynana, in captivity. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 148-156.
6. Brakefield, P. M., and Reitsma, N. (1991). Phenotypic plasticity, seasonal climate and the population biology of Bicyclus butterflies (Satyridae) in Malawi. Ecol. Entomol. 16: 291-303.
7. Breuker, C. J., and Brakefield, P. M. (2002). Female choice depends on size but not symmetry of dorsal eyespots in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 1233-1239.
8. Cockburn, A. (1992). An introduction to evolutionary ecology, Blackwell, Oxford.
9. Conner, J. K. (2003). Artificial selection: A powerful tool for ecologists. Ecology 84: 1650-1660.
10. DeRose, M. A., and Roff, D. A. (1999). A comparison of inbreeding depression in life-history and morphological traits in animals. Evolution 53: 1288-1292.
11. Etterson, J. R., and Shaw, R. G. (2001). Constraints to adaptive evolution in response to global warming. Science 294: 151-154.
12. Falconer, D. S., and Mckay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics, 2nd edn., Longman Scientific, New York.
13. Ferkau, C., and Fischer, K. (2006). Costs of reproduction in male Bicyclus anynana and Pieris napi butterflies: Effects of mating history and food limitation. Ethology 112: 1117-1127.
14. Fischer, K., Bot, A. N. M., Brakefield, P. M., and Zwaan, B. J. (2006). Do mothers producing large offspring have to sacrifice fecundity? J. Evol. Biol. 19: 380-391.
15. Haikola, S., Singer, M. C., and Pen, I. (2004). Has inbreeding depression led to avoidance of sib mating in the Glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia)? Evol. Ecol. 18: 113-120.
16. Harshman, L. G., and Hoffmann, A. A. (2000). Laboratory selection experiments using Drosophila: What do they really tell us? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 32-36.
17. Huntingford, F. A., and Turner, A. K. (1987). Animal Conflict, Chapman and Hall, New York.
18. Joron, M., and Brakefield, P. M. (2003). Captivity masks inbreeding effects on male mating success in butterflies. Nature 424: 191-194.
19. Keller, L. F., Arcese, P., Smith, J. N. M., Hochachka, W. M., and Stearns, S. C. (1994). Selection against inbred song sparrows during a natural population bottleneck. Nature 372: 356-357.
20. Kemp, D. J., and Wiklund, C. (2001). Fighting without weaponry: A review of male-male contest competition in butterflies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49: 429-442.
21. Kemp, D. J., and Alcock, J. (2004). Lifetime resource utilization, flight physiology, and the evolution of contest competition in territorial insects. Am. Nat. 162: 290-301.
22. Larsen, T. B. (1991). The butterflies of Kenya, University Press, Oxford.
23. Lyytinen, A., Brakefield, P. M., Lindström, L., and Mappes, J. (2004). Does predation maintain eyespot plasticity in Bicyclus anynana? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271: 279-283.
24. Marden, J. H., and Waage, J. K. (1990). Escalated damselfly territorial contests are energetic wars of attrition. Anim. Behav. 39: 954-959.
25. Martin, O. Y., and Hosken, D. J. (2003). The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature 423: 979-982.
26. Maynard-Smith, J. (1956). Fertility, mating behaviour, and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura. J. Genet. 54: 261-279.
27. Miller, P. S., Glasner, J., and Hedrick, P. W. (1993). Inbreeding depression and male-mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 88: 29-36.
28. Partridge, L., Prowse, N., and Pignatelli, P. (1999). Another set of responses and correlated responses to selection on age at reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 255-261.
29. Plaistow, S., and Siva-Jothy, M. T. (1996). Energetic constraints and male mate-securing tactics in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens xanthostoma (Charpentier). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 1233-1238.
30. Roff, D. A., and DeRose, M. A. (2001). The evolution of trade-offs: Effects of inbreeding on fecundity relationships in the cricket Gryllus firmus. Evolution 55: 111-121.
31. Roper, C., Pignatelli, P., and Partridge, L. (1996). Evolutionary responses of Drosophila melanogaster life history to differences in larval density. J. Evol. Biol. 9: 609-622.
32. Rose, M. R., Chippindale, A. K., and Nusbaum, T. J. (1996). Laboratory evolution: The experimental wonderland and the Cheshire cat syndrome. In Rose, M. R., and Lauder, G. V. (eds.), Adaptation, Academic Press, New York, pp. 221-241.
33. Rutowski, R. L. (1985). Evidence for mate choice in a Sulphur butterfly (Colias eurytheme). Zeitschr. Tierpsychologie 70: 103-114.
34. Saccheri, I., Brakefield, P. M., and Nichols, R. A. (1996). Severe inbreeding depression and rapid fitness rebound in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana (Satyridae). Evolution 50: 2000-2013.
35. Saccheri, I., Kuussaari, M., Kankare, M., Vikman, P., Fortelius, W., and Hanski, I. (1998). Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392: 491-494.
36. Savalli, U. M. (2001). Sexual selection. In Fox, C. W., Roff, D. A., and Fairbairn, D. J. (eds.), Evolutionary ecology, University Press, Oxford, pp. 207-221.
37. Scion Corporation (2000). Scion Image 4.02. Scion Corporation, Maryland.
38. Thomas, C. D., Bodsworth, E. J., Wilson, R. J., Simmons, A. D., Davies, Z. G., Musche, M., and Conradt, L. (2001). Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. Nature 411: 577-591.
39. Tregenza, T. (2003). Evolution - The battle between the sexes. Nature 423: 929-930.
40. Van't Hof, A. E., Zwaan, B. J., Saccheri, I. J., Daly, D., Bot, A. N. M., and Brakefield, P. M. (2005). Characterization of 28 microsatellite loci for the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5: 169-172.
41. Zamudio, K. R., Huey, R. B., and Crill, W. D. (1995). Bigger isn't always better: Body size, developmental and parental temperature and male territorial success in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 49: 671-677.