Ethically involving students in faculty research

Nurse Education in Practice

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 397-403

  Ferguson, Linda M ^a   Myrick, Flo ^b   Yonge, Olive ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Nursing education research; Nursing students; Participants; Research ethics

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751312486     PISSN: 14715953     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2006.07.016     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ashcroft R.E. Making sense of dignity. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2005) 679-682
2. Bell L., and Nutt L. Divided loyalties, divided expectations: research ethics, professional and occupational responsibilities. In: Mauthner M., Birch M., Jessop J., and Miller T. (Eds). Ethics in Qualitative Research (1999), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 70-90
3. Bowman L.L., and Waite B.W. Volunteering in research: student satisfaction and educational benefits. Teaching of Psychology 30 2 (2003) 102-106
4. Burns N., and Grove S.K. The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique, & Utilization. fourth ed. (2001), Saunders, Philadelphia
5. Canadian Nurses Association [CNA], 2002. Ethical Research Guidelines for Registered Nurses. Author, Ottawa, ON.
6. Clark E., and McCann T.V. Researching students: an ethical dilemma. Nurse Researcher 12 (2005) 42-51
7. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Protection from Research Risks, Government of United States of America [45 CFR 46], 2001. Title 45; Part 46: Protection of human subjects. Code of Federal Regulations. Washington DC: Author.
8. Diekelmann N., and Ironside P.M. Developing a science of nursing education: innovation with research. Journal of Nursing Education 41 9 (2002) 379-380
9. Dyregrov K. Bereaved parents' experiences of research participation. Social Science & Medicine 58 (2004) 391-400
10. Ebbs C.A. Qualitative research inquiry: issues of power and ethics. Education 117 2 (1996) 217-222
11. Edwards M., and Chalmers K. Double agency in clinical research. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 34 1 (2002) 131-142
12. Ferguson L.M., and Day R.A. Evidence-based nursing education: myth or reality?. Journal of Nursing Education 44 3 (2005) 107-115
13. Ferrari J.R., and McGowan S. Using exam bonus points as incentive for research participation. Teaching of Psychology 29 1 (2002) 29-32
14. Helgesson G., Ludvigsson J., and Gustafsson Stolt U. How to handle informed consent in longitudinal studies when participants have a limited understanding of the study. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2005) 670-673
15. Henry R.B., and Wright D.E. When do medical students become human subjects of research?: the case of program evaluation. Academic Medicine 76 9 (2001) 871-875
16. Horner J.S. Retreat from Nuremberg: can we prevent unethical medical research?. Public Health 113 (1999) 205-210
17. Hudson J.M., and Bruckman A. "Go away": participant objections to being studied and the ethics of chatroom research. Information Society 20 (2004) 127-139
18. Kavanaugh K., and Ayres L. "Not as bad as it could have been": assessing and mitigating harm during research interviews on sensitive topics. Research in Nursing & Health 21 (1998) 91-97
19. Lemmens T., and Singer P. Bioethics for clinicians: conflicts of interest in research, education, and patient care. Canadian Medical Association Journal 159 8 (1998) 960-965
20. Levine R.J. Clinical trials and physicians as double agents. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 65 (1992) 65-74
21. Medical Research Council of Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, & Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [TCPS], 2003. Tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans, Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa.
22. Miller F.G., Rosenstein D.L., and DeRenzo E.G. Professional integrity in clinical research. Journal of the American Medical Association 280 16 (1998) 1449-1454
23. Moreno J.D. Convenient and captive populations. In: Kahn J.P., Mastroianni A.C., and Sugarman J. (Eds). Beyond Consent: Seeking Justice in Research (1998), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK 111-130
24. Moreno J., Caplan A.L., and Wolpe P.R. Updating protections for human subjects involved in research. Journal of the American Medical Association 280 22 (1999) 1951-1958
25. Namei S.K., O'Brien King M., Byrne M., and Proffitt C. The ethics of role conflict in research. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing 25 5 (1998) 326-330
26. National League for Nursing [NLN], 2002. Position statement: funding for nursing education research. National League for Nursing. (accessed 20.06.6).
27. Newell R. Research and its relationship to nurse education: focus and capacity. Nurse Education Today 22 (2002) 278-284
28. Orb A., Eisenhauer L., and Wynaden D. Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 33 1 (2001) 93-96
29. Roberts L.W., Geppert C., Connor R., Nguyen K., and Warner T.D. An invitation for medical educators to focus on ethical and policy issues in research and scholarly practice. Academic Medicine 76 9 (2001) 876-885
30. Schmitt M.H. It's time to revalue nursing education research (Editorial). Research in Nursing and Health 25 (2002) 423-424
31. Schuklenk U. Protecting the vulnerable: testing times for clinical research ethics. Social Sciences & Medicine 51 (2000) 969-977
32. Shaw S., and Barrett G. Research governance: regulating risk and reducing harm?. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 99 (2006) 14-19
33. Stevens K., and Valiga T.M. Formulating priorities for research in nursing education: a consensus-building approach. Nursing & Health Care Perspectives 20 3 (1999) 167-169
34. Tomkowiak J.M., and Gunderson A.J. To IRB or not to IRB. Academic Medicine 79 7 (2004) 628-632