Prediction of Biological Activity for High-Throughput Screening Using Binary Kernel Discrimination

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 41, Issue 3-6, 2001, Pages 1295-1300

  Harper, Gavin ^a   Bradshaw, John ^a,c   Gittins, John C ^b   Green, Darren V S ^a   Leach, Andrew R ^a  

^a GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c Sheraton House   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENZYME INHIBITION; NEURAL NETWORKS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCREENING;

BINARY KERNEL DISCRIMINATION;

DRUG PRODUCTS;

ENZYME INHIBITOR; MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITOR;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; ENZYME INHIBITORS; MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITORS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 0035438388     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci000397q     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Free, S. M.; Wilson, J. W. A mathematical contribution to structure-activity studies. J. Med. Chem. 1964, 7, 395-399.
2. Hansch, C. A quantitative approach to biochemical structure-activity relationships. Acc. Chem. Res. 1969, 2, 232-239.
3. Wold, S. In Systems under Indirect Observation - Volume II; Joreskog, K.-G., Wold, H., Eds.; North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982.
4. Burden, F. R. Using artificial neural networks to predict biological activity from simple molecular structural considerations. Quant. Struct.-Ad. Relat. 1996, 15, 7-11.
5. Sadowski, J.; Kubinyi, H. A scoring scheme for discriminating between drugs and nondrugs. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3325-3329.
6. King, R. D.; Srinivasan, A. The discovery of indicator variables for QSAR using inductive logic programming. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 571-580.
7. Bolis, G.; Di Pace, L.; Fabrocini, F. A machine learning approach to computer-aided molecular design. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1991, 5, 617-628.
8. Cybenko, G. Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Mathematics of Control Signals and Systems 1989, 2, 303-314.
9. Cramer, R. D., III.; Redl, G.; Berkoff, C. E.. Substructural analysis. A novel approach to the problem of drug design. J. Med. Chem. 1974, 17, 7, 533-535.
10. Ormerod, A.; Willett, P.; Bawden, D. Comparison of fragment weighting schemes for substructural analysis. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1989, 8, 115-129.
11. Gao, H.; Williams, C.; Labute, P.; Bajorath, J. Binary quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis of estrogen receptor ligands. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 164-168.
12. Rusinko, A., III.; Farmen, M. W.; Lambert, C. G.; Brown, P. L.; Young, S. S. Analysis of a large structure/biology activity data set using recursive partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1017-1026.
13. Cho, J. C.; Shen, F.; Hermsmeier, M. A. Binary formal inference-based recursive modeling using multiple atom and physicochemical property class pair and torsion descriptors as decision criteria. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 668-680.
14. Constans, P.; Hirst, J. D. Nonparametric regression applied to quantitative structure-activity relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 452-459.
15. Carhart, R. E.; Smith, D. H.; Venkataraghavan, R. Atom pairs as molecular features in structure-activity studies: definition and applications. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1985, 25, 64-73.
16. Nilakantan, R.; Baumann, N.; Dixon, J. S.; Venkataraghavan, R. Topological torsions: a new molecular descriptor for SAR applications. Comparison with other descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1987, 27, 82-85.
17. Scott, D. W. Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization; John Wiley: New York, 1992.
18. Simonoff, J. S. Smoothing Methods in Statistics; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1996.
19. Aitchison, J.; Aitken, C. G. G. Multivariate binary discrimination by the kernel method. Biometrika. 1976, 63, 413-420.
20. Tutz, G. An alternative choice of smoothing for kernel-based density estimates in discrete discriminant analysis. Biometrika. 1986, 73, 405-411.
21. Tutz, G. On cross-validation for discrete kernel estimates in discrimination. Commun. Statistics - Theory Methods 1989, 18, 4145-4162.
22. Harper, G. The Selection of Compounds for Screening in Pharmaceutical Research; D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford, 1999.
23. SNNS: Stuttgart Neural Network Simulator; Version 4.2, University of Stuttgart, 1998.
24. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 572-584.
25. Gittins, J. C.; Harper, G. Bounds on the Performance of a Greedy Algorithm for Probabilities. To appear in Math. Operations Res..