The hidden component of size in two-dimensional fragment descriptors: Side effects on sampling in bioactive libraries

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 42, Issue 15, 1999, Pages 2887-2900

  Dixon, Steven L ^a   Koehler, Ryan T ^a  

^a Telik Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR SIZE;

DRUG DESIGN; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SUBJECT HEADINGS;

EID: 0033615007     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm980708c     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Johnson, M.; Maggiora, G. M. Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity; Wiley: New York, 1990.
2. Martin, Y. C.; Brown, R. D.; Bures, M. G. Quantifying Diversity. In Combinatorial Chemistry and Molecular Diversity; Kerwin, J. F., Gordon, E. M., Eds; Wiley: New York, 1998; pp 369-385.
3. Ferguson, A. M.; Patterson, D. E.; Garr, C; Underiner, T. Designing Chemical Libraries for Lead Discovery. J. Biomol. Screening 1996, 1, 65-73.
4. Martin, E. J.; Blaney, J. M.; Siani, M. A.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Wong, A. K.; Moos, W. H. Measuring Diversity: Experimental Design of Combinatorial Libraries for Drug Discovery. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 1431-1436.
5. Patterson, D. E.; Cramer, R. D.; Ferguson, A. M.; Clark, R. D.; Weinberger, L. E. Neighborhood Behavior: A Useful Concept for Validation of "Molecular Diversity" Descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 39, 3049-3059.
6. Flower, D. R. On the Properties of Bit String-Based Measures of Chemical Similarity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 379-386.
7. Lajiness, M. S. Dissimilarity-based Compound Selection Techniques. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 1997, 7/8, 65-84.
8. Willett, P.; Winterman, V. A. Comparison of Some Measures for the Determination of Intermolecular Structural Similarity. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1986, 5, 18-25.
9. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. Use of Structure-Activity Data to Compare Structure-Based Clustering Methods and Descriptors for Use in Compound Selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 572-584.
10. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. The Information Content of 2D and 3D Structural Descriptors Relevant to Ligand-Receptor Binding. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 1-9.
11. Matter, H. Selecting Optimally Diverse Compounds from Structure Databases: A Validation Study of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Molecular Descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 1219-1229.
12. Pötter, T.; Matter, H. Random or Rational Design? Evaluation of Diverse Compound Subsets from Chemical Structure Databases. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 478-488.
13. Ajay; Walters, W. P.; Murcko, M. A. Can We Learn to Distinguish between "Drug-like" and "Nondrug-like" Molecules? J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3314-3324.
14. Nys, G. G.; Rekker, R. F. Statistical Analysis of a Series of Partition Coefficients with Special Reference to the Predictability of Folding of Drug Molecules. The Introduction of Hydrophobic Fragmental Constants (f Values). Chim. Ther. 1973, 8, 521-529.
15. Klopman, G. Artificial Intelligence Approach to Structure-Activity Studies. Computer Automated Structure Evaluation of Biological Activity of Organic Molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 7315-7321.
16. Carhart, R. E.; Smith, D. H.; Venkataraghavan, R. Atom Pairs as Molecular Features in Structure-Activity Studies: Definition and Applications. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1985, 25, 64-73.
17. Holliday, J. D.; Ranade, S. S.; Willet, P. A Fast Algorithm for Selecting Sets of Dissimilar Molecules from Large Chemical Databases. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1995, 14, 501-506.
18. RBI HTS Library (LOPAC), Catalog No. SC001, Research Biochemicals, International, 1 Strathmore Rd., Natick, MA 01760-2447.
19. RBI 1997/1998 Catalog, Research Biochemicals International, 1 Strathmore Rd., Natick, MA 01760-2447.
20. Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics; Gilman, A. G., Goodman, L. S., Rall, T. W., Murad, F., Eds.; MacMillan Publishing Company: New York, 1985.
21. The Merk Index, 12th ed.; Budavari, S., Ed.; Merck & Co., Inc.: Whitehouse Station, NJ, 1996.
22. Nogrady, T. Medicinal Chemistry; Oxford University Press: New York, 1988.
23. MDL Information Systems, Inc., 14600 Catalina Street, San Leandro, CA 94577.
24. ISIS/Base 2.1.4; MDL Information Systems, Inc., San Leandro, CA.
25. MACCS-II Menu Reference Version 2.2; MDL Information Systems, Inc., San Leandro, CA, 1994.
26. Daylight 4.51; Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc., 27401 Los Altos, Suite 370, Mission Viejo, CA 92691.
27. Daylight Programs Reference Manual; Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc., Mission Viejo, CA, 1997.
28. Snarey, M.; Terrett, N. K.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J. Comparison of Algorithms for Dissimilarity-based Compound Selection. J. Mol. Graphics Mod. 1997, 15, 372-385.
29. Willett, P. Computational Tools for the Analysis of Molecular Diversity. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 1997, 7/8, 1-11.
30. Agrafiotis, D. K. Stochastic Algorithms for Maximizing Molecular Diversity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 841-851.
31. Higgs, R. E.; Bemis, K. G.; Watson, I. A.; Wikel, J. H. Experimental Designs for Selecting Molecules from Large Chemical Databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 861-870.
32. Dixon, S. L.; Villar, H. O. Bioactive Diversity and Screening Library Selection via Affinity Fingerprinting. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 1192-1203.