The effects of explicit feedback and form-meaning processing on the development of pragmatic proficiency in consciousness-raising tasks

System

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 601-614

  Takimoto, Masahiro ^a  

^a TEZUKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Consciousness raising task; Input based instruction; Pragmatic proficiency; Reactive explicit feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751204442     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2006.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alcón E. Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context?. System 33 3 (2005) 417-435
2. Bardovi-Harlig K., and Dörnyei Z. Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic vs. grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly 32 (1998) 233-259
3. Bardovi-Harlig K., and Hartford B. Congruence in native and nonnative conversations: Status balance in the academic advising session. Language Learning 40 (1990) 467-501
4. Beebe L., Takahashi T., and Uliss-Weltz R. Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In: Scarcella R., Anderson E., and Krashen S. (Eds). Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language (1990), Newbury House, New York 55-73
5. Blum-Kulka S., House J., and Kasper G. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies (1989), Ablex, Norwood, NJ
6. Carroll S., and Swain M. Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15 (1993) 357-366
7. Craik F., and Lockhart R. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11 (1972) 671-684
8. Ellis R. SLA Research and Language Teaching (1997), Oxford University Press, Oxford
9. Ellis R. Task-based Language Learning and Teaching (2003), Oxford University Press, Oxford
10. Faerch C., and Kasper G. Internal and external modification in interlanguage request realization. In: Blum-Kulka S., House J., and Kasper G. (Eds). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies (1989), Albex, Norwood, NJ 221-247
11. Fotos S. Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly 28 (1994) 323-351
12. Fotos S., and Ellis R. Communicating about grammar: A task-based approach. TESOL Quarterly 25 (1991) 605-628
13. Hill, T., 1997. The development of pragmatic competence in an EFL context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Japan.
14. House J. Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18 (1996) 225-252
15. House J., and Kasper G. Interlanguage pragmatics: Requesting in a foreign language. In: Loerscher W., and Schulze R. (Eds). Perspectives on Language in Performance (1987), Narr, Tübingen 1250-1288
16. Hudson, T., Detmer, E., Brown, J., 1992. A framework for testing cross-cultural pragmatics (Technical Report #2), Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press, HI.
17. Hudson, T., Detmer, E., Brown, J., 1995. Developing prototypic measures of cross-cultural pragmatics (Technical Report #7), Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press, HI.
18. Koike D., and Pearson L. The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System 33 3 (2005) 481-501
19. Kubota M. Teachability of conversational implicature to Japanese EFL learners. IRLT Bulletin 9 (1995) 35-67
20. Lyster R., and Ranta L. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19 (1997) 37-66
21. Nagata N. The effectiveness of computer-assisted metalinguistic instruction: A case study in Japanese. Foreign Language Annals 30 2 (1997) 187-200
22. Pearson, L., 1998. October. Spanish L2 pragmatics: The effects of metapragmatic discussion. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, University of Hawaii, Manoa.
23. Rosa, E., 1999. A cognitive approach to task-based research: Explicitness, awareness and L2 development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
24. Russell J., and Spada N. The effectiveness of corrective feedback for second language acquisition: A meta-analysis of the research. In: Norris J., and Ortega L. (Eds). Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching (2006), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 133-164
25. Samuda V. Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In: Bygate M., Skehan P., and Swain M. (Eds). Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing (2001), Longman, Essex, England 119-140
26. Schmidt, R., 1995. Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In: Schmidt, R. (Ed.), Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning (SLTCC Technical Report # 9), Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press, HI, pp. 1-64.
27. Schmidt R., and Frota S. Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In: Day R. (Ed). Talking to Learn: Conversation in Second Language Acquisition (1986), Newbury House, Rowley, MA 237-326
28. Sharwood Smith M. Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15 (1993) 165-179
29. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Version 10.0) [Computer software], 1998, SPSS, Chicago.
30. Takahashi S. Quantifying requestive imposition: Validation and selection of situation for L2 pragmatic research. Studies in Languages and Cultures vol. 9 (1998), Institute of Language and Cultures, Kyushu University 135-159
31. Takahashi S. The role of input enhancement in developing interlanguage pragmatic competence. In: Rose K., and Kasper G. (Eds). Pragmatics in Language Teaching (2001), Cambridge University Press, New York 171-199
32. Tateyama Y., Kasper G., Mui L., Tay H., and Thananart O. Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routines. In: Bouton L. (Ed). Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series vol. 8 (1997), Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL 163-178
33. International Communication Incorporated, 1996. TOEIC Friends, 2, pp. 37-41.