Teaching modern chemistry through 'recurrent historical teaching models'

Science and Education

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 197-216

  Chamizo, José Antonio ^a  

^a Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico Facultad de Quimica   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Chemical information growth; History teachers; Recurrent historical teaching model

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751192442     PISSN: 09267220     EISSN: 15731901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-005-4784-4     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Allchin, D.: 2000, 'How Not to Teach History in Science', Journal of College Science Teaching 30, 33-37.
2. Allchin, D.: 1997, 'Rekindling Phlogiston: from classroom case study to interdisciplinary relationships', Science & Education 6, 473-509.
3. Bachelard, G.: 1972, El compromiso racionalista, Siglo XXI, 1 Buenos Aires.
4. Barker, V.: 2000, Beyond Appearances: Students' misconceptions about basic chemical ideas, Royal Society of Chemistry, London.
5. Bunnet, J.F.: 1996, 'Physical Organic Terminology, after Ingold', Bulletin for the History of Chemistry 19, 33-43.
6. Breslow, R & Tirrell, M.V. (co-chairs): 2003, Beyond the Molecular Frontier. Challenge for Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, National Research Council, Washington.
7. Chamizo, J.A.: 2005, La enseñanza de la historia de la ciencia con modelos recurrentes.II El modelo de Lewis-Langmuir-Sidgwick Enseñanza de las ciencias Número extraordinario.
8. Chamizo, J.A. & Gutierrez, M.Y.: 2004, 'Conceptos fundamentales de química. I Valencia', Educación Quimica 15, 359-365.
9. Chamizo, J.A.: 2002, 'Towards the Essence of Chemistry' Proceedings from the 17th IUPAC International Conference on Chemical Education, Beijing, Chinese Chemical Society.
10. Chamizo, J.A.: 2001, The History of Chemistry in México. A Brief Approach to its Teaching, University of California, Los Angeles, Proceedings from the Sixth Conference of the IHPST.
11. Chemical Abstracts Service: 2005, Statistical Summary 1907-2004, Columbus, Chemical Abstracts.
12. Carr, M.: 1984, 'Model Confusion in Chemistry', Research in Science Education 14, 97-103.
13. Coll, R.K. & Taylor, I.: 2005, 'The Role of Models/and Analogies in Science Education: Implications from Research', International Journal of Science Education 27, 183-198.
14. Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J.: 2000, 'Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms', Science Education 84, 287-312.
15. De Vos, W., van Berkel, B. & Verdonk, A.H.: 1994, 'A Coherent Conceptual Structure of the Chemistry Curriculum', Journal of Chemical Education 71, 743-746.
16. Duschl, R.A.: 1994, Research in the History and Philosophy of Science, in D.L Gabel (ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, MacMillan, New York, pp. 443-465.
17. Ellis, J.: 1976, 'The Teaching of Organometallic Chemistry to Undergraduates', Journal of Chemical Education 53(1): 1-6.
18. Erduran, S. & Duschl, R.: 2004, 'Interdisciplinary Characterization of Models and the Nature of Chemical Knowledge in the Classroom', Studies in Science Education 40, 111-144.
19. Erduran, S. & Scerri, E.: 2002, 'The Nature of Chemical Knowledge and Chemical Education', in J.K. Gilbert, et al. (eds.), Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 7-27.
20. Gabel, D.: 1999, 'Improving Teaching and Learning through Chemistry Education Research: A Look to the Future', Journal of Chemical Education 76, 548-554.
21. Gabel, D.: 2002, "Foreword' in Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice', in J.K. Gilbert, et al. (eds.), Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. xv-xx.
22. Giere, R.: 1990, Explaining Science, A cognitive approach, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
23. Gilbert, J.K., De Jong, O., Justi, R., Treagust, D.F. & Van Driel, J.H.: 2002, 'Research and Development for the Future of Chemical Education', in J.K. Gilbert, et al. (eds.), Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 391-408.
24. Greenwood, N.N. & Earnshaw, A.: 1997, Chemistry of the Elements, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
25. Grossligth, K., Unger, C., Jay, E. & Smith, C.: 1991, 'Understanding Models and their Use in Science: Conceptions of Middle and High School Students and Experts', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29, 799-822.
26. Hall, N. (ed.): 2000, The New Chemistry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
27. Harrison, A.G. & Treagust, D.F.: 1996, 'Secondary Students Mental Models of Atoms and Molecules: Implications for Teaching Chemistry', Science Education 80, 509-534.
28. Hodson, D.: 2003, 'Time for Action: Science Education for an Alternative Future', International Journal of Science Education 25, 645-670.
29. Huheey, J.E., Keiter, E.A. & Keiter, R.L.: 1993, Inorganic Chemistry, HarperCollins, New York, Principles of structure and reactivity.
30. Husbands, C.: 2003, What is History Teaching? Language, Ideas and Meaning in Learning about the Past, Open University Press, Buckingham.
31. Izquierdo, M. & Adúriz, A.: 2003, 'Epistemological Foundations of School Science', Science & Education 12, 27-43.
32. umero extraordinario, junio 79-92.
33. James, L.K. (ed.): 1993, Nobel Laureates in Chemistry 1901-1992, American Chemical Society-Chemical Heritage Foundation, Washington.
34. Jensen, W.B.: 1998, 'One Chemical Revolution or Three?', Journal of Chemical Education 75, 961-969.
35. Justi, R.: 2000, 'Teaching with Historical Models', in J.K. Gilbert and C.J. Boutler (eds.), Developing Models in Science Education, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 209-226.
36. Justi, R. & Gilbert, J.: 2002, Models and Modeling in Chemical Education in Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 47-68.
37. Kragh, H.: 1987, An Introduction to the Historiography of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
38. Kuhn, T.S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
39. Laidler, K.J.: 1998, 'Contrast in Chemical Style: Sidgwick and Eyring', Bulletin of the History of Chemistry 22, 1-9.
40. Lakatos, I.: 1978, Mathematics, Science and Epistemology: Philosophical papers 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, J.Worral and G. Currie.
41. Langmuir, I.: 1919, 'The Arrangement of Electrons in Atoms and Molecules', Journal of the American Chemical Society 41, 868-881.
42. Lehninger, A.L., Nelson, D.L. & Cox, M.M.: 1993, Principles of Biochemistry, Worth Publishers, New York.
43. Lewis, G.N.: 1916, 'The Atom and the Molecule', Journal of the American Chemical Society 38, 762-786.
44. Lewis, G.N.: 1923, Valence and the Structure of Atoms and Molecules, The Chemical Catalog, New York.
45. Linnett, J.W.: 1961, 'A Modification of the Lewis-Langmuir Octet Rule', Journal of the American Chemical Society 83, 2643-2653.
46. Lowry, T.H. & Richardson, K.S.: 1987, Mechanism and Theory of Organic Chemistry, HarperCollins, New York.
47. Matthews, M.R.: 1994, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, London.
48. Millar, R. & Osborne, J. (eds.): 1999, Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future, King's College, London.
49. Mingos, D.M.P.: 1998, Essential Trends in Inorganic Chemistry, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
50. Moore, J.W.: 2005, 'Reaping the Benefits of Chemical Education Research', Journal of Chemical Education 82, 1431.
51. Morrison, R.T. & Boyd, R.N.: 1992, Organic Chemistry, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
52. Pickstone, J.V.: 1995, 'Past and Present Knowledges in the Practice of the History of Science', History of Science xxxiii, 203-224.
53. Purcell, K.F. & Kotz, J.C.: 1977, Inorganic Chemistry, Saunders, Philadelphia.
54. Royal Society of Chemistry: 2000, Cutting Edge Chemistry, London.
55. Scerri, E.R.: 2000, 'Philosophy of Chemistry - A New Interdisciplinary Field', Journal of Chemical Education 77, 522-525.
56. Schummer, J.: 1999, 'Coping with the Growth of Chemical Knowledge: Challenges for Chemistry Documentation, Education, and Working Chemists', Educación Quimica 10, 92-101.
57. Schummer, J.: 1997, 'Scientometric Studies on Chemistry I. The Exponential Growth of Chemical Substances 1800-1995', Scientometrics 37, 107-123.
58. Sidgwick, N.V.: 1927, The Electronic Theory of Valence, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
59. Solomon, J. & Aikenhead, G. (eds.): 1994, STS Education: International Perspectives on Reform, Teachers College Press-Columbia University Press, New York.
60. Suckling, C.J., Suckling, K.E. & Suckling, C.W.: 1978, Chemistry through Models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
61. Tague, J., Beheshti, J. & Rees-Potter, L.: 1981, 'The Law of Exponential Growth: Evidence, Implications, and Forecasts', Library Trends 30, 125-150.
62. Tiles, M.: 1984, Bachelard: Science and Objectivity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
63. Tosh, N.: 2003, 'Anachronism and Retrospective Explanation: In Defence of a Present Centred History of Science', Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34, 647-659.
64. Taber, K.: 2002, Chemical Misconceptions - Prevention, Diagnosis, and Cure (2 Volumes), Royal Society of Chemistry, London.
65. Tolman, C.A.: 1972, 'The 16 and 18 Electron Rule in Organometallic Chemistry and Homogeneous Catalysis', Chemical Society Reviews 1, 337-353.
66. Toulmin, S.: 1972, Human Understanding, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
67. Van Aalsvoort, J.: 2004, 'Logical Positivism as a Tool to Analyse the Problem of Chemistry's Lack of Relevance in Secondary School Chemical Education', International Journal of Science Education 26, 1151-1168.
68. Van Berkel, B., de Vos Veronk, W. & Pilot, A.: 2000, 'Normal Science Education and its Dangers: The case of School Chemistry', Science & Education 9, 123-159.
69. Wandersee, J.H. & Griffard, P.B.: 2002, 'The History of Chemistry: Potential and Actual Contributions to Chemical Education', in J.K. Gilbert, et al. (eds.). Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice., Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 29-46.
70. Wandersee, J.H. & Roach, L.M.: 1998, 'Interactive historical vignettes', in J.J. Mintzes, et al. (eds.), Teaching Science for Understanding: A Human Constructivist View, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 281-306.
71. Yager, R.E.: 2004, 'Science is Not Written, But It Can Be Written About', in W. Saul (ed.), Crossing Borders in Literacy and Science Instruction, NSTA, Washington, pp. 95-107.