Effect of sequence-directed nucleosome disruption on cell-type-specific repression by α2/Mcm1 in the yeast genome

Eukaryotic Cell

Volumn 5, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1925-1933

  Morohashi, Nobuyuki ^a   Yamamoto, Yuichi ^a   Kuwana, Shunsuke ^a   Morita, Wataru ^a   Shindo, Heisaburo ^b   Mitchell, Aaron P ^c   Shimizu, Mitsuhiro ^a  

^a MEISEI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF PHARMACY AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Japan)

^c Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ASPARTIC PROTEINASE; BAR1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; DNA; FUN80 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; ISWI PROTEIN; REPRESSOR PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHROMATIN; CONFORMATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GENOME; METABOLISM; NUCLEOSOME; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; ASPARTIC ENDOPEPTIDASES; BASE SEQUENCE; CHROMATIN; DNA; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENOME, FUNGAL; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; NUCLEOSOMES; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 33751163503     PISSN: 15359778     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/EC.00105-06     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alexeev, D. G., A. A. Lipanov, and I. Skuratovskii. 1987. Poly(dA) · poly(dT) is a B-type double helix with a distinctively narrow minor groove. Nature 325:821-823.
2. 5dC). Biochemistry 26:5595-5599.
3. Barwell, K. J., J. H. Boysen, W. Xu, and A. P. Mitchell. 2005. Relationship of DFG16 to the Rim101p pH response pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 4:890-899.
4. Bi, X., Q. Yu, J. J. Sandmeier, and Y. Zou. 2004. Formation of boundaries of transcriptionally silent chromatin by nucleosome-excluding structures. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:2118-2131.
5. Bone, J. R., and S. Y. Roth. 2001. Recruitment of the yeast Tup1p-Ssn6p repressor is associated with localized decreases in histone acetylation. J. Biol. Chem. 276:1808-1813.
6. 12 sequence to be organized into nucleosome-cores. Nucleic Acids Res. 15:8899-8918.
7. Champ, P. C., S. Maurice, J. M. Vargason, T. Camp, and P. S. Ho. 2004. Distributions of Z-DNA and nuclear factor I in human chromosome 22: a model for coupled transcriptional regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:6501-6510.
8. 1 arrest by a factor and α factor pheromones. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2:11-20.
9. Cooper, J. P., S. Y. Roth, and R. T. Simpson. 1994. The global transcriptional regulators, SSN6 and TUP1, play distinct roles in the establishment of a repressive chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 8:1400-1410.
10. Davie, J. K., D. G. Edmondson, C. B. Coco, and S. Y. Dent. 2003. Tup1-Ssn6 interacts with multiple class I histone deacetylases in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 278:50158-50162.
11. Edmondson, D. G., M. M. Smith, and S. Y. Roth. 1996. Repression domain of the yeast global represser Tup1 interacts directly with histones H3 and H4. Genes Dev. 10:1247-1259.
12. Fazzio, T. G., M. E. Gelbart, and T. Tsukiyama. 2005. Two distinct mechanisms of chromatin interaction by the Isw2 chromatin remodeling complex in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:9165-9174.
13. Fazzio, T. G., and T. Tsukiyama. 2003. Chromatin remodeling in vivo: evidence for a nucleosome sliding mechanism. Mol. Cell 12:1333-1340.
14. Ganter, B., S. Tan, and T. J. Richmond. 1993. Genomic footprinting of the promoter regions of STE2 and STE3 genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Mol. Biol. 234:975-987.
15. Garner, M. M., and G. Felsenfeld. 1987. Effect of Z-DNA on nucleosome placement. J. Mol. Biol. 196:581-590.
16. Gelbart, M. E., N. Bachman, J. Delrow, J. D. Boeke, and T. Tsukiyama. 2005. Genome-wide identification of Isw2 chromatin-remodeling targets by localization of a catalytically inactive mutant. Genes Dev. 19:942-954.
17. Gelbart, M. E., T. Rechsteiner, T. J. Richmond, and T. Tsukiyama. 2001. Interactions of Isw2 chromatin remodeling complex with nucleosomal arrays: analyses using recombinant yeast histones and immobilized templates. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:2098-2106.
18. Herschbach, B. M., M. B. Arnaud, and A. D. Johnson. 1994. Transcriptional repression directed by the yeast α2 protein in vitro. Nature 370:309-311.
19. Iyer, V., and K. Struhl. 1995. Poly(dA:dT), a ubiquitous promoter element that stimulates transcription via its intrinsic DNA structure. EMBO J. 14:2570-2579.
20. Keleher, C. A., C. Goutte, and A. D. Johnson. 1988. The yeast cell-type-specific represser α2 acts cooperatively with a non-cell-type-specific protein. Cell 53:927-936.
21. Keleher, C. A., M. J. Redd, J. Schultz, M. Carlson, and A. D. Johnson. 1992. Ssn6-Tup1 is a general repressor of transcription in yeast. Cell 68:709-719.
22. n sequences in Escherichia coli and Halobacterium halobium plasmids. Stabilization by increasing repeat length and DNA supercoiling but not salinity. J. Biol. Chem. 271:9340-9346.
23. Liu, H., N. Mulholland, H. Fu, and K. Zhao. 2006. Cooperative activity of BRG1 and Z-DNA formation in chromatin remodeling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:2550-2559.
24. Liu, R., H. Liu, X. Chen, M. Kirby, P. O. Brown, and K. Zhao. 2001. Regulation of CSF1 promoter by the SWI/SNF-Iike BAF complex. Cell 106:309-318.
25. n-tracts as revealed by cyclobutane thymine-thymine dimer formation. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:4491-4496.
26. Mai, X., S. Chou, and K. Struhl. 2000. Preferential accessibility of the yeast his3 promoter is determined by a general property of the DNA sequence, not by specific elements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:6668-6676.
27. Manney, T. R. 1983. Expression of the BAR1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: induction by the α mating pheromone of an activity associated with a secreted protein. J. Bacteriol. 155:291-301.
28. McConnell, K. J., and D. L. Beveridge. 2001. Molecular dynamics simulations of B'-DNA: sequence effects on A-tract-induced bending and flexibility. J. Mol. Biol. 314:23-40.
29. Mennella, T. A., L. G. Klinkenberg, and R. S. Zitomer. 2003. Recruitment of Tup1-Ssn6 by yeast hypoxic genes and chromatin-independent exclusion of TATA binding protein. Eukaryot. Cell 2:1288-1303.
30. Oh, D. B., Y. G. Kim, and A. Rich. 2002. Z-DNA-binding proteins can act as potent effectors of gene expression in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:16666-16671.
31. Patterton, H. G., and R. T. Simpson. 1994. Nucleosomal location of the STE6 TATA box and Matα2p-mediated repression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:4002-4010.
32. Rahmouni, A. R., and R. D. Wells. 1989. Stabilization of Z DNA in vivo by localized supercoiling. Science 246:358-363.
33. Reardon, B. J., D. Gordon, M. J. Ballard, and E. Winter. 1995. DNA binding properties of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DAT1 gene product. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4900-4906.
34. Redd, M. J., M. B. Arnaud, and A. D. Johnson. 1997. A complex composed of tup1 and ssn6 represses transcription in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 272:11193-11197.
35. Redd, M. J., M. R. Stark, and A. D. Johnson. 1996. Accessibility of α2-repressed promoters to the activator Gal4. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:2865-2869.
36. Roth, S. Y., A. Dean, and R. T. Simpson. 1990. Yeast α2 repressor positions nucleosomes in TRP1/ARS1 chromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:2247-2260.
37. Roth, S. Y., M. Shimizu, L. Johnson, M. Grunstein, and R. T. Simpson. 1992. Stable nucleosome positioning and complete repression by the yeast α2 repressor are disrupted by amino-terminal mutations in histone H4. Genes Dev. 6:411-425.
38. Ruiz, C., V. Escribano, E. Morgado, M. Molina, and M. J. Mazon. 2003. Cell-type-dependent repression of yeast a-specific genes requires Itc1p, a subunit of the Isw2p-Itc1p chromatin remodelling complex. Microbiology 149:341-351.
39. Schroth, G. P., and P. S. Ho. 1995. Occurrence of potential cruciform and H-DNA forming sequences in genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:1977-1983.
40. Sekinger, E. A., Z. Moqtaderi, and K. Struhl. 2005. Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions and low nucleosome density are important for preferential accessibility of promoter regions in yeast. Mol. Cell 18:735-748.
41. Shimizu, M., T. Mori, T. Sakurai, and H. Shindo. 2000. Destabilization of nucleosomes by an unusual DNA conformation adopted by poly(dA) • poly(dT) tracts in vivo. EMBO J. 19:3358-3365.
42. Shimizu, M., S. Y. Roth, C. Szent-Gyorgyi, and R. T. Simpson. 1991. Nucleosomes are positioned with base pair precision adjacent to the α2 operator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 10:3033-3041.
43. Simpson, R. T., and P. Kunzler. 1979. Chromatin and core particles formed from the inner histones and synthetic polydeoxyribonucleotides of defined sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 6:1387-1415.
44. Simpson, R. T., S. Y. Roth, R. H. Morse, H. G. Patterton, J. P. Cooper, M. Murphy, M. P. Kladde, and M. Shimizu. 1993. Nucleosome positioning and transcription. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 58:237-245.
45. Sinden, R. R. 1994. DNA structure and function. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
46. Smith, R. L., and A. D. Johnson. 2000. Turning genes off by Ssn6-Tup1: a conserved system of transcriptional repression in eukaryotes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:325-330.
47. Spellman, P. T., G. Sherlock, M. Q. Zhang, V. R. Iyer, K. Anders, M. B. Eisen, P. O. Brown, D. Botstein, and B. Futcher. 1998. Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol. Biol. Cell 9:3273-3297.
48. Suter, B., G. Schnappauf, and F. Thoma. 2000. Poly(dA · dT) sequences exist as rigid DNA structures in nucleosome-free yeast promoters in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:4083-4089.
49. Thastrom, A., L. M. Bingham, and J. Widom. 2004. Nucleosomal locations of dominant DNA sequence motifs for histone-DNA interactions and nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 338:695-709.
50. Wang, Y. H., S. Amirhaeri, S. Kang, R. D. Wells, and J. D. Griffith. 1994. Preferential nucleosome assembly at DNA triplet repeats from the myotonic dystrophy gene. Science 265:669-671.
51. Watson, A. D., D. G. Edmondson, J. R. Bone, Y. Mukai, Y. Yu, W. Du, D. J. Stillman, and S. Y. Roth. 2000. Ssn6-Tup1 interacts with class I histone deacetylases required for repression. Genes Dev. 14:2737-2744.
52. Wu, J., N. Suka, M. Carlson, and M. Grunstein. 2001. TUP1 utilizes histone H3/H2B-specific HDA1 deacetylase to repress gene activity in yeast. Mol. Cell 7:117-126.
53. Xu, W., and A. P. Mitchell. 2001. Yeast PalA/AIP1/Alix homolog Rim20p associates with a PEST-like region and is required for its proteolytic cleavage. J. Bacteriol. 183:6917-6923.
54. Yu, Q., J. Sandmeier, H. Xu, Y. Zou, and X. Bi. 2006. Mechanism of the long range anti-silencing function of targeted histone acetyltransferases in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 281:3980-3988.
55. Yuan, G. C., Y. J. Liu, M. F. Dion, M. D. Slack, L. F. Wu, S. J. Altschuler, and O. J. Rando. 2005. Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae. Science 309:626-630.
56. Zhang, Z., and J. C. Reese. 2004. Redundant mechanisms are used by Ssn6-Tup1 in repressing chromosomal gene transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 279:39240-392450.
57. Zhang, Z., and J. C. Reese. 2004. Ssn6-Tup1 requires the ISW2 complex to position nucleosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 23:2246-2257.
58. Zhu, Z., and D. J. Thiele. 1996. A specialized nucleosome modulates transcription factor access to a C. glabrala metal responsive promoter. Cell 87:459-470.