Pyramids or silos: Alternative representations of the systems thinking paradigms

Systemic Practice and Action Research

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 383-398

  Pollack, Julien ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Critical systems thinking; Hard and soft paradigms; Paradigmatic incommensurability; Pluralism

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751072657     PISSN: 1094429X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11213-006-9025-5     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Brocklesby J (1997). Becoming multimethodology literate: An assessment of the cognitive difficulties of working across paradigms. In: Mingers J, Gill A (eds) Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 189-216
2. Burrell G, Morgan G (1979) Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. Gower Publishing, Aldershot, England
3. Callo VN, Packham RG (1999) The use of soft systems methodology in emancipatory development. Syst Res Behav Sci 16:311-319
4. Checkland P (1981) Systems thinking, systems practice. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
5. Checkland P, Holwell S (2004) "Classic" OR and "soft" OR - an asymmetric complementarity. In: Pidd M (ed) Systems modelling: theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 45-60
6. Clarke S (2001) Mixing methods for organisational intervention: background and current status. In : Nicholls M, Clarke S, Lehaney B (eds) Mixed-Mode modelling: mixing methodologies for organisational intervention. Kluwer Academic, London
7. Clayton J, Gregory W (2000) Reflections on critical systems thinking and the management of change in rule-bound systems. J Organ Change Manage 13(2): 140-161
8. Coyle G (2000) Qualitative and quantitative modelling in systems dynamics: some research questions. Syst Dyn Rev 16:225-244
9. Crawford L, Pollack J (2004) Hard and soft projects: a framework for analysis. Int J Proj Manage 22:645-653
10. Crawford L, Pollack J, Costello K (2005) Hard and soft projects in the NSW public sector. In: Richardson K, Gregory W, Midgley G (eds) Proceedings of the 11th Annual ANZSYS Conference/Managing the Complex V, Christchurch, New Zealand, 5-7 December, 2005
11. Fitzgerald B, Howcroft D (1998) Towards dissolution of the IS research debate: from polarization to polarity. J Inf Technol 13:313-326
12. Flood R, Jackson M (1991a) Total Systems Intervention: A Practical Face to Critical Systems Thinking. Syst Pract 4(3):197-213
13. Flood R, Jackson M (1991b) Overview. In: Flood R, Jackson M (eds) In critical systems thinking: Directed readings. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 1-9
14. Flood R, Romm N (1997) From METATHEORY to "Multimethodology." In: Mingers J, Gill A (eds) Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 291-322
15. Gao F, Li M, Nakamori Y (2003) Critical systems thinking as a way to manage knowledge. Syst Res Behav Sci 20:3-19
16. Habermas J (1971) In: Shapira J (trans) Knowledge and human interests. Beacon Press, Boston
17. Gregory W (1996a) Discordant pluralism: A new strategy for critical systems thinking. Syst Pract 9(6):605-625
18. Gregory W (1996b) Dealing with diversity. In: Flood R, Romm N (eds) Critical systems thinking: Current research and practice. Plenum Press, New York, 37-61
19. Hanrahan M, Cooper T, Burrougs-Lange S (1999) The place of personal writing in a Phd thesis: epistemological and methodological considerations. Qual Stud Educ 12(4):401-416
20. Healy M, Perry C (2000) Comprehensive criteria to judge the validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm. Qual Mark Res: Int J 3:118-126
21. Higgs J (2001) Charting standpoints in qualitative research. In: Byrne-Armstrong H, Higgs J, Horstall D (eds) Critical moments in qualitative research. Butterworth-Heinmann, Oxford, pp 45-67
22. Inghilleri M (2000) Intersubjectivity: the holy grail of mutual understanding. Lang Commun 20(2):133-148
23. Jackson M (1987) New directions in management science. In: Jackson M, Keys P (eds) New directions in management science. Gower, Aldershot, pp 133-164
24. Jackson M (1991) The origins and nature of critical systems thinking. Syst Pract 4(2): 131-149
25. Jackson M (1997a) Critical systems thinking and information systems research. In: Stowell F, Mingers J (eds) Information systems: An emerging discipline? McGraw-Hill, London, pp 201-238
26. Jackson M (1997b) Pluralism in systems thinking and practice. In Mingers J, Gill A (eds) Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 347-378
27. Jackson M (1999) Towards coherent pluralism in management science. J Oper Res Soc 50:12-22
28. Jackson M (2000) Systems approaches to management. Plenum, New York
29. Jackson M, Keys P (1984) Towards a system of systems methodologies. J Oper Res Soc 35(6):473-486
30. Klein H, Myers M (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q 23(1):67-94
31. Lane DC (2000) Should systems dynamics be described as a 'hard' or 'deterministic' systems approach? Syst Res Behav Sci 17:3-22
32. Lane DC, Oliva R (1998) The greater whole: Towards a synthesis of system dynamics and soft systems methodology. Eur J Oper Res 107:214-235
33. McQuinn W (2002) Comment on how to conduct an action research study in the domain of information systems development. In: Ragsdell G et al. (eds) Systems theory and practice in the knowledge age. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York
34. Midgley G (1996a) What is this thing called CST? In: Flood R, Romm N (eds) Critical systems thinking: Current research and practice. Plenum Press, New York, 11-24
35. Midgley G (1996b) The ideal of unity and the practice of pluralism in systems science. In: Flood R, Romm N (eds) Critical systems thinking: Current research and practice. Plenum Press, New York, pp 25-36
36. Midgley G (1997a) Mixing methods: Developing systemic intervention. In: Mingers J, Gill A (eds) Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 249-290
37. Midgley G (1997b) Developing the methodology of TSI: From the oblique use of methods to creative design. Syst Pract 10(3):305-319
38. Midgley G (2000) Systemic intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice. Plenum Publishers, New York
39. Midgley G (2003) Science as systemic intervention: Some implications of systems thinking and complexity for the philosophy of science. Syst Pract Action Res 16(2):77-97
40. Miles R (1988) Combining 'Soft' and 'Hard' systems practice: Grafting or embedding? J Appl Syst Anal 15:55-60
41. Mingers J (1997a) Multi-paradigm multimethodology. In: Mingers J, Gill A (eds) Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 1-20
42. Mingers J (1997b) Towards critical pluralism. In: Mingers J, Gill A (eds) Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 407-440
43. Mingers J (2003) The paucity of multimethod research: a review of the information systems literature. Inf Syst J 13:233-249
44. Mingers J, Brocklesby J (1997) Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega, Int J Manage Sci 25:489-509
45. Mingers J, Taylor S (1992) The use of soft systems methodology in practice. J Oper Res Soc 43:321-332
46. Morgan G (1990) Paradigm diversity in organizational research. In: Hassard J, Pym D (eds) The theory and philosophy of organizations. Routledge, London, pp 13-29
47. Oakley P (2003) How the name date (Harvard) reference style in papers shows an underlying interpretivist paradigm whilst numeric references show a functional paradigm. Systemist 25(1):25-30
48. Ormerod R (1997) The Design of Organisational Intervention. Int J Manage Sci 25:415-435
49. Oxford University Press (2004) Oxford English Dictionary. Accessed online at http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/00114444?single=1&query_type= word&queryword=incommensurable&edition =2e&first=1&max_to_show= 10, Accessed 22/11/2004, Oxford University Press
50. Paton G (2001) A systemic action learning cycle as the key element of an ongoing spiral of analyses. Syst Pract Act Res 14(1):95-111
51. Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2 edn. Sage, London
52. Pidd M (2004) Complementarity in systems modelling. In: Pidd M (ed) Systems modelling: Theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 1-20
53. Ragsdell G (2000) Engineering a paradigm shift? An holistic approach to organisational change management. J Organ Change Manage 13:104-120
54. Reichardt C, Cook T (1979) Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods. In: Cook T, Reichardt C (eds) Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Sage, London, pp 7-32
55. Spaul M (1997) Multimethodology and critical theory: an Intersection of Interests? In: Mingers J, Gill A (eds) Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 323-346
56. Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, Dillon L (2003) Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. Accessed Online at http://www.strategy.gov.uk/files/pdf/Quality_framework.pdf, UK Cabinet Office: Government Chief Social Researcher's Office
57. Ticehurst G, Veal A (2000) Business research methods. Malaysia, Pearson Education Australia
58. Weber R (2004) Editor's comments: The rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: A personal view. MIS Q 28 (1):iii-xii
59. White L, Taket A (1997) Critiquing Multimethodology as Metamethodology: Working towards pragmatic pluralism. In: Mingers J, Gill A (eds) Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 379-405
60. Winter M, Checkland P (2003) Soft systems: a fresh perspective for project management. Proceedings of the ICE 156:187-192
61. Yeo KT (1993) Systems thinking and project management - time to reunite. Int J Proj Manage 11:111-117
62. Zhu Z (2000) WSR: A systems approach for information systems development. Syst Res Behav Sci 17(2): 183-203