The place of personal writing in a PhD thesis: Epistemological and methodological considerations?

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 401-416

  Hanrahan, Mary ^a   Cooper, Tom ^a   Burroughs Lange, Sue ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008844515     PISSN: 09518398     EISSN: 13665898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/095183999236051     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baird, J. R. (1986). Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: a classroom study. European Journal of Science Education, 8, 263-282.
2. Baird, J.R., & Northfield, J.R. (Eds.). (1992). Learning from the PEEL experience. M elbourne, Australia: Editors.
3. Borkowski, J. G., Carr, M., Rellinger, E., & Pressley, M. (1990). Self-regulated cognition: Interdependence of metacognition, attribution, and self-esteem. In B. F. J ones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 53-92). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. London: Harvard University Press.
5. Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research (Revised ed.). Victoria, Australia: Deakin University.
6. Collins, A., Brown, J., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honour of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-493). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Collins, E., & Green, J. L. (1992). Learning in classroom settings: M aking or breaking a culture. In H. H. Marshall (Ed.), Redefining students’learning: Roots of educational change (pp. 59-85). N orwood, NJ: Ablex.
8. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. EducationalResearcher, 19, 2-14.
9. Driver, R. (1988). Theory into practice II: A constructivist approach to curriculum development. In P. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education. London: Falmer Press.
10. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
11. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. London: Sage.
12. Hanrahan, M. (1997). Science for all: Action researching literacy difficulties in a Year 8 science class. Paper prepared for the “Convergence in Knowledge, Space and Time” World Congresses, the 4th on Action Learning, Action Research and Process M anagement, and the 8th on Participatory Action Research, Cartagena, June 1997.
13. Heller, A. (1997) Keynote address presented at the “Convergence in Knowledge, Space and Time” World Congresses, the 4th on Action Learning, Action Research and Process M anagement, and the 8th on Participatory Action Research, Cartagena, June 1997.
14. Jones, B. F., & Idol, L. (Eds.). (1990). Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: the implications of children’s science. Auckland: H einemann.
16. Paris, S. G., & W inograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Phillips, E. M., & Pugh, D. S. (1990). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors. M ilton Keynes: Open University Press.
18. Pintrich, P. R., M arx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167-199.
19. Posner, G.J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
20. QUT (Queensland University of Technology). (1993). PhD Handbook. Brisbane: Office of Research, QUT.
21. Rorty, R. (1985). Habermas and Lyotard on postmodernity. In R. J. Bernstein (Ed.), Social and political theory from Polity Press. Habermas and postmodernity (pp. 161-175). Cambridge: Polity Press.
22. Stenhouse, L. (1980). Reflections. In L. Stenhouse (Ed.), Curriculum research and development in action (pp. 244-262). London: Heinemann Educational Books.
23. Sutton, C. R. (1992). W ords, science and learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.
24. Tobin, K. (Ed.). (1993). T he practice of constructivism in science education. Washington, DC: AAAS Press.
25. W alkerdine, V. (1994). Subjectivity, gender and method. Keynote address presented attheAnnualM eeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Lismore, NSW.
26. Watts, M., & Bentley, D. (1987). Constructivism in the classroom: enabling conceptualchange by words and deeds. British Educational Research Journal, 13, 121-135.
27. White, R., & Baird, J. (1991). Teaching for learning: the view from cognitive psychology. In J. Biggs (Ed.), Learning to think and thinking to learn (pp. 146 176). Hawthorn: Acer.
28. White, R.T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1989). Metalearning and conceptual change. International J ournal of Science Education, 11, 577-586.
29. Woods, P. (1985). Ethnography and theory construction in educational research. In R. G. Burgess (Ed.), Field methods in the study of education (pp. 51-76). London: Falmer Press.