Erratum to: Glaucoma detection using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system [Expert Systems with Applications 32 (2) (2007) 458-468] (DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.010);Glaucoma detection using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 458-468

  Huang, Mei Ling ^a   Chen, Hsin Yi ^b   Huang, Jian Jun ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIN YI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system; Glaucoma; Orthogonal array; Stratus OCT

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; COHERENT LIGHT; DECISION MAKING; RANDOM PROCESSES; TOMOGRAPHY;

ADAPTIVE NEURO FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM (ANFIS); GLAUCOMA DETECTION; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY (OCT); RECEIVER OPERATIVE CHARACTERISTIC (ROC);

FUZZY SETS;

EID: 33751023570     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.11.001     Document Type: Erratum

References (42)

1. Belal S.Y., Taktak A.F.G., Nevill A.J., Spencer S.A., Roden D., and Bevan S. Automatic detection of distorted plethysmogram pulses in neonates and paediatric patients using an adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 24 (2002) 149-165
2. Bowd C., Chan K., Zangwill L.M., et al. Comparing neural networks and linear discriminant functions for glaucoma detection using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy of the optic disc. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 43 (2002) 3444-3454
3. Brigatti L., Hoffman B.A., and Caprioli J. Neural networks to identify glaucoma with structural and functional measurements. American Journal of Ophthalmology 121 (1996) 511-521
4. Brigatti L., Nouri-Mahdavi K., Weitzman M., et al. Automatic detection of glaucomatous visual field progression with neural networks. Archives of Ophthalmology 115 (1997) 725-728
5. Chen, H. Y., & Huang, M. L. (2005). Discrimination between normal and glaucomatous eyes using Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography in Taiwan Chinese subjects. Graefes Archives for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. online April 15.
6. Chen H.Y., Hung P.T., and Hung T.J. Optical coherence tomography study on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in open angle glaucoma. American Journal of Ophthalmology 139 suppl S53 (2005) Abstract
7. Chen, H. Y., Wang, T. H., Lee, Y. M., & Hung, T. J. (in press). Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography and its correlation with visual field defects in early glaucoma. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association.
8. Cheng H.D., Lui Y.M., and Freimanis M.R. A novel approach to microcalcification detection using fuzzy logic technique. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 17 (1998) 442-450
9. Choplin N.T., Lundy D.C., and Dreher A.W. Differentiating patients with glaucoma from glaucoma suspects and normal subjects by nerve fiber layer assessment with scanning laser polarimetry. Ophthalmology 105 (1998) 2068-2076
10. Cioffi G.A., Robin A.L., Eastman R.D., et al. Confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope: reproducibility of optic nerve head topographic measurements with the confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 100 (1993) 57-62
11. Fuzzy Logic Toolbox (2005). For use with Matlab, user's guide, Version 2 (pp. 2-20). The MathWorks, Inc.
12. Goldbaum M.H., Sample P.A., Chan K., et al. Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 43 (2002) 162-169
13. Goldbaum M.H., Sample P.A., White H., et al. Discrimination of normal and glaucomatous visual fields by neural network. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 31 (1990) S503 Abstract nr 2471
14. Goldbaum M.H., Sample P.A., White H., et al. Interpretation of automated perimetry for glaucoma by neural network. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 35 (1994) 3362-3373
15. Greany M.J., Hoffman D.C., Garway-Heath D.F., et al. Comparisons of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 43 (2002) 140-145
16. Guedes V., Schuman J.S., Herzmark E., et al. Optical coherence tomography measurement of macular and nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous human eyes. Ophthalmology 110 (2003) 177-189
17. Henson D.B., Spenceley S.E., and Bull D.R. Artificial neural network analysis of noisy visual field data in glaucoma. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 10 (1997) 99-113
18. Hoh S.T., Greenfield D.S., Mistlberger A., et al. Optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes. American Journal of Ophthalmology 129 (2000) 129-135
19. Hoh S.T., Ishikawa H., Greenfield D.S., et al. Peripapillary nerve fiber layer thickness measurement reproducibility using scanning laser polarimetry. Journal of Glaucoma 7 (1998) 712-715
20. Horn F., Jonas K., Martus J.B., et al. Polarimetric measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma diagnosis. Journal of Glaucoma 8 (1999) 353-362
21. Huang M.L., and Chen H.Y. Development and comparison of automated classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis using stratus optical coherence tomography. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 46 (2005) 4121-4129
22. Huang M.L., Chen H.Y., and Hung P.T. Analysis of glaucoma diagnosis with automated classifiers using stratus optical coherence tomography. Optical and Quantum Electronics 37 (2005) 1239-1249
23. Iester M., Jonas J.B., Mardin C.Y., et al. Discrimination analysis models for early detection of glaucomatous optic disc changes. British Journal of Ophthalmology 84 (2000) 464-468
24. Kanamori A., Nakamura M., Escano M.F.T., et al. Evaluation of the glaucomatous damage on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg retina tomography, GDx nerve fiber analyzer, and optical coherence tomography. American Journal of Ophthalmology 135 (2003) 513-520
25. Loukas Y.L. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems: an instant and architecture-free predictor for improving QSAR studies. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 44 (2001) 2772-2783
26. Medeiros F.A., Zangwill L.M., Bowd C., et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. American Journal of Ophthalmology 139 (2005) 44-55
27. Mutlukan E., and Keating K. Visual field interpretation with a personal computer based neural network. Eye 8 (1994) 321-323
28. Nauck D., and Kruse R. Obtaining interpretable fuzzy classification rules from medical data. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 16 (1999) 149-169
29. Penedo M.G., Carreira A., Mosquera A., and Cabello D. Comuter-aided diagnosis: A neural-network-based approach to lung nodile detection. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 17 (1998) 872-880
30. Sanchez-Galeana C., Bowd C., Blumenthal E.Z., et al. Using optical imaging summary data to detect glaucoma. Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 1812-1818
31. Schuman J.S. In: Puliafito C.A., and Fujimoto J.G. (Eds). Optical coherence tomography of ocular disease. 2nd ed. (2004), Slack, Thorofare, NJ
32. Schuman J.S., Hee M.R., Puliafito C.A., et al. Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Archives of Ophthalmology 113 (1995) 586-596
33. Übeyli E.D., and Güler I. Automatic detection of erythemato-squamous diseases using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems. Computers in Biology and Medicine 35 (2005) 421-433
34. Uchida H., Brigatti L., and Caprioli J. Detection of structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 37 (1996) 2393-2401
35. Weinreb R.N., Shakiba S., Sample P.A., et al. Association between quantitative nerve fiber layer measurement and visual field loss in glaucoma. American Journal of Ophthalmology 120 (1995) 732-738
36. Williams Z.Y., Schuman J.S., Gamell L., et al. Optical coherence tomography measurement of nerve fiber layer thickness and the likelihood of a visual field defect. American Journal of Ophthalmology 134 (2002) 538-546
37. Wollstein G., Garway-Heath D.F., and Hitchings R.A. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 105 (1998) 1557-1563
38. Wollstein G., Ishikawa H., Wang J., et al. Comparison of three optical coherence tomography scanning areas for detection of glaucomatous damage. American Journal of Ophthalmology 139 (2005) 39-43
39. Yen J., and Langari R. Fuzzy logic: Intelligence, control and information (1999), Prentice-Hall Inc. p. 444
40. Yu S., and Guan L. A CAD system for the automatic detection of clustered microclacification in digitized mammogram films. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 19 (2000) 115-126
41. Zafar S., Gürses-Özden R., Makornwattana M., et al. Scanning protocol choice affects optical coherence tomography (OCT-3) measurements. Journal of Glaucoma 13 (2004) 142-144
42. Zangwill L.M., Bowd C., Berry C.C., et al. Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg retina tomography, GDx nerve fiber analyzer, and optical coherence tomography. Archives of Ophthalmology 119 (2001) 985-993