Automatic detection of glaucomatous visual field progression with neural networks

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 115, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 725-728

  Brigatti, Luca ^a   Nouri Mahdavi, Kouros ^a   Weitzman, Marc ^a   Caprioli, Joseph ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; DATA BASE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 0030958701     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150727005     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Werner EB, Petrig B, Krupin T, Bishop K. Variability of automated visual fields in clinically stable glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei. 1989;30: 1083-1089.
2. Boeglin RJ, Caprioli J, Zulauf M. Long-term fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113:396-400.
3. Bebie H, Fankhauser F. Statistical program for the analysis of perimetric data. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1981;26:9-10.
4. Holmin C, Krakau CET. Regression analysis of the central visual field in chronic glaucoma cases: a follow-up study using automatic perimetry. Acta Ophthal-mol. 1982;60:267-274.
5. Wu DC, Schwarte B, Nagin P. Trend analyses of automated visual fields. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1987:49:175-189.
6. Hills JF, Johnson CA. Evaluation of the f test as a method of detecting visual field changes. Ophthalmology. 1988:95:261-266.
7. Hoskins HD, Magee SD, Drake MV, Kidd MM. Confidence intervals for change in automated visual fields. Br J Ophthalmol. 1988:72:591-597.
8. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Lindgren A, et al. Extended empirical statistical package for evaluation of single and multiple fields in glaucoma: statpac 2. In: Mills, RP, Heijl, A, eds. Perimetry Update 1990/1991. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kugler Publications; 1991:303-315.
9. Morgan RK, Feuer WJ, Anderson DR. Statpac 2 glaucoma change probability. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1690-1692.
10. . 10. Noureddin BN, Poinoosawmy D, Fietzke FW, Hitchings RA. Regression analysis of visual field progression in low-tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991; 75:493-495.
11. Wild J, Hussey M, Flanagan J, Trope G. Pointwise topographical and longitudinal modeling of the visual field in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993; 34:1907-1916.
12. Smith SD, Katz J, Ouigley HA. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei. 1996;37:1419-1428.
13. Brigatti L, Hoffman D, Caprioli J. Neural networks to identify glaucoma with structural and functional measurements. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996:121:511-523.
14. Goldbaum MH, Sample PA, White H, et al. Interpretation of automated perimetry for glaucoma by neural network. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Scl. 1994;35: 3362-3373.
15. Mutlukan E, Keating D. Visual field interpretation with a personal computer based neural network. Eye. 1994;8:321-323.
16. Accornero N, Capozza M. OPTONET: neural network for visual field diagnosis. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1995:33:223-226.
17. Liu X, Cheng G, Wu JX. Identifying the measurement noise in glaucomatous testing: an artificial neural network approach. Artlf Intell Med. 1994;6:401416.
18. Madsen EM, Yolton RL. Demonstration of a neural network expert system for recognition of glaucomatous visual field changes. Mil Med. 1994;159:553-557.
19. Spenceley SE, Henson DB, Bull DR. Visual field analysis using artificial neural networks. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1994;14:239-248.
20. Caudill M, Butler C. Naturally Intelligent Systems. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1990.
21. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RadiologyA982:143:29-36. .
22. Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 3rd ed. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd; 1994:443-447.
23. tandis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1997;33:159-174.
24. Fleiss JL. The measurement of interrater agreement. In: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York, N Y: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1981:211-236.
25. Werner EB, Bishop Kl, Koelle J, et al. A comparison of experienced clinical observers and statistical tests in detection of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma using automated perimeter. Arch Ophtha/mol. 1988;106:619623.