The distortion of cardinal preferences in voting

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4149 LNAI, Issue , 2006, Pages 317-331

  Procaccia, Ariel D ^a   Rosenschein, Jeffrey S ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

CARDINAL PREFERENCES; ORDINAL PREFERENCES;

INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

EID: 33751001041     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11839354_23     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. J. Bartholdi and J. Orlin. Single transferable vote resists strategic voting. Social Choice and Welfare, 8:341-354, 1991.
2. J. Bartholdi, C. A. Tovey, and M. A. Trick. How hard is it to control an election. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 16:27-40, 1992.
3. S. J. Brams and P. C. Fishburn. Voting procedures. In K. J. Arrow, A. K. Sen, and K. Suzumura, editors, Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, chapter 4. North-Holland, 2002.
4. A. Caprara, H. Kellerer, U. Pferschy, and D. Pisinger. Approximation algorithms for knapsack problems with cardinality constraints. European Journal of Operational Research, 123:333-345, 2000.
5. V. Conitzer and T. Sandholm. Complexity of manipulating elections with few candidates. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 314-319, 2002.
6. E. Elkind and H. Lipmaa. Small coalitions cannot manipulate voting. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2005.
7. E. Ephrati and J. S. Rosenschein. A heuristic technique for multiagent planning. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 20:13-67, 1997.
8. S. Ghosh, M. Mundhe, K. Hernandez, and S. Sen. Voting for movies: the anatomy of a recommender system. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on Autonomous Agents, pages 434-435, 1999.
9. T. Haynes, S. Sen, N. Arora, and R. Nadella. An automated meeting scheduling system that utilizes user preferences. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pages 308-315, 1997.
10. J. Matousek. Lectures on Discrete Geometry, chapter 15. Springer, 2002.
11. B. L. Monroe. Fully proportional representation. American Political Science Review, 89(4):925-940, 1995.
12. A. D. Procaccia and J. S. Rosenschein. Junta distributions and the average-case complexity of manipulating elections. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 497-504, 2006.